Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
TridentOfNeptune

Great captain rework still holding strong

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
41 posts
12,343 battles

- Secondary builds dead (and need to sacrifice 11 points for them to still suck, laughable) 

- BBs specing concealment + fire prevention/superintended + dead eye to snipe not spoted (great design)

- CAs specing out of concealment + these stupid skills to get HE dpm to snipe spoted (even greater design)

- DDs standard torpedo build or nerfed gunboat build + concealment (mega rework done)

 

And there you go, for diversity of builds 

 

And it's still not beeing adressed xD How long is it already? This incompetent mysterious balance "team" is making fun of themselves with every day that passes 

 

 

  • Cool 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
13,110 posts
7,885 battles

Agree - instead of fixing the skill rework disaster they remove historical hulls such as the Bayern A Hull. Yea why leave Immersion in the game if we can break it further?

 

And anyone who signed into the game once could easily tell them why Dead Eye is a bad idea and how to fix it. 

What data are they collecting?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VICE]
Players
1,872 posts
18,680 battles
1 hour ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

And anyone who signed into the game once could easily tell them why Dead Eye is a bad idea and how to fix it.

Anyone with even a vague knowledge of the game knew this skill was silly without even logging in. It shouldnt have needed any discussion or testing, its an idiotic skill and i dont know what they were thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
1 hour ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

What data are they collecting?

 

Probably the amount of money they are making from people reskilling their captains... once it dries up, make changes to rework so people have to start from scratch again :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CAIN]
Players
5,207 posts
25,733 battles
1 hour ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

Agree - instead of fixing the skill rework disaster they remove historical hulls such as the Bayern A Hull. Yea why leave Immersion in the game if we can break it further?

 

And anyone who signed into the game once could easily tell them why Dead Eye is a bad idea and how to fix it. 

What data are they collecting?

Historical stuff is so 2015, the new "thing" is turning this game into a mix of AFK Arena and raid shadow legends. 

 

Besides, the new target audience is so clue less about the history of these ships, they don't care anyway, especially if it makes it easier for them to free XP their way to TX.

 

What data? At this point, i think they are collecting data on how much tears they can farm, how many face palms tjeir decisions get and how much money rhey can milk off the casual windowlickers.

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
13,110 posts
7,885 battles
7 hours ago, DFens_666 said:

 

Probably the amount of money they are making from people reskilling their captains... once it dries up, make changes to rework so people have to start from scratch again :Smile_trollface:

you write it as if it was a joke...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NECRO]
Players
6,381 posts
Vor 8 Stunden, Jethro_Grey sagte:

Besides, the new target audience is so clue less about the history of these ships, they don't care anyway

And then, when asked in their history exams which was the mightiest navy of the World Wars, they unflinchingly write down "Russia"...

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NECRO]
Players
6,381 posts
Vor 14 Minuten, 1MajorKoenig sagte:

you write it as if it was a joke...

Sounds like the GW approach: "We change the rules every other year, so you can throw away your armies and buy new ones."

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,553 posts
1,028 battles

There are a couple of things about the rework that I like -- using captains across multiple ships. Paying reset costs out of elite captain XP is also great.

Like everything WG does, it could have been great. But instead, all my BBs use the same build, all my cruisers use the same build, all my DDs use the same build. I can't imagine what they were thinking when they approved radically reducing the number of possible builds.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NECRO]
Players
6,381 posts
Vor 24 Minuten, SodaBubbles sagte:

I can't imagine what they were thinking when they approved radically reducing the number of possible builds.

They were thinking: Let them get used to our next step: Auto-skilling. One build to rule them all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PASOK]
Players
94 posts
10,687 battles

Not a single bb  of mine have deadeye. 

Not a single cruiser have spotted build. 

All captains reseted before update kicks. 

Now I have a bunch of ships which acting exactly the same and just doing dailies. 

I left gw2 to come here before update due to many extra time(Tnx covid :/) and guess.... I'm back to my old game and left this in pc logging in playing a battle and g logging out. No interest at all unfortunately cause that so called build diversity,, is only for premium ships with one captain, but that requires me to give a lot of milk to do it. I was watching the game for years and know it was awesome but now is nothing else but a money sink. So no. I'll just keep it f2p for now. Remaining premium days 110ish and that's it. Feeling sorry for vets that have experience of what it was while see what it becomes.

Guess I'm happy I manage to play 3 months of what it was at least.... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,650 battles
33 minutes ago, SodaBubbles said:

 using captains across multiple ships.

this is the only new thing, you could use ECXP for retraining/reset before the rework ....

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,300 posts

Havent played cruisers much lately, and I took a week long break from anything else than Big Hunt. Took out my radar neptune and tried to play safely. Played 5 matches and got oneshotted in 2 by BB sitting 15km away. Now i know why they are offering containers to cruiser players in ranked.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[K_R_T]
Alpha Tester
1,075 posts

Biggest gripe with the rework is that an already passive playerbase got even more passive.

And a team with competent players rolfstmp the other team more now, than before this rework.

Just imagine how the REMFs would react if they changed the criteria of Deadeye so enemy ships must be within your own BB detection range to activate?

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
874 posts
9,576 battles
1 hour ago, Hugh_Ruka said:

this is the only new thing, you could use ECXP for retraining/reset before the rework ....

And you cant even really use those captains (practically, in theory you could if you pay the retrain price every time you switch). The purpose behind this update was to increase the grind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOO]
Players
2,337 posts
4,238 battles
1 hour ago, Bindolaf_Werebane said:

You people joke, but I wouldn't be surprised if a mobile version is in the works. Which would mean, simplify, simplify, simplify. 

Could you imagine WG having to share some of it's profits to use the Apple Store to sell the app?

I can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,387 posts
12,045 battles
56 minutes ago, Fat_Maniac said:

Could you imagine WG having to share some of it's profits to use the Apple Store to sell the app?

I can't.

Just look at Genshin Impact and other, even worse gacha games. I sure can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCUMM]
[SCUMM]
Players
943 posts
22,067 battles
Vor 2 Stunden, Bindolaf_Werebane sagte:

You people joke, but I wouldn't be surprised if a mobile version is in the works. Which would mean, simplify, simplify, simplify. 

 

Vor 1 Stunde, Fat_Maniac sagte:

Could you imagine WG having to share some of it's profits to use the Apple Store to sell the app?

I can't.

 

I guess you missed something, it started 2018: https://eu.wargaming.net/en/games/wowsb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GEUS]
Players
820 posts
2,680 battles
3 hours ago, MementoMori_6030 said:

Sounds like the GW approach: "We change the rules every other year, so you can throw away your armies and buy new ones."

And this is why I no longer give money or GW or WG. Businesses need to turn a profit, obviously, but there is a fine line between that and blatantly rinsing customers. A fine line that both companies mentioned have left waaaaay in their rear-view mirror at this point.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NOCV]
Players
81 posts
8,317 battles

the reason for the new captain skills to come; constantly getting players' money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NOCV]
Players
81 posts
8,317 battles
13 dakika önce, _DeathWing_ dedi:

538iac.jpg

Devils rally to salvage a split with Sabres despite still problematic  special teams | Battle Of Hudson

Even if the deadaye is rework again, the t10s will give up from the camp ??

shimas will play again on 1 and 10 bb's will play on a and z again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×