Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Update 0.10.2 – Italian Battleships: Part 2

118 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles
5 hours ago, Mani202 said:

SFX are not working. No welding sparks, no AA animations, no wave distortions from main gun fire, ship fires look exactly the same, ship explosions look exactly the same, shell water hit look exactly the same, torpedo looks the same, no parachutes and corkscrewing aircraft deaths. 

My GFX settings are maxed out.  GForce 1080.  Checked the settings and there is no option for please tick here for all the hyped up new SFX.  Do I need to reinstall the client?

 

Many thanks

You have to understand WG logic here: Client side improvements are only activated by server patches. Don't ask me why, I don't understand either ....

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
702 posts
19,227 battles
Vor 16 Stunden, firerider202 sagte:

Well, that is unwanted by the community. That was shown well enough when they tried something with cäsare. When you need to organize refounds, different ship versions and stuff like that its just not worth it in comparison to just remove the ship from sale and move on. 

 

Any elements of the community - be they in WG or the playerbase - that have a problem with the game operating on a level playing field are people that the game is better off without.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,021 posts
On 3/16/2021 at 10:03 AM, firerider202 said:

Well, that is unwanted by the community. That was shown well enough when they tried something with cäsare. When you need to organize refounds, different ship versions and stuff like that its just not worth it in comparison to just remove the ship from sale and move on. 

 

WG on purpose releases overperforming vessels to push sales, then artificially limits these items, because "op", only to reintroduce them in scam boxes. It is the same with WoT. This is a strategy, not a mistake. With GC they realized in WoWS too how much money they can make by just sh****** on balance and do whatever they want.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Před 18 hodinami JohnMac79 řekl/a:

 

 

 

 

 

4717110_sorrywhat.jpg.5930990a8a498438fd7a24bcf0d098f5.jpg

Which is something, that gave us important data for future. We released T-61, kinda rushed that to be ready for gamescom... and we released that strong, very strong. From that time we simply don't want to repeat the same mistake, so we pay more attention to those ships during testing. Erich wasn't strong during testing. Her combat effectivenes got better after players learned how to play it properly.

 

Před 17 hodinami Mani202 řekl/a:

SFX are not working. No welding sparks, no AA animations, no wave distortions from main gun fire, ship fires look exactly the same, ship explosions look exactly the same, shell water hit look exactly the same, torpedo looks the same, no parachutes and corkscrewing aircraft deaths. 

My GFX settings are maxed out.  GForce 1080.  Checked the settings and there is no option for please tick here for all the hyped up new SFX.  Do I need to reinstall the client?

 

Many thanks

As others mentioned, those changes will be active with release of Update 0.10.2, which will be tomorrow. Now the server is still running 0.10.1.

 

Před 14 hodinami Von_Pruss řekl/a:

This is nothing but a straight out lie and you should have just kept silence instead of posting such bs and lying into our faces. You can easily look up battles played per ship, as you can read above. Especially T-61 and Erich (CV) from the start were very powerful and climbed the top rank of their class and tier with less battles than all the other ships. You know why you add powerful tools to the game, only to artificially limit them again. Taking Spee out of the store and the other ships only serves one purpose, to reintroduce them in boxes. And you know it. How can you blatantly lie into our faces? It is ridiculous and you should really feel ashamed. It is ridiculously unprofessional what you are doing over and over again. What an amateurish CM you are.

As mentioned above with T-61 and Erich. Erich got there slowly.

If you talk about reintroducing Spee to boxes, well she always been part of Santa containers, or regular Supercontainers, where are also other rare ships like Giulio Cezare, or Belfast etc.

They will just be removed from direct sale, which is announced months in advance, to give the option to those, who are interested in purchasing them. Also this removal doesn't mean, that in future they won't return. Some of those ships were available for purchase for very long time and it is our choice to take it down for a while, from announced reasons.

I am definitely not lying to you here.

 

Před 14 hodinami bobtherterrible řekl/a:

Hey @YabbaCoe it says here in my game that I can gain access to v veneto by completing a special mission.

 

What's the special mission? Did I miss it?

 

image.png.a2428aed1098b34f4a3a1bc3e8613da2.png

 

Same for Lepanto

 

image.png.8ed5fc196b4532be574ed9d56606d52a.png

Good point here actually, I will report that higher.

Vittorio Veneto can be obtained only from consecutive bundles in Armory for IT tokens and Lepanto only from random bundles in Armory. In 0.10.3 they both will be obtainable for credits in tech tree.

 

Před 11 hodinami Hugh_Ruka řekl/a:

You have to understand WG logic here: Client side improvements are only activated by server patches. Don't ask me why, I don't understand either ....

Why those changes should be implemented sooner than arrival of the update itself?

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
157 posts
15,019 battles
13 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

Why those changes should be implemented sooner than arrival of the update itself?

It shouldn't, it's very obvious that people making those comments have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles
1 hour ago, YabbaCoe said:

Why those changes should be implemented sooner than arrival of the update itself?

Since the client is updated BEFORE the server update for EU, it should be possible to use the new visuals without having to wait for server update.

 

I mean I can change the client (install different mods) without having to wait for server patching ... this is the same situation ... there is no need to wait ...

  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Před 23 minutami Hugh_Ruka řekl/a:

Since the client is updated BEFORE the server update for EU, it should be possible to use the new visuals without having to wait for server update.

 

I mean I can change the client (install different mods) without having to wait for server patching ... this is the same situation ... there is no need to wait ...

There is the need to wait as all of those changes are relevant to Update 0.10.2, but until the implementation of the update to EU server will be done, you can't just switch from one version to another. It is not possible to run two update versions on one server at the same time.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF2]
Players
4,054 posts
5,642 battles
51 minutes ago, YabbaCoe said:

There is the need to wait as all of those changes are relevant to Update 0.10.2, but until the implementation of the update to EU server will be done, you can't just switch from one version to another. It is not possible to run two update versions on one server at the same time.

 

You don't seem to understand so I won't try to explain ... seems futile ....

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LCDP]
Beta Tester
166 posts
27,917 battles

The changes are only tested in the context a of a full patch, not a partial one (some of the client features only). If they were to do a partial client update I would expect that the client would be even more buggy, so I prefer waiting a bit longer for eye candy an keep the client stable until the patch hit the server

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VICE]
Players
1,872 posts
18,680 battles
4 hours ago, YabbaCoe said:

Which is something, that gave us important data for future. We released T-61, kinda rushed that to be ready for gamescom... and we released that strong, very strong. From that time we simply don't want to repeat the same mistake, so we pay more attention to those ships during testing.

Smolensk said hi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Právě teď JohnMac79 řekl/a:

Smolensk said hi.

The problem with Smolensk is, that it is not OP :cap_haloween: Very annoying to play against, yes, but not OP

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7 posts

This is a load of bollocks. I just want to play the game. Where's an option to patch when the update actually goes live? Why do I have to download a 4.5gb patch that's NOT OUT YET just to play the bloody game on current version?

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,131 battles
18 minutes ago, Naughtilus said:

This is a load of bollocks. I just want to play the game. Where's an option to patch when the update actually goes live? Why do I have to download a 4.5gb patch that's NOT OUT YET just to play the bloody game on current version?

That you do not need to patch it on patchday.

It does not really matter when the game is patched, as long as you know it in advance.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7 posts
22 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

That you do not need to patch it on patchday.

It does not really matter when the game is patched, as long as you know it in advance.

 

I don't care. What I care about is not being able to play the bloody game until I patch.  If I can download the patch in advance, I should be able to choose when to do so, AND IT SHOULDN'T PREVENT ME FROM PLAYING THE CURRENT VERSION.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,131 battles
5 minutes ago, Naughtilus said:

 

I don't care. What I care about is not being able to play the bloody game until I patch.  If I can download the patch in advance, I should be able to choose when to do so, AND IT SHOULDN'T PREVENT ME FROM PLAYING THE CURRENT VERSION.

Game patches for online games do not work that way. This is not Office.

The only way to postpone the patch is to not open the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,402 posts
24,784 battles

The main problem is when captain rework will be finally completed ? I have >100 captains, most without any skill. I play only a few ships becouse that and I don't like it.

 

This is a total fail, becouse something what should be done with special care and tested in  special modes like submarines, was just thrown into normal game. Many skills are so unballanced or there is lack of them, so there is no need for even testing most of this fail ideas. Why there is vigilance only for BB, why some of DD was nerfed hard becouce "reworked" turret traverse, dead game perk, useless super heavy shells, nerf of secondaries etc ? It looks like players are far more interested in a game then devs.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ROUGH]
Players
97 posts
10,246 battles

Why the premium Italian Battleships container still isn't available for purchase?

WG wants the whales who cant wait to get Marco Polo to purchase it with doubloons first? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GUKA]
Beta Tester
18 posts

If you own all 4 ships from the Italian containers , is there 0% chance for one to "drop" , and if not what kind of compensation is " paied out "

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,131 battles
19 minutes ago, ImLate said:

Why the premium Italian Battleships container still isn't available for purchase?

WG wants the whales who cant wait to get Marco Polo to purchase it with doubloons first? 

Why Dubloons? Just use coal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Před 12 hodinami Naughtilus řekl/a:

This is a load of bollocks. I just want to play the game. Where's an option to patch when the update actually goes live? Why do I have to download a 4.5gb patch that's NOT OUT YET just to play the bloody game on current version?

In WGC you have the option to tick out the preload. So if you don't want to download the upcomming update in advance, just tick it off and next time you will do so when the update arrives.

 

Před 15 minutami ImLate řekl/a:

Why the premium Italian Battleships container still isn't available for purchase?

WG wants the whales who cant wait to get Marco Polo to purchase it with doubloons first? 

I will investigate on that.

 

Před 3 minutami Perguru řekl/a:

If you own all 4 ships from the Italian containers , is there 0% chance for one to "drop" , and if not what kind of compensation is " paied out "

 

Afaik, if you have for example 3 of those and you were about to get the duplicate, it will give you the one, you don't have yet. If you have all four, you should get doubloons. But I will investigate on that first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THROW]
Players
195 posts
12,595 battles

WTF have you done to tracer and torpedo plume textures? STs have told you over and over again that this is trash and you still proceeded with this unwanted change.

 

God, what a joke. You're no longer even pretending that you listen to your STs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, WG Staff, WG Staff
10,676 posts
5,440 battles
Před 21 minutami Ydoum řekl/a:

WTF have you done to tracer and torpedo plume textures? STs have told you over and over again that this is trash and you still proceeded with this unwanted change.

 

God, what a joke. You're no longer even pretending that you listen to your STs.

Interesting, how can you know STs told us that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
5,710 posts
13,399 battles
54 minutes ago, Ydoum said:

WTF have you done to tracer and torpedo plume textures? STs have told you over and over again that this is trash and you still proceeded with this unwanted change.

 

God, what a joke. You're no longer even pretending that you listen to your STs.

 

Whats the Problem with the Tracers/Torps ?

(Only Played Big Hunt this Morning so havnt checked new Graphics yet)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THROW]
Players
195 posts
12,595 battles
5 minutes ago, Sunleader said:

 

Whats the Problem with the Tracers/Torps ?

(Only Played Big Hunt this Morning so havnt checked new Graphics yet)

 

Shells and torps are barely visible now. Especially AP shells which, of course, blend in perfectly with the skybox.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
5,710 posts
13,399 battles
Just now, Ydoum said:

 

Shells and torps are barely visible now. Especially AP shells which, of course, blend in perfectly with the skybox.

 

Hmm.

Will Check on it when I get home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×