Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
22cm

Will the MM limit of 5 BBs in a game be increased?

23 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[RONIN]
Beta Tester
5,791 posts
31,660 battles

Because soon there will be nothing else than sniping-camping BBs in the queue. 

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
12,668 posts
10,100 battles

Just put all CVs, Conqs, Thunderers and Slavas into one match, let the rest have fun.

Problem solved!

  • Cool 9
  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,351 posts
11,686 battles

Seriously speaking: you cant do that, since you will have games with 7/8 BBs and 1 or 2 cruisers, which will make them even more cannon fodder.

 

Quite a dilemma. If there only would be a way to make BB less popular... hmhm..

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[B-N-Z]
Players
446 posts
5,673 battles
Il y a 15 minutes, ForlornSailor a dit :

 

 

Quite a dilemma. If there only would be a way to make BB less popular... hmhm..

Wg tried that for years with German BBs, they never managed to make them unpopular :Smile_trollface:

  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Players
1,385 posts
4,895 battles
29 minutes ago, 22cm said:

Because soon there will be nothing else than sniping-camping BBs in the queue. 

I'd actually like it if they cut the amount of BBs to 4 max.
It would be healthier overall for the game, and maybe I'm just a bit biased here, but I really think it would be nice for the BB players to feel some consequences of playing the most overplayed class for once.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,224 posts
13,299 battles
21 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

Quite a dilemma. If there only would be a way to make BB less popular... hmhm..

Happened once, years ago when WG accidentally broke underwater penetration mechanics. Cruisers were safe and actually fun to play for 3? 4? days before it was hotfixed

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LX]
Players
1,746 posts
34,750 battles
33 minutes ago, Humorpalanta said:

yes-yes-it-is-all-coming-together-let-th

So Montgomery Burns has been reincarnated as a Raccoon?

 

34 minutes ago, Humorpalanta said:

3 CVs and 9 BBs per side. :D 

Sounds like one of his dastardly plans.

Ehhxcellent.

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RONIN]
Beta Tester
5,791 posts
31,660 battles
3 hours ago, ForlornSailor said:

Quite a dilemma. If there only would be a way to make BB less popular... hmhm..

Best reason for WG to introduce subs. :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
6,569 posts
24,012 battles
1 hour ago, 22cm said:

Best reason ox feces excuse for WG to introduce subs.

Fixed that for You...

As if subs would ever get a chance to cross a whole map to go after the borderhumping BaBBies sitting on the A-Line :cap_cool:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,006 posts
15 minutes ago, Deckeru_Maiku said:

As if subs would ever get a chance to cross a whole map to go after the borderhumping BaBBies sitting on the A-Line :cap_cool:

Wonder if WG have bought into the 'Silent Hunter' franchise?

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RONIN]
Beta Tester
5,791 posts
31,660 battles
15 minutes ago, Deckeru_Maiku said:

As if subs would ever get a chance to cross a whole map to go after the borderhumping BaBBies sitting on the A-Line :cap_cool:

The subs could be pre-deployed behind the enemy lines... :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,036 posts
18,274 battles
6 hours ago, ForlornSailor said:

If there only would be a way to make BB less popular...

DD players - assemble! It's our civic duty (bonus points for DWT)...

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
206 posts
3,498 battles
7 hours ago, 22cm said:

Because soon there will be nothing else than sniping-camping BBs in the queue. 

There is no point in playing much else, so...

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,957 posts
7,787 battles
30 minutes ago, Verblonde said:

DD players - assemble! It's our civic duty (bonus points for DWT)...

 

You'll achieve far more spamming HE from a Conqueror than any DD ever will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,036 posts
18,274 battles
27 minutes ago, Capra76 said:

 

You'll achieve far more spamming HE from a Conqueror than any DD ever will.

Yeah, but that's no fun!

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
9,068 posts
15,706 battles
7 hours ago, Panocek said:

Happened once, years ago when WG accidentally broke underwater penetration mechanics. Cruisers were safe and actually fun to play for 3? 4? days before it was hotfixed

 

Strange that often bugs improve the gameplay of this game.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
6,569 posts
24,012 battles
1 hour ago, Capra76 said:

 

You'll achieve far more spamming HE from a Conqueror than any DD ever will.

I guess that depends a lot about one defines "achieving" something in this game...

Exp, Creds and whatsnot? Yeah, maybe...

But for me exp are optional... creds got accumulated over the years and are easy to get in medium tiers, so for they don't as an "achievement"

For me it's mostly having fun in the game. Which I have when I win battles or at least have a good and interesting battle... which is the utterly opposite of camping the A line in a HE spamming BB

I mean, yeas, I put a DeadEye skilled captain on my Thunderer... but I expect it still to move around on the map a bit once in a while... so it might still end up as fun... :cap_cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,505 posts
37,596 battles

I would prefer to put a historically realistic limit of 3 BBs per team.

This way the few BBs will feast on many cruisers and farm devstrikes.

All others will be thrown into BB-only matches to clear the queue.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,168 posts
6,026 battles
9 hours ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

 

Quite a dilemma. If there only would be a way to make BB less popular... hmhm..

that would be easy.

-30% shell velocity so that can be dodged by cruisers

steeper final trajectory for long range shells, so thay can be lobbed onto island campers easier than island campers can fire out

dispersion based on elevation not traverse. because this was stupid and never should have happened

50% nurf to sigma, because by the time these ships could have had guided artillary, missiles where more popular anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,159 posts
12,563 battles

Not likely, as WG remedy will just be to add Bots, lots of CA, CL & DD Bots (as necessary)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×