Jump to content
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Public Test of Update 0.10.0: Round 2

21 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[THESO]
Players
1,503 posts
18,095 battles

It would appear that there are no more containers for premium ships.

Wargaming seems to have enough testers just handing out a couple of signals.

For me however this is not worthwhile anymore, so I'll take the reward of 65 GB more space on my hard drive and uninstall the PT-client.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,068 posts
15,102 battles
3 hours ago, HMS_Kilinowski said:

It would appear that there are no more containers for premium ships.

Wargaming seems to have enough testers just handing out a couple of signals.

For me however this is not worthwhile anymore, so I'll take the reward of 65 GB more space on my hard drive and uninstall the PT-client.

FWIW They are only interested in testing hardware compatibility from a wide range of users before the Live date. I never understood the attraction of grinding for the Season rewards as there is the opportunity cost of losing play time on the Live server and not making progress there... if you got some free ships though good for you :b

 

I've only ever really bothered playing the minimum 3 battles for flags and camos, sometimes will stretch for a WG container if it was attached to something I was interested in doing anyway. Status quo ante.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG Staff
2,321 posts
916 battles
4 hours ago, anonimekiller2 said:

Is it all about the brawls?

 

Hi anonimekiller2, you can find more information about the update on this publication. 😊 

20 hours ago, TechoD said:

How long until patch?

 

I am still grinding for alaska.

Hi TechoD, Alaska will be removed with Update 0.10.1, which, if everything goes according to the plan, should be released in the first quarter of 2021. 😊Schermata 2020-12-17 alle 15.27.55.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOHOU]
Players
195 posts
4,282 battles

Quite a list of good ships ther that go , have the massa and its nice to have a us brawling bb with decent secondaries range , tho would love to play alaska because i play atm the us CA line and really enjoying it so far. good that thunderer goes, hated that he spammer anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
1,265 posts
25,778 battles

Why no love for Flint's gun range? Isn't she the same ship as Atlanta?

Also, their aa has been nerfed to the ground compared to what they were...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
9 posts
18,820 battles

You are still defending the secondary nerf.....

 

It does not take "extensive testing" to understand that having half the accuracy compared to the old manual secondaries is a giant nerf.

 

Let alone how rarely you actually fire secondaries on both sides.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SWN]
Players
170 posts
8,290 battles

WG again insisting on changes noone ever asked for....

New captain skill are so badly thought out, again like a crack addict came up with them.

Do Devs actually play the game they help develop?

It's kinda sad that WG has become such a sh*tty game studio while they have in the basis a very good IP to work with...

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GLOBS]
[GLOBS]
Players
261 posts
16,869 battles

really starting on Christmas day  ????? I am glad to see an extra day because of the Holliday . .  but . . . you all need time off too . we all do . please can you consider this in future .  Happy Christmas Everyone . 

 

Untitled(9).jpg

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALYEN]
Players
2,376 posts
4,207 battles

Oh God they are still going on about Secondary skills on BBs like they can't do math. You don't need to test anything if the secondary firing mechanics as such don't change (dispersion formula or aiming points for secondaries).

 

Still pretending you need more testing to make sure to not lower Secondary efficiency ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LUSOS]
Players
372 posts
21,736 battles
  • Bots are turned off for Random Battles in the Public Test. Battles with players only will allow us to get more precise data on updated Commander skills.

oh boy, this will be fun then:

image.png.05db59ffbd366e9b39c4403275e0c986.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LUSOS]
Players
372 posts
21,736 battles
2 minutes ago, powerverde said:
  • Bots are turned off for Random Battles in the Public Test. Battles with players only will allow us to get more precise data on updated Commander skills.

oh boy, this will be fun then:

image.png.05db59ffbd366e9b39c4403275e0c986.png

here we go:

image.thumb.png.73d26ae69a19871671525b0df8594305.png

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
1,265 posts
25,778 battles
5 hours ago, powerverde said:

here we go:

image.thumb.png.73d26ae69a19871671525b0df8594305.png

That should make for a great testing session! Enjoy deadeye! hahahah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,154 posts

168.000 Coal for the Flint and Weasley Gee is going to nerf it into a Turd before my very eyes, Just when I think my opinion of them can't get any lower they bring in better digging equipment  :Smile_facepalm:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LUSOS]
Players
372 posts
21,736 battles
21 hours ago, tsounts said:

That should make for a great testing session! Enjoy deadeye! hahahah

It was a very good test.
We went for center of the map and saw u had the better AP's rng

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
1,265 posts
25,778 battles
3 hours ago, powerverde said:

It was a very good test.
We went for center of the map and saw u had the better AP's rng

Could have just rammed each other! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×