Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Cyclops_

World of Warships pay 2 Win Player

43 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[OGHF]
Players
1,211 posts
21,993 battles

As per the title, total of 101 random games and 14 co ops, not sure if a re roll or not, fortunately he was on the opposite team, thankfully. (as it is copy & paste rather screen shot, it is a bit jumbled in places, but it is easy to work out )

 

 

 

Next update in 14 min.
 
 
  Overall Recent
Battles 101 0
Win rate
Next level: Average (+0.5%)
48.51%
Below Average
- -
Personal Rating (PR) 
Next level: Unicum (+46)
2 054
Great
- -
Battles survived 34.65% - -
Average battle values  
Damage 54 012 - -
Destroyed warships 1.43 - -
Aircraft Destroyed 0.98 - -
Experience 921 - -
Kills / deaths 2.18 - -
Warships spotted 0.06 - -
Damage upon spotting 6 206 - -
Tier 4.6 - -
Warships stats by type (PR)  
Destroyer - - -
Aircraft Carrier - - -
Battleship
Next level: Unicum (+217)
1 883
Great
1 883
Great
-
Cruiser 2 912
Super Unicum
2 912
Super Unicum
-
Warships stats by type (Win rate)  
Destroyer 0%
Bad
0%
Bad
-
Aircraft Carrier 0%
Bad
0%
Bad
-
Battleship
Next level: Below Average (+1.9%)
45.12%
Bad
45.12%
Bad
-
Cruiser
Next level: Super Unicum (+1.8%)
63.16%
Unicum
63.16%
Unicum
-
 

 

Charts

 
 

 

Warships stats by type

Cruiser 19 63.16% 2 912 2.16 47 230 0.11 5
Charleston 131 843
Tenryū 2
Alaska Battleship 82 45.12% 1 883 1.26 55 583 1.18 6
Kawachi 141 857
Wyoming 14
Wyoming

 

Warships stats by tier

Tier
Battles
Win rate
PR
Avg. frags
Avg. damage
Avg. planes destroyed
Max. frags
Maximum damage
Max. planes destroyed
5 20% 3 711 2 27 192 0 4
Chester
54 980
Chikuma
 
III 29 58.62% 3 504 2.1 49 483 0 6
Kawachi
131 843
Tenryū
 
17 52.94% 3 151 1.94 69 584 1 5
Wyoming
141 857
Wyoming
14
Wyoming
V 33 48.48% 1 673 0.94 48 630 1.97 3
Kongō
129 329
Kongō
10
Kongō
7 57.14% 1 241 0.57 52 625 1.29 1
Fusō
93 758
Fusō
4
Fusō
IX 3 66.67% 1 207 1 57 213 0.67 3
Alaska
92 954
Alaska
2
Alaska
7 0% 521 0.29 79 499 0.86 1
ARP Yamato
129 458
ARP Yamato
3
ARP Yamato

Weapons statistics

  Warships destroyed Hit Ratio Maximum kills
Main Battery 131 39.57 % 6
South Carolina
Secondary battery 5 22.24 % 1
Wyoming
Torpedoes 2 56.67 % 2
Tenryū
Aircraft 0 - 0
By ramming 4 - 1
Charleston
 

Records

Damage 141 857
Wyoming
Destroyed warships 6
South Carolina
Experience 2 482
Kongō
Aircraft Destroyed 14
Wyoming
Warships spotted 1
ARP Yamato
Damage upon spotting 53 576
ARP Yamato
 

Important moments

Date Type Details
 

Transfers

No data

Warships

 All |  DD  CV  BB  CA    Minimum battles:    Tier:  
 
 
 All |  Commonwealth  Europe  Italy  U.S.A.  Pan-Asia  France  U.S.S.R.  Germany  U.K.  Japan  Pan-America
Show only:  Premium Ships  Regular Ships
 
 
  Warship Tier Nation Battles Win rate PR Average Damage Avg. frags Avg. planes destroyed  
Kongō   Kongō 5 Japan 29 55.17% 1 878 51 392 1.07 2.17  
2 Wyoming   Wyoming 4 U.S.A. 11 63.64% 3 116 70 790 2.09 1.45  
South Carolina   South Carolina 3 U.S.A. 9 66.67% 3 018 40 551 1.78 0  
4 Kawachi   Kawachi 3 Japan 9 22.22% 3 603 53 363 1.89 0  
Charleston   Charleston  3 U.S.A. 7 71.43% 3 505 51 802 2.57 0  
6 ARP Yamato   ARP Yamato 10 Japan 7 0% 521 79 499 0.29 0.86  
Fusō   Fusō 6 Japan 7 57.14% 1 241 52 625 0.57 1.29  
8 Myōgi   Myōgi 4 Japan 6 33.33% 3 276 67 374 1.67 0.17  
Chester   Chester 2 U.S.A. 4 0% 2 771 20 245 1.5    
10 New York   New York 5 U.S.A. 4 0% 517 28 608 0 0.5  
Alaska   Alaska  9 U.S.A. 3 66.67% 1 207 57 213 1    
12 St. Louis   St. Louis 3 U.S.A. 2 100% 3 335 39 206 2.5 0  
Tenryū   Tenryū 3 Japan 2 100% 6 441 74 373 2.5    
14 Chikuma   Chikuma 2 Japan 1 100% 7 530 54 980 4 0  
  • Cool 2
  • Funny 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
371 posts

At least this is proper digging through someone's stats, instead of "but your wr, so that makes anything you might say untrue". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
1,885 posts
14,428 battles

I don't see the point of this, but to each his own I guess.

 

And I can still see who the player is by clicking or mousing over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OGHF]
Players
1,211 posts
21,993 battles
4 minutes ago, Miragetank90 said:

I don't see the point of this, but to each his own I guess.

 

And I can still see who the player is by clicking or mousing over. 

Thanks for that, think i have now sorted it

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LEEUW]
Players
2,630 posts
10,280 battles

What is the point of this thread? There are hundreds if not thousands of similar accounts......

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Players
138 posts
6,127 battles
6 hours ago, Cyclops_ said:

As per the title, total of 101 random games and 14 co ops, not sure if a re roll or not, fortunately he was on the opposite team, thankfully. (as it is copy & paste rather screen shot, it is a bit jumbled in places, but it is easy to work out )

 

 

 

as others have stated, I'm really not sure of the point of this thread, the ARP Yamato is hardly P2W when it's pretty much a carbon copy of the standard Yamato just with a free legendary mod. It's all stuff you could grind in-game basically. Maybe instead of worrying about other players, try to focus on your own game and self improvement?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SH33P]
Beta Tester
278 posts
6,940 battles

people keep using the term "pay2win" but i think they don't really understand what it means

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LADA]
Players
618 posts
9,043 battles
9 minutes ago, Zieten said:

people keep using the term "pay2win" but i think they don't really understand what it means

Perhaps 'pay to skip your way to T10 without having the slightest clue of how a keyboard works' is a bit of a mouthful. 

 

12 minutes ago, Peffers said:

Why the shaming, they have not anything not allowed by WG?

No shaming - just questioning the need to buy...

a) a ship already in the game obtainable for free. 

b) a ship that is at the highest tier - allowing in theory someone with 0 battles experience jumping straight into T10 

c) all of the above for £150 plus - which is virtually equivalent to 3x entire PC/Xbox/PS4 games. 

 

If you WANT to go ahead and paint yourself bright yellow and stand in the middle of the street you have that right and freedom. Just don't act surprised when everyone looks and points....

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SH33P]
Beta Tester
278 posts
6,940 battles
Just now, Gvozdika said:

Perhaps 'pay to skip your way to T10 without having the slightest clue of how a keyboard works' is a bit of a mouthful.

Yeah, but that's not the same as pay2win. You can call it pay4comfort or whatever, but pay2win is something entirely different

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Players
138 posts
6,127 battles
2 minutes ago, Gvozdika said:

Perhaps 'pay to skip your way to T10 without having the slightest clue of how a keyboard works' is a bit of a mouthful. 

very different to "pay to win"
enterprise is p2w, musashi is p2w, kaga is somewhat p2w, loewehardt is p2w, Massachusetts is p2w and there are many more. A fancy version of a tech tree ship is not p2w because you aren't enhancing your chances of winning over the tech tree ship.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,082 posts
9,479 battles
1 minute ago, Lordcrafty said:

enterprise is p2w, musashi is p2w, kaga is somewhat p2w, loewehardt is p2w, Massachusetts is p2w and there are many more.

 

Eh, i disagree. I dont think we have p2w in WoWs. Just looked at wikipedia, and apparently some people think, WoT is p2w, but not for the premium ammo ?! lol... so i guess they would say, WoWs is p2w too.

 

Quote

However, features affecting gameplay and win rate, such as purchasing a 100% crew training level, a premium account, premium vehicles, and converting experience points to free experience points, remain available for the paying customers only

 

Only people who have no idea would actually write this. Didnt know that i can raise my WR by exchanging XP to FreeXP :cap_fainting:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Players
138 posts
6,127 battles
5 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

Only people who have no idea would actually write this. Didnt know that i can raise my WR by exchanging XP to FreeXP :cap_fainting:

who are you quoting here?
 

5 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

Eh, i disagree. I dont think we have p2w in WoWs. Just looked at wikipedia, and apparently some people think, WoT is p2w, but not for the premium ammo ?! lol... so i guess they would say, WoWs is p2w too.

are we going to agree to define pay to win as such: "in online gaming, the practice of buying in-game items that give a player a very big advantage over others."
if so then a ship like the enterprise definitely qualifies. Just because they removed it from the store expressly to avoid people calling it pay2win doesn't mean it isn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LADA]
Players
618 posts
9,043 battles
9 minutes ago, Zieten said:

Yeah, but that's not the same as pay2win. You can call it pay4comfort or whatever, but pay2win is something entirely different

Without getting bogged down in semantics - anything that gives you an advantage over free-to-play players in exchange for money is technically pay to win. Want to get to high tier without any time/effort? Pay money and voila - instant progression to top-tier. That leapfrogging straight past the usual progression curve is an advantage that you have paid for - ergo....

 

This is opposed to grinding up to the very same Yamato for free - where that T10 performance can be obtained without spending a penny. If they're incompetent and cannot use it doesn't make a difference - the same way a muppet using an Enterprise doesn't suddenly make that CV suddenly balanced. 

 

Honestly, the fact that people are arguing over splitting hairs works in WG's favour - akin to EA 'surprise mechanics'..... :cap_book:

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,082 posts
9,479 battles
Just now, Lordcrafty said:

who are you quoting here?

Wikipedia

 

Just now, Lordcrafty said:

are we going to agree to define pay to win as such: "in online gaming, the practice of buying in-game items that give a player a very big advantage over others."
if so then a ship like the enterprise definitely qualifies.

 

But does the advantage come from itself or do i need to do something for it?

I guess we can agree, that a certain part would get no benefit at all, regardless if you let them play Lexington or Enterprise. Another, much smaller part, would only gain slight advantages, as they are already so good that they can do the same with any other CV too. Leaves the middle part which is up for debate i guess. But there you can also see people with Enterprise having worse stats than with a Lexington. Downside being, that HE bombers are easier to use than AP bombers.

I also know people who prefer other BBs than Massa, because they prefer more accurate mainguns.

And in the end, what would be an acceptable deviation in WR? Can i get 2% more WR from Enty/Massa than with any other ship? Or is that already p2w?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Players
138 posts
6,127 battles
8 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

But does the advantage come from itself or do i need to do something for it?

I guess we can agree, that a certain part would get no benefit at all, regardless if you let them play Lexington or Enterprise. Another, much smaller part, would only gain slight advantages, as they are already so good that they can do the same with any other CV too. Leaves the middle part which is up for debate i guess. But there you can also see people with Enterprise having worse stats than with a Lexington. Downside being, that HE bombers are easier to use than AP bombers.

I also know people who prefer other BBs than Massa, because they prefer more accurate mainguns.

And in the end, what would be an acceptable deviation in WR? Can i get 2% more WR from Enty/Massa than with any other ship? Or is that already p2w?

mhm, yeah it's all a pretty inconsequential benefit and, winning random battles isn't even that important. If they were however to hold a t8 season I feel like a lot of premiums would dominate. Maybe they're prepping for a t8 season with massa removal :Smile_trollface:.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,082 posts
9,479 battles
1 minute ago, Lordcrafty said:

mhm, yeah it's all a pretty inconsequential benefit and, winning random battles isn't even that important. If they were however to hold a t8 season I feel like a lot of premiums would dominate. Maybe they're prepping for a t8 season with massa removal :Smile_trollface:.

 

We did have T8 Clanbrawl seasons, Enty/Massa were quite popular.

And sometimes the setup itself can be more "p2w", than the actual ships. Like the 3v3 sprint when they released Pommern. The setup already favoured Pommern so much, its not a surprise that it would do very well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Players
138 posts
6,127 battles
Just now, DFens_666 said:

 

We did have T8 Clanbrawl seasons, Enty/Massa were quite popular.

And sometimes the setup itself can be more "p2w", than the actual ships. Like the 3v3 sprint when they released Pommern. The setup already favoured Pommern so much, its not a surprise that it would do very well.

don't talk to me about pommern, you'll only remind me that I wasted my coupon on it xD. Yeah it was set up for the season but it was only a ranked sprint. You could likely have completed it just by playing a lot of games.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PWN3D]
Beta Tester
703 posts
19,071 battles
41 minutes ago, Gvozdika said:

No shaming - just questioning the need to buy...

a) a ship already in the game obtainable for free. 

b) a ship that is at the highest tier - allowing in theory someone with 0 battles experience jumping straight into T10 

c) all of the above for £150 plus - which is virtually equivalent to 3x entire PC/Xbox/PS4 games. 

 

Sorry, I have considered your points but it is shaming.  It makes pay 2 play top tier easier but there has always been an element of the more you pay the easier it is to get to TX.

 

The OP did not need need to shame this player to make these points, did you?  It is up to the player on what they spend their money on, the fact that it is the equivalent to 3 Xbox games, you should look at WG.

 

 

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-IAN-]
Players
2,043 posts
6,904 battles
48 minutes ago, Gvozdika said:

Perhaps 'pay to skip your way to T10 without having the slightest clue of how a keyboard works' is a bit of a mouthful.

 

But perhaps more correct than the simpler "Pay to Win" from earlier.

 

TBF in any team based game there is little chance of any "real" pay-to-win because even the best players can't undo the efforts of a whole team full of potatoes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×