Update 0.9.10 – American Battleships: Part 2

[Fesvil]

1 hour ago, 416taylor said:

Why not remove the flags aswell nobody can be so stupid to buy them in rb. or why not remove the whole rb.

Hey, let me get the ships first :-)

[USS_YourMom]

Remove that one pls xD i guess its most unpopular item ever in this RP shop.
I got mine for free, but ofc i sold it too. There is also some other ships with stupid updates that make ships like a lot worse than better 😂

[Peffers]

2 hours ago, Fesvil said:

......, they've started  giving away RP for "free" if you just do your daily games.. So, they're now closing one more way to get Free exp, after getting all RP ships, what else todo with the RP you have? overpriced flags? HAHAHA.. 

 

This I can agree with.

 

Personally, the RB is spawn of the devil and should be removed with all but teh basic pseudo in game currencies.   I do love it when WG supporters call this a "free to play game" when it is so obviously  "pay to win".

[TicoXotaR]

14 hours ago, Klopirat said:

at least the Belfast '43 should show up during 0.9.10., this ship is already shown in the logbook (on the RU server):

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I've been after the Belfast for over 2 years now and to have the 43 edition is good for now!

[FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor]

The minimap is broken. All the ship symbols always point North. .

Looks like it was a mod, installing the latest mod pack version seems to have fixed it.

[gnist0s]

Dear WG, please please please  DONT CHANGE MY PORT WITH THIS UPDATE  i love the one i use.

 

29/10-20 - EDIT: THE BLAH's JUST COULD'NT KEEP THEIR HANDS OFF MY PORT

 

  zzzzz   zzzzz   zzzzz

 

 

[Salty_Raven]

Would be nice if someone would fix the little bug that reset changes made to the key binding on "Select Priority AA sector" if it is changed.

I can change the key binding on it and play with the change, but if I close down the game and start it back up again, then the key binding is reset back to default, O

[Hogger4169]

On 10/27/2020 at 3:16 PM, radius77 said:

Why do you remove conversion of RB into freexp ? Not popular - what does it mean ? Goliath is also not popular - remove ?

Because this is 10.000 doubloons "gift". So this is a profit to be lost, that's why they discharged it. The not popular "excuse" is for the crap. Monetization is a bad disease....

 

OTOH, RB is unpopular but you gave "free" ships to make it look appealing, nobody asked nobody wants it. It took me a 9 months to get Ohio with endless grind and i have a bad experience. According to that RB is unpopular and must be scrapped....

Or i am wrong.....

[tubissimo]

Bonjour 

 

J'avais cru comprendre que le vermont serait disponible aujourd'hui mais il est encore bloquer dans l'arbre technologique.  

 

C'est moi qui ai mal compris ou un soucis de maj ?

[Klopirat]

1 minute ago, tubissimo said:

Bonjour 

 

J'avais cru comprendre que le vermont serait disponible aujourd'hui mais il est encore bloquer dans l'arbre technologique.  

 

C'est moi qui ai mal compris ou un soucis de maj ?

as written in the patch notes (and before, and even already BEFORE the release of 0.9.9.) the three new US BBs will stay in early access during update 0.9.10. and become "regular" tech tree ships in 0.9.11.

[416taylor]

15 hours ago, TicoXotaR said:

I've been after the Belfast for over 2 years now and to have the 43 edition is good for now!

Buy some santa mega. if you have all the ships on that premium list you will have rare ships I have 13 rare ships Belfast included

[TheWarJaC]

6 hours ago, tubissimo said:

Bonjour 

 

J'avais cru comprendre que le vermont serait disponible aujourd'hui mais il est encore bloquer dans l'arbre technologique.  

 

C'est moi qui ai mal compris ou un soucis de maj ?

Captain, 

This is the English section of the Forum, please write in English the next time. You can find the French section here: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/forum/134-communauté-francophone/

 

[Stronginthearms]

On 10/27/2020 at 2:31 PM, Steel_duck_1 said:

 

There were 11 world wars? crap I never knew about like 9 of them :-D

well the napoleonic wars were global so that was really the first world war

[Bad_Players_Are_Toxic]

On 10/27/2020 at 1:00 PM, The_EURL_Guy said:

The second part of the American Battleships event, a new collection, and a new temporary battle type.

Read it on the portal

Ok. But where is the good content? Where is the fun stuff that makes putting up with the terrible teams and one sided roflstomps worth it?

 

People who need post-it notes to remind them to breathe have created toxic gameplay.

 

If i wanted toxic gameplay, i'd be playing World of Tanks. The game needs to counter that to make it worth my time. 

 

Until the next patch i'll remain in Arma 3 and a few other better games. We'll see what crap that patch brings i guess...

[Belustigungspanda]

Is there some dutch holiday or why is my clan's naval base dutch all of a sudden? (english client)

 

[ovcebe]

In the Public Test of Update 0.9.10, I read something  about "Being able to play on multiple servers with only one client". Now I can't find any mention about his, and when trying to switch to another server, WGC requires another (huge) client.

Was this change not included with this update?

[FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor]

On the naval battles page, the ship type icons are missing above the columns now.

 

[FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor]

Also what happens the first time this patch (I think) is that at the end of a battle, the last image from the previous battle is shown for a split second.

WG it is really high time you introduced some form of quality assurance.

All of these minor issues are super easily avoided just by following long established best practice in software development, it's known for literally decades.

[elzviz]

...and OFC, second item in collection is DUPLICATE... CMON

[wot_2016_gunner]

3 ore fa, FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor ha scritto:

Also what happens the first time this patch (I think) is that at the end of a battle, the last image from the previous battle is shown for a split second.

same, tho for the rest my game is fine.

[Aragathor]

4 hours ago, FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor said:

WG it is really high time you introduced some form of quality assurance. 

But that costs money.

[YabbaCoe]

Commanders!

 

We are sorry for all the issues you are currently facing since the release of Update 0.9.10. We know about all those issues and currently we are working on the possible fix. But for that, we also need your help to possibly test those fix on different setups, that would be similar to yours, who are facing those issues.

So please, if you are facing issues with launching torpedoes, minimap issues in coop, with "ghost ships", sounds with planes or desync:

Create a Bug Report Ticker on Customer Support, include screenshots, replay and most important WGCheck.

 

We simply need more data from those, that are facing those issues.

Thank you very much for your cooperation.

[Captain_82]

Noticed one minor issue since the latest patch.

 

After jumping into Killer Whale with my Ryujo I realized that the AA of the moored König was more powerful than before.

At least two torpedo bomber turned yellow and red in no time.
I observed that "issue" several times, so it likely wasn`t just bad luck/overlapping AA auras ...

 

I could not find any info in the patch notes... so did german BBs receive an AA-buff?

[Bad_Players_Are_Toxic]

On 11/5/2020 at 11:26 AM, YabbaCoe said:

Commanders!

 

We are sorry for all the issues you are currently facing since the release of Update 0.9.10. We know about all those issues and currently we are working on the possible fix. But for that, we also need your help to possibly test those fix on different setups, that would be similar to yours, who are facing those issues.

So please, if you are facing issues with launching torpedoes, minimap issues in coop, with "ghost ships", sounds with planes or desync:

Create a Bug Report Ticker on Customer Support, include screenshots, replay and most important WGCheck.

 

We simply need more data from those, that are facing those issues.

Thank you very much for your cooperation.

So you want us to do your jobs (QA testing) for free?

 

Because you're too greedy to do it correctly yourselves, you rush out content before it's ready and then require your playerbase to do your jobs for you?

 

 WG is a company, not a charity. Although the amount of things you beg your playerbase for makes me second guess that statement.

 

On the plus side, it makes it very easy to not return to your game. Why would i pay to return to an unbalanced bugfest where the developers have no respect for the paying players?