[NMA] mantiscore Players 533 posts 9,088 battles Report post #1 Posted October 20, 2020 3 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] DFens_666 Players 12,664 posts 9,841 battles Report post #2 Posted October 20, 2020 Is there any explanation or should we just guess? 2 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] ForlornSailor Players 7,312 posts 11,668 battles Report post #3 Posted October 20, 2020 I wanna solve the puzzle: Salem is missing! What do I win? 2 10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NMA] mantiscore Players 533 posts 9,088 battles Report post #4 Posted October 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, DFens_666 said: Is there any explanation or should we just guess? No. I think the glorious soviet craftmanship is kind of clear and known all around the world. Of course I am talking about the healthy state of the game and the lack of favoritism of wargayming 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SYD] Molly_Delaney Players 832 posts 2,315 battles Report post #5 Posted October 20, 2020 Easy solution: WG could give me all the Russian ships and my glorious 46.something% winrate will soon equalise the figures...... 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PP-PP] KHETTIFER Players 286 posts 12,235 battles Report post #6 Posted October 20, 2020 "Perfect Armor" according to WG, nuff said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SICK] Exocet6951 Weekend Tester 5,142 posts 11,207 battles Report post #7 Posted October 20, 2020 Reject plating Embrace dakka -Colbert gang 2 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CATS] ColonelPete Players 31,115 posts 15,725 battles Report post #8 Posted October 20, 2020 Since you included premiums: http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20201017/eu_2month/average_ship_u.html Looks more like mixed results, especially when you consider the statistical perculiarities of some the RU ships... 2 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] ForlornSailor Players 7,312 posts 11,668 battles Report post #9 Posted October 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, mantiscore said: No. I think the glorious soviet craftmanship is kind of clear and known all around the world. Of course I am talking about the healthy state of the game and the lack of favoritism of wargayming Aah thats the reason why you cut off the screenshot at Puerto Rico, because exactly below is ... *drumroll* 5 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-OOF-] ollonborre Beta Tester 2,214 posts 10,294 battles Report post #10 Posted October 20, 2020 Top 5, contains Soviet ships, bottom 5, contains Soviet ships- Perfectly balanced, as all things should be. 2 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NMA] mantiscore Players 533 posts 9,088 battles Report post #11 Posted October 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said: Aah thats the reason why you cut off the screenshot at Puerto Rico, because exactly below is ... *drumroll* my main point of the post was the Petro and Stalin, as you can see, they are a bit distinctive from the others winrate wise 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] DFens_666 Players 12,664 posts 9,841 battles Report post #12 Posted October 20, 2020 We have Petro for ~3,5 months now. Lets go back to when Venezia was that new: 2months Venezia being 3,5 months in the game (released mid nov 2019, stats from dec+jan) http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/pastrecords/20200201/eu_2month/average_ship.html >52% Same stats a bit earlier http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/pastrecords/20200111/eu_2month/average_ship.html Almost 53% So should we be surprised? Not really, seeing how Petro carries radar, having match influence being even a bit easier. But its not far off from venezia at the same period. Stalingrad is still being played by best players, there is no reason for it to plummet to 50%. Or you wanna say, people who have 60% and more WR on their acc should only win 50% with Stalingrad, even tho they win more with other TX CAs? 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NMA] mantiscore Players 533 posts 9,088 battles Report post #13 Posted October 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, DFens_666 said: So should we be surprised? Not really, seeing how Petro carries radar, having match influence being even a bit easier. But its not far off from venezia at the same period Venezia is also pretty strong, but i'm not complaining about that ship right now. And using the radar as an argument is just stupid, as the Alexander Nevsky carries one as well, yet it sits at 50%, with even less games. It's quite clear which ship is disgustingly broken. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[1FA] FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor Players 3,185 posts 22,869 battles Report post #14 Posted October 20, 2020 Nevsky obviously needs a major buff. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taliesn Players 2,049 posts 14,522 battles Report post #15 Posted October 20, 2020 31 minutes ago, mantiscore said: No. I think the glorious soviet craftmanship is kind of clear and known all around the world. Of course I am talking about the healthy state of the game and the lack of favoritism of wargayming Now do that for glorious soviet DDs. You know, for proper balans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[JOLLY] LoveZeppelin Players 520 posts 12,015 battles Report post #16 Posted October 20, 2020 So we are to understand that people who play Stalingrad are nolifers and are probably OP, while only potatoes play Puerto Rico? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] DFens_666 Players 12,664 posts 9,841 battles Report post #17 Posted October 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, mantiscore said: And using the radar as an argument is just stupid, as the Alexander Nevsky carries one as well, yet it sits at 50%, with even less games. It's quite clear which ship is disgustingly broken. Difference ofc was, that Nevsky concealment is 12,8km and Petro was 11,9km before the nerfs. Soon its slightly worse. I dont think radar in itself has too much of an impact for Petro. Maybe the 1% difference we see to Venezia in the same period. Other than that, they could aswell remove it and its still not bad. Also they should raise the ship from the waterlevel, its disgustingly low, which makes punishing it too hard. 6 minutes ago, LoveZeppelin said: So we are to understand that people who play Stalingrad are nolifers and are probably OP, while only potatoes play Puerto Rico? Well no, because one way to achieve PR was to no-life it and play 24/7. That wouldnt fit with the Stalingrad tho. Good people have Stalingrad, who constantly play CBs and Ranked in higher leagues. More and more "average" players get Stalingrad lately, and they perform really bad with it. PR was "easily" obtainable by heavy whaling, and a lot of noobs bought it... thats just it. Good players didnt want to invest that amount of time or money to get a meh-ship. Also the amount of time you needed to get it 4 free was just an insult anyway. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] lup3s Players 4,026 posts 21,570 battles Report post #18 Posted October 20, 2020 Goliath doesn't seem to be well-liked / played a lot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ACIER] Rainning Players 279 posts 3,020 battles Report post #19 Posted October 20, 2020 Il y a 46 minutes, mantiscore a dit : Just the both OP russian ship have bove 54% win rate, not choking at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THESO] SV_Kompresor Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 4,118 posts 10,328 battles Report post #20 Posted October 20, 2020 39 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said: Aah thats the reason why you cut off the screenshot at Puerto Rico, because exactly below is ... *drumroll* Welp, this is it I guess...Salem, hindy, yoshi and zao are apparently the worst ships in the game by far....Time to give them massive buffs, cause...you know...spreadsh1t. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[JOLLY] LoveZeppelin Players 520 posts 12,015 battles Report post #21 Posted October 20, 2020 11 minutes ago, lup3s said: Goliath doesn't seem to be well-liked / played a lot It isn't OP enough to be popular. Venezia and now Petro have set the bar high. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ACIER] Rainning Players 279 posts 3,020 battles Report post #22 Posted October 20, 2020 Il y a 14 minutes, domen3 a dit : Welp, this is it I guess...Salem, hindy, yoshi and zao are apparently the worst ships in the game by far....Time to give them massive buffs, cause...you know...spreadsh1t. Not the worst just because a lot a people play it so that why good / potato players. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THESO] SV_Kompresor Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 4,118 posts 10,328 battles Report post #23 Posted October 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, MyAngelAkagi said: Not the worst just because a lot a people play it so that why good / potato players. It was sarcasm 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ACIER] Rainning Players 279 posts 3,020 battles Report post #24 Posted October 20, 2020 Il y a 1 minute, domen3 a dit : It was sarcasm It's ok and l'm sorry x) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PANEU] kfa Beta Tester 1,975 posts 13,816 battles Report post #25 Posted October 20, 2020 25 minutes ago, lup3s said: Goliath doesn't seem to be well-liked / played a lot Boring by design. Absolutely not a bad ship, just boring. And the grind is horrible there is not 1 decent ship in the line up until the T10 so a lot of people give up. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
