Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Profilus

WG finally admits the level of general cv playerbase?

28 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
3,184 posts
9,230 battles

Ok, this is actually funny....wp WG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BHSFL]
Players
3,690 posts
13,487 battles

Could just as well been directed at those that fail to deal with them, just ignoring all the skills and modules that were designed for it.

  • Cool 2
  • Bad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
9,811 posts
8,982 battles

Thats a guy crying for help, he cant balance CVs because someone in charge wont let him :Smile_hiding:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CKBK]
Players
317 posts
17,053 battles
2 minutes ago, Beastofwar said:

Could just as well been directed at those that fail to deal with them, despite all the skills and modules that were designed for it......

And which skills and modules are those? def aa? bft?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BHSFL]
Players
3,690 posts
13,487 battles
28 minutes ago, Captaindanz said:

And which skills and modules are those? def aa? bft?

 

Designed for AA by WG :

 

- Basic Fire Training

- Advanced Fire Training

- Massive AA Fire

- Direction Centre for Fighters

 

- Auxilery Armaments Modification 1

- AA guns Modifications 1

- Auxilary Armamants Modification 2

 

- Fighter consumbale

- Defensive AA Fire consumable

 

 

A player builds his skills and modules around dealing with the most dangerous enemies. If he does not take any AA skills, modules and consumables, that are obviously not CV......it either that or what the lettercode implies.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1
  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
3,769 posts
11,181 battles
Just now, lovelacebeer said:

Well spotted and a completely fair assessment by WG of the majority of CV players in game.

Imagine the games state if the majority were topclass CV players instead. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CKBK]
Players
317 posts
17,053 battles

 

35 minutes ago, Beastofwar said:

 

Designed for AA by WG :

 

- Basic Fire Training

- Advanced Fire Training

- Massive AA Fire

- Direction Centre for Fighters

 

- Auxilery Armaments Modification 1

- AA guns Modifications 1

- Auxilary Armamants Modification 2

 

- Fighter consumbale

- Defensive AA Fire consumable

 

 

A player builds his skills and modules around dealing with the most dangerous enemies. If he does not take any AA skills, modules and consumables, that are obviously not CV......it either that or what the lettercode implies.

 

 

 

 

 

Thx for that essay, it just proves WG aren't using their own product.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,697 posts
18,565 battles
1 minute ago, Zuihou_Kai said:

Imagine the games state if the majority were topclass CV players instead. 

 

Then either WG would finally address the issues the re work caused or it would just be world of CVs 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,793 posts
19,107 battles
2 minutes ago, Zuihou_Kai said:

Imagine the games state if the majority were topclass CV players instead. 

We had that before the rework ^^

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
3,769 posts
11,181 battles
2 minutes ago, Europizza said:

We had that before the rework ^^

Yes but back then these battles were quite rare so it wasn't felt as they are being felt today. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BHSFL]
Players
3,690 posts
13,487 battles
4 minutes ago, Captaindanz said:

 

Thx for that essay, it just proves WG aren't using their own product.

 

Players aren't using the product you mean. They ignore what is there.

 

And frankly even i don't know what happens if you take all listed.....

  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
3,769 posts
11,181 battles
2 minutes ago, Beastofwar said:

 

Players aren't using the product you mean. They ignore what is there.

 

And frankly even i don't know what happens if you take all listed.....

You can find out by simply calculating the bonuses. 

In fact those skills and modules only make sense on ships with already high base AA values. the lower the base values the worse the skills and modules effect will be. So only halland/smalland/Friesland truly benefit. 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,793 posts
19,107 battles
5 minutes ago, Zuihou_Kai said:

Yes but back then these battles were quite rare so it wasn't felt as they are being felt today. 

Yes. That was my point. +1 4 u ^^ :Smile_great:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
3,769 posts
11,181 battles
Just now, Europizza said:

Yes. That was my point. +1 4 u ^^ :Smile_great:

It's quite difficult to understand with so little information given :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CKBK]
Players
317 posts
17,053 battles
19 minutes ago, Beastofwar said:

 

Players aren't using the product you mean. They ignore what is there.

 

And frankly even i don't know what happens if you take all listed.....

Well it won't help 99% of the ships, and investing in full AA build for that 1% of ships is kinda useless since most cvs will go for other targets anyways.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,489 posts
17,356 battles

For the first four posts it was about the joke made by WG. Starting with post 5 it turned into another CV discussion. Sigh.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,214 posts
24,008 battles
1 hour ago, Zuihou_Kai said:

Imagine the games state if the majority were topclass CV players instead. 

Empty. 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×