Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
YabbaCoe

PSA: Clans trading steel in CvC 9

62 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[XTREM]
Players
1,037 posts
10,815 battles
15 hours ago, Captn_Crap said:

Even though I understand the sanctions against VOR, I fail to understand how this affected fair play in clan battles. I mean in the end we would have fought against the same players anyway even if they didn't engage in account sharing.

 

Well, the unfairly acquired resources/ships will now be used against you and other normal clans.

 

Also it seems likely that people doing this will play these accounts as a team ("account sharing") doing 2, 3 or 4 times as many CB just to farm steel for their customers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
1,953 posts
25,221 battles

Let me get this straight. Maybe I'm missing something here.

 

Users from some clan got caught in severe violation of rules. Instead of banning user accounts WG resorted to disbanding the clan? What is stopping those users from forming another clan and repeating the same thing?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, Alpha Tester
3,411 posts
4,389 battles
1 hour ago, quickr said:

Let me get this straight. Maybe I'm missing something here.

 

Users from some clan got caught in severe violation of rules. Instead of banning user accounts WG resorted to disbanding the clan? What is stopping those users from forming another clan and repeating the same thing?

 

In future we may take action against the accounts themselves, but in this case they lost access to their clan, achievements, rankings, history and name, as well as all the resources accumulated in the season.

 

If they feel like going through this process again, we will of course take action again.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
305 posts
4,265 battles
21 minutes ago, MrConway said:

 

In future we may take action against the accounts themselves, but in this case they lost access to their clan, achievements, rankings, history and name, as well as all the resources accumulated in the season.

 

If they feel like going through this process again, we will of course take action again.

1 hour ago, TheBicentennialman said:

so what if family member is usin your acct to try out is that person breaking the rules ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NW_DE]
Players
251 posts
36,826 battles

In the german forum I asked why such clans are build on the eu-server and playing cw on other server. I didn't expect that and maybe not all clans do that, but that could be the answer. Earning money with farming steel and accountselling. 

 

I don't think that wg will ban every player who let a friend try a ship (or the half playerbase had to be banned 😜), even if that is against their rules but there is a big difference between let a friend try a ship and build a reroll-clan, earn money with farming and accountselling. 

 

Ban the accounts is not the right way (at the moment) because most of them are rerolls with only a few battles. Losing the clan and the steel is better. That hits also the guys who paid for that because now they paid for nothing. 

 

Sry guys, my english is really bad, I hope you understand what I was writing :cap_like:

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
595 posts
35,100 battles
On 8/19/2020 at 4:50 PM, YabbaCoe said:

In light of this, we have decided, in accordance with paragraph 13 of the Clan Rules (link), to disband this clan, which entails the loss of all achievements, rating, and naval base. Also, soon the steel received as a result of participation in the ninth season of clan battles by this clan will be removed from the players' accounts. If a player has spent the steel, any ship purchased with said steel will be removed, and the difference will be refunded. If the steel has been converted to coal and a ship was purchased with said coal, the ship will likewise be removed. These actions will not be subject to appeal.

This situation will not affect the clans that played against this clan in any way. The results of your games with them will not be affected. All measures concern only the clan which violated the rules.

 

Dear YabbaCoe,

 

Perfect action on the side of Wargaming to punish those who cheat as such. However, I have just 1 remark about the clans who played against the disbanned clan. You wrote that the outcome of their battle will have not any affect on them, but what if they lost by this way of cheating? They were denied a honest chance of obtaining steel or promotion to another division/league for that matter. Of course they had the chance of winning their battle, but still......

 

To my opinion the gains (steel/signals/doubloons/etc.) should be distributed to the clans who played against them and lost, to compensate them for dishonest gameplay.

 

To the possible downvoters on my post: my clan has only played the mentioned season CB's opening battle to acquire the CB missions to get an idea what CB's offer on the EU server. After that we stopped.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[130]
Players
19 posts
5,075 battles

For clarification: NO PLAYER WAS BANNED just THE CLAN GOT DELETED to deny the steel earned in clanwars by accountsharing.

 

So yeah, they can do it again tomorrow. 

To me it looks like WG is saving what they have now (Dont ban any players cause playerbase is decreasing) instead of FINALLY doing anything good for this game in the last years. 

 

All accounts that were shared should be banned (even if there are only a few games) and if other accounts match for having played the shared accounts, those have to banned as well.

 

And finally TOS should be updated: No VPN.

or

Simply block known VPNs.

 

 

THIS isnt even a clap on the fingers, its only a raised index-finger while saying "dont do it again".....yeah try this on your kids and count your steps until they do it again...you wont need 2 hands.

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORPZ]
Players
1,241 posts
9,682 battles
Am 19.8.2020 um 20:40, Karukaze sagte:

Since when are Chinese players weebs? At least get the terminology correct. :P 

since someone else already corrected you, i dont have to anymore xD

 

still want to tho :P

 

they are a shame for our pure and innocent weebculture. bad bad panzer vor!

 

sadly they already gathered up in a new clan...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,368 posts
37,429 battles
On 8/22/2020 at 6:05 PM, Xlanger80X said:

For clarification: NO PLAYER WAS BANNED just THE CLAN GOT DELETED to deny the steel earned in clanwars by accountsharing.

 

So yeah, they can do it again tomorrow. 

To me it looks like WG is saving what they have now (Dont ban any players cause playerbase is decreasing) instead of FINALLY doing anything good for this game in the last years. 

 

All accounts that were shared should be banned (even if there are only a few games) and if other accounts match for having played the shared accounts, those have to banned as well.

 

And finally TOS should be updated: No VPN.

or

Simply block known VPNs.

 

 

THIS isnt even a clap on the fingers, its only a raised index-finger while saying "dont do it again".....yeah try this on your kids and count your steps until they do it again...you wont need 2 hands.

 

 

 

yabba.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
61,968 battles
On 8/20/2020 at 1:28 PM, quickr said:

Let me get this straight. Maybe I'm missing something here.

 

Users from some clan got caught in severe violation of rules. Instead of banning user accounts WG resorted to disbanding the clan? What is stopping those users from forming another clan and repeating the same thing?

It's kind of a warning maybe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×