[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 14,701 posts 20,987 battles Report post #1 Posted August 7, 2020 In patchnotes it says this: Ingame it says this: So... which one is correct? @MrConway @Crysantos 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 10,325 posts 12,044 battles Report post #2 Posted August 7, 2020 Yes 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DEH] hellhound666 Beta Tester 992 posts Report post #3 Posted August 7, 2020 gotta love this company ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Crysantos WG Staff 3,415 posts 15,104 battles Report post #4 Posted August 7, 2020 41 minutes ago, El2aZeR said: In patchnotes it says this: Ingame it says this: So... which one is correct? @MrConway @Crysantos Hi there! It's a technical aspect why it's not displayed in the game as it's displayed in the publication. The patchnotes show technical modifiers which are needed to keep the necessary ration between cruising speed and max/min speed. They are not shown in the tooltip/in-game description in order not to overload it. Overall, due to the increased cruising speed, both min and max speed will be higher than without the unique upgrade, but, in order to keep the necessary ration, these modifiers are used. I hope this helps :) Greetings, Crysantos 2 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RO-RN] Animalul2012 Players 901 posts 13,167 battles Report post #5 Posted August 7, 2020 I have found another one regarding Slava: when you go and read her specifications in the research bureau, it says that it has a 22.7 km range when in reality it has 24.7km . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Azalgor Beta Tester 1,035 posts 16,626 battles Report post #6 Posted August 7, 2020 38 minutes ago, Animalul2012 said: I have found another one regarding Slava No wonder one sided games are a thing, with such inteligent people around... Compared to Kremlin 22,7 km Slava has 24,7 km... 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-LA-] Padds01 Players 699 posts 5,350 battles Report post #7 Posted August 7, 2020 i think WG are saying they think were too dumb to unerstand big bonus -small bonus =bonus! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Crysantos WG Staff 3,415 posts 15,104 battles Report post #8 Posted August 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Animalul2012 said: I have found another one regarding Slava: when you go and read her specifications in the research bureau, it says that it has a 22.7 km range when in reality it has 24.7km . Known issue, will be fixed Greetings, Crysantos 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LADA] Gvozdika Players 619 posts 9,059 battles Report post #9 Posted August 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Crysantos said: Known issue, will be fixed Greetings, Crysantos What - the Slava or the text discrepancy? 1 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 4,898 posts 20,476 battles Report post #10 Posted August 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Padds01 said: i think WG are saying they think were too dumb to unerstand big bonus -small bonus =bonus! To be fair to WG, this does actually apply to a fairly large portion of the player base. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WG] Crysantos WG Staff 3,415 posts 15,104 battles Report post #11 Posted August 7, 2020 30 minutes ago, Gvozdika said: What - the Slava or the text discrepancy? Text discrepancy, nice try though 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[2DQT] Nebuched Players 139 posts 4,461 battles Report post #12 Posted August 9, 2020 On 8/7/2020 at 2:17 PM, Crysantos said: Text discrepancy, nice try though Ships locked behind such a long grind should be better. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] black_falcon120 Beta Tester 1,178 posts 3,162 battles Report post #13 Posted August 9, 2020 16 minutes ago, Nebuched said: Ships locked behind such a long grind should be better. But then they’d have too much of an advantage over newbs making the game even less accessible 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zieten Beta Tester 283 posts 6,940 battles Report post #14 Posted August 10, 2020 On 8/7/2020 at 1:04 PM, Padds01 said: i think WG are saying they think were too dumb to unerstand big bonus -small bonus =bonus! Na, thats one of their tried-and-true methods of hiding stats. They claim it will "overwhelm" the average player. They already did that back in the early days of WoT when they hid camouflage-values and other pretty important metrics. They still do it. Same reason they don't show vertical dispersion because it would destroy the myth of bad soviet BB dispersion at long ranges. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites