Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
SteDorff

Dunkerque no crosses on turrets?

28 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
684 posts
5,119 battles

Dunqurke has no 3 templar crosses like shown in shop these kindah took me over the line to buy it.

dunqa.png

dunqab.png

  • Cool 4
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALYEN]
Players
1,619 posts
3,579 battles

Also the barrel ends are white instead of chrome/steel :-)

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMMX]
Players
1,053 posts
5,361 battles

Have you tried adjusting your graphics settings? If you've set them low for performance it might be dropping items on a particular layer that's only shown in higher settings, in the same way as higher texture settings improves the look of vegetation on islands.

 

That's not to excuse the result, you should get what you've paid for, no question.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SINT]
Players
848 posts
20,525 battles

Yes, interesting lack of details.. It’s not that we dont pay enough for the special look of these camo’s ( as stats wise they are no improvement) Might well demand that WG keeps their part of the deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
[BYOB]
Players
4,467 posts
19,653 battles

Bait and switch from WG. Who would have suspected it.

The more I look at the 3rd collab the more I'm happy that I haven't bought anything.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
[XTREM]
Players
1,584 posts
13,503 battles

Maybe a bug of some kind? I don't get why it wouldn't be there.

 

@Crysantos any idea mate? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
26,168 posts
14,106 battles

Looks like an unfinished version.

Just write a ticket and ask them to fix it.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
2,470 posts
11,067 battles

Guys, is this the first time the Wargaming art department has failed us?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALYEN]
Players
1,619 posts
3,579 battles
1 hour ago, gopher31 said:

Guys, is this the first time the Wargaming art department has failed us?

nope, there were special camo issues before this ...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG Staff
3,346 posts
14,075 battles
On 7/26/2020 at 12:21 PM, SteDorff said:

Dunqurke has no 3 templar crosses like shown in shop these kindah took me over the line to buy it.

dunqa.png

dunqab.png

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I will check internally and get back to you asap!

 

Greetings, Crysantos

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
215 posts
5,190 battles

It's just like the festive Graf Spee/Odin flag pennants that are shown in port but are removed in battle. I don't know why it does that, it looks really nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
1,334 posts
9,862 battles
On 7/26/2020 at 3:52 PM, gopher31 said:

Wargaming art department

Sorry mate but I think the Art Dpt is the best part of WG.

Lets give credit where credit is due. The people of the GFX team are doing a really good job.

 

My opinion.

 

If they have an error here I m sure they will fix it.

 

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
711 posts
On 7/26/2020 at 11:21 AM, SteDorff said:

Dunqurke has no 3 templar crosses like shown in shop these kindah took me over the line to buy it.

Minor point, but a Templar cross is actually this type:

 

240px-Knights_Templar_Cross.svg.png

 

That said, not sure how they managed to 'lose' the crosses and metal gun muzzles though; those screenshots from the store certainly look like the in-game model, so presumably that means someone actively had to remove those elements from the camo after they were taken. Given that it was a factor in your purchase decision, certainly here in the UK that would be grounds for a complaint under false advertising and a refund if you wanted one, not sure how it would be where you are but there's likely some similar legal mechanism set up. I'll be interested to hear what Crysantos can dig up about the situation.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
2,470 posts
11,067 battles
13 minutes ago, Saltface said:

Sorry mate but I think the Art Dpt is the best part of WG.

Lets give credit where credit is due. The people of the GFX team are doing a really good job.

 

My opinion.

 

If they have an error here I m sure they will fix it.

 

That’s actually what I meant. That’s why I said it’s the first time.

Wargaming art department have always done fantastic work. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
1,334 posts
9,862 battles
4 minutes ago, gopher31 said:

That’s actually what I meant. That’s why I said it’s the first time.

Wargaming art department have always done fantastic work. 

sorry mate, I misunderstood your question.

in WG the art dpt. is top class

 

@Crysantos

Sorry for the tag but we are passing compliments here and you shouldn't miss out, LOL

we call you for the good stuff also not only for complaints

Cheers

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
6,285 posts
24,153 battles

Looks like a mistake/bug, I am sure next patch it will be fixed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG Staff
3,346 posts
14,075 battles
12 hours ago, Saltface said:

sorry mate, I misunderstood your question.

in WG the art dpt. is top class

 

@Crysantos

Sorry for the tag but we are passing compliments here and you shouldn't miss out, LOL

we call you for the good stuff also not only for complaints

Cheers

lol thanks buddy, it is indeed much appreciated to also read some positive things!

 

Regarding the camo - it's a bug and will be fixed but I don't have an estimated date yet.

 

Greetings, Crysantos

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALYEN]
Players
1,619 posts
3,579 battles
13 hours ago, NobleSauvage said:

Minor point, but a Templar cross is actually this type:

 

240px-Knights_Templar_Cross.svg.png

 

That said, not sure how they managed to 'lose' the crosses and metal gun muzzles though; those screenshots from the store certainly look like the in-game model, so presumably that means someone actively had to remove those elements from the camo after they were taken. Given that it was a factor in your purchase decision, certainly here in the UK that would be grounds for a complaint under false advertising and a refund if you wanted one, not sure how it would be where you are but there's likely some similar legal mechanism set up. I'll be interested to hear what Crysantos can dig up about the situation.

I think consumer protection laws in this regard are very similar across the EU ... so WG should correct this ASAP ... I just hope they won't correct the SHOP but the actual camo ...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
6,285 posts
24,153 battles
40 minutes ago, Hugh_Ruka said:

I think consumer protection laws in this regard are very similar across the EU ... so WG should correct this ASAP ... I just hope they won't correct the SHOP but the actual camo ...

Pretty sure that shop image is a factory render meaning that IS the camo in question applied to ships model they use, there is likely a fo*kup in some res file or a wrong version of camo got packed into it, shouldnt be hard for devs to find and correct it but it prob wont warrant an emergency patch...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMMX]
Players
1,053 posts
5,361 battles
6 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

... but it prob wont warrant an emergency patch...

That depends on how many people ask for a refund ... :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
6,285 posts
24,153 battles
Just now, Strapps said:

That depends on how many people ask for a refund ... :Smile_hiding:

True, I doubt it will be such an issue though we havw what 2 weeks till next patch, thats considered a reasonable time frame by most people and most legislation, ofc WG should offer full refund for those that insist opon it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
684 posts
5,119 battles
On 7/27/2020 at 6:33 PM, Crysantos said:

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I will check internally and get back to you asap!

 

Greetings, Crysantos

Thanks it looks better with chrome and crosses (I would keep it anyway though) 

 

On 7/27/2020 at 9:45 PM, NobleSauvage said:

Minor point, but a Templar cross is actually this type:

 

240px-Knights_Templar_Cross.svg.png

 

That said, not sure how they managed to 'lose' the crosses and metal gun muzzles though; those screenshots from the store certainly look like the in-game model, so presumably that means someone actively had to remove those elements from the camo after they were taken. Given that it was a factor in your purchase decision, certainly here in the UK that would be grounds for a complaint under false advertising and a refund if you wanted one, not sure how it would be where you are but there's likely some similar legal mechanism set up. I'll be interested to hear what Crysantos can dig up about the situation.

 

Yes that would be The templar cross although someone might think there could be a connection maybe it was a templar ship first that tooked the gold from France at the start of WWII to bury on Oak island.

 

 

 

z1templdun1.png

z2templdun2.png

z4dun5.png

z3crossoak.png

 

 

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
6,285 posts
24,153 battles

So what you say is we get HMS Bermuda? :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×