Update 0.9.6: German Carriers

[CaiusJuliusBrutus]

More cv's, less money to you.... well done wargaming

[Shaka_D]

19 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

Stop making stuff up...

 

You really need to learn to quote / link in your sources when you provide data like this, otherwise people might not be able to validate or appreciate it fully when viewable in context with other data. It could therefore also be you who is making stuff up?

 

So, do the right thing next time if you want to appear more authoritative on the subject, otherwise you risk your claims being just as pointless as you make out others to be? Ironic isn't it?

[Egoleter]

2 hours ago, aleksi111 said:

Hold the door open, I'm coming as well

[ColonelPete]

12 minutes ago, vengeance69 said:

biggest [edited] you will lose more players as you think just because high players ask for it this game is over no use to play it anymore even if report some nothing done and now this

[edited] PPFFFFF

14k players online on average last 12 months compared to 12.6k players on average online the past 5 years.

https://stats.wotapi.ru/stats/wows/eu/total

[Makeport]

There was a time at WG that delivered and had logical creative ideas.

But those honeymoons are over a long time ago. What we see here is a conscious strategy to test all boundaries ... which 'we' who have been with since the beginning or at least 3-4 years can see, and the goal is given and of course: quantity without quality.

All this goes back to a time that existed to those who once were behind the construction of this company, their basic values.

Today, there are other players (On market MMO) who value people's sacrifices and purchases of their products without having to 'just make money' for the shareholder.

 

Can happily look back on the years that WG came out and delivered ... today it is paper ship and not much historical value anymore. I had a lot of contacts around our earth, but most of them are away from WG of what is happening today and came sneakily already about 1 year ago ... 'about'
.

 

Everyone knows that we live in a digital world and that it is changeable but Wg goes 'all in' on streaming and fiction in its eagerness to get a maximum in its quest to market itself. Has WG really thought that if we lose those who have really supported the company how will it be then..the inflow of money will decrease ... and then it is about the principle of loyalty and respect, but as I mentioned earlier in my text it is a fundamental issue on values that prevail.

 

I am not surprised if there is already a price tag on the company out there and that this has become a delay in view of Covid-19, and the future prospects in the economy, this WG act now and even before, strengthens and is a logical process, the future, say within 6 months or the equivalent may be decisive a little depending on how the cash flow comes in.

[DanSilverwing]

If you're wondering what to spend your 300 German tokens on, here's the choices:

 

[Cyanide_NL]

I see Nueve de Julio in the list, but not Boise, didn't the Boise have the turning circle problem then?

[wot_2016_gunner]

11 minuti fa, DanSilverwing ha scritto:

If you're wondering what to spend your 300 German tokens on, here's the choices:

 

I was already thinking about credits; it's my go to for left over tokens (unless of better stuff), 'cause i'm not in need of the rest

[CollingwoodDK]

On 7/7/2020 at 3:47 PM, ColonelPete said:

Yeh, do not like that either.

 

But here WG did something good.

No they will not. Because there is no real tutorial in game nor a manual how to play the game. 69 or 200 battles no difference at all!

[WascallyWabbit]

2 hours ago, wot_2016_gunner said:

I was already thinking about credits; it's my go to for left over tokens (unless of better stuff), 'cause i'm not in need of the rest

Hopefully no one spends them on more crap and frustrating to play against CV's..as for spending money with these clueless clowns anymore...the answer is just NO lol...as companies advertising and sponsoring on facebook recently showed the only way you get a blind, deaf and dumb company to listen is to hit them on the bottom line, when profits drop sharply they tend to miraculously begin to listen... if only we could unite long enough to make this tactic work...stop buying and i promise suddenly the correct fixes and game direction would happen. Till then we just have whatever broken crap they wanna pump out.

[CollingwoodDK]

16 hours ago, gabberworld said:

 

only thing what i really hate about wgc and other game launchers is that they use GPU. dunno what developer come to this idea that those simple apps need use that

They might calculating crypto currency on your pc?

[ColonelPete]

17 minutes ago, CollingwoodDK said:

No they will not. Because there is no real tutorial in game nor a manual how to play the game. 69 or 200 battles no difference at all!

When a player learns nothing in these 131 battles, then no tutorial in the world would help him...

[gabberworld]

5 minutes ago, CollingwoodDK said:

They might calculating crypto currency on your pc?

i been think'ed about that yes. one game i know todo that

[CollingwoodDK]

1 minute ago, ColonelPete said:

When a player learns nothing in these 131 battles, then no tutorial in the world would help him...

So they are basically on their own - noone tells them what they do wrong and you expect them to learn ?

[WascallyWabbit]

Just now, CollingwoodDK said:

So they are basically on their own - noone tells them what they do weong and you expect them to learn ?

Its obvious where we went wrong...signing up for the game in the first place LOL

[ColonelPete]

2 minutes ago, CollingwoodDK said:

So they are basically on their own - noone tells them what they do wrong and you expect them to learn ?

They are either braindead or already know everything. These players do not need tutorials.

[CollingwoodDK]

Just now, ColonelPete said:

They are either braindead or already know everything. These players do not need tutorials.

I think I cant argue with a troll. End of discussion. :).

[ColonelPete]

Just now, CollingwoodDK said:

I think I cant argue with a troll. End of discussion. :).

You are the one who claimed it makes NO difference if you have 69 or 200 battles protected MM.

Think about what you write next time.

[BruceRKF]

9 hours ago, Sea_w0lf said:

 

She is Community Contributor on NA server.

Fixed it for you.

[gabberworld]

53 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

You are the one who claimed it makes NO difference if you have 69 or 200 battles protected MM.

Think about what you write next time.

what protection we are talking here really? if you get tier V ship, you start play with big guys

[Admiral_H_Nelson]

10 hours ago, Sea_w0lf said:

 

He is Community Contributor on NA server.

Is "AprilWhiteMouse" a relative of "LittleWhiteMouse"?

 

(been out of action for 3 months due to illness - I lost track of all this stuff)

[Toivia]

24 minutes ago, Admiral_H_Nelson said:

Is "AprilWhiteMouse" a relative of "LittleWhiteMouse"?

 

(been out of action for 3 months due to illness - I lost track of all this stuff)

That's one and the same.

[CollingwoodDK]

Even if I wanted - I couldnt play with WGC running -cause for what reason ever it makes my graphics running hot.

YOU DIDN'T WARN BEFORE  that anything like that would happen!

SO WHY IN THE WORLD DO YOU HAD TO DO THIS!

SO PLEASE SEHALES; MR CONWAY OR CHRYSANTHOS EXPLAIN THAT TO ME!!!!!

Anyway all others - enjoy  Narai goes missing again!

[CollingwoodDK]

4 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

You are the one who claimed it makes NO difference if you have 69 or 200 battles protected MM.

Think about what you write next time.

The number does not make any difference at all - the difference is whether somebody bothers to explain the game mechanics. So do not even try to twist my words.

[gabberworld]

9 minutes ago, CollingwoodDK said:

The number does not make any difference at all

yes, seen players with 20k battles and they act like they play first time.

 

i think that this ColonelPete is secret WG payed user in forum as he always talk like that in here