Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Tanatoy

Results of Clan Season IX: Warrior's Path

65 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[WG]
WG Staff, Administrator, Community, WG Team
4,924 posts
4,150 battles

The recent season was quite significant both for players and the development team: for the first time, CVs participated in the season on equal terms with other classes. We thank everyone for participation and feedback. Despite some challenges, the season was very important for the determination of upcoming seasons and changes. Let’s see in detail the season’s results and tell what happens next.

 

Read the text.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 4
  • Boring 2
  • Bad 13
  • Angry 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CKBK]
Players
401 posts
19,422 battles

How about having CB with t9 ships till you fix the cvs, ships like JB and Musashi can be excluded. who in his right mind will pick a dd?  just keep making the same mistakes...

So instead of having a season in t10 where the aa is weak, we will have a season with no aa...

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CKBK]
Players
471 posts
25,569 battles
1 minute ago, konean said:

WG never fails to suprise

never surprised WG fails 

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST-EU]
Players
156 posts
4,686 battles

How about making a game called World of Carries, where the whole gameplay is based around CVs striking bots in PvE or PvP missions where who destroys the bots faster wins? The actual CV gameplay already feels like a boring minigame inside the main game which only main target is to annoy the surface ships playerbase, seeing how they have no concrete way of counterplaying them.

 

Think about it, there are no losers with this solution. Surface ship players won't feel bad about your incapability of making CVs a fun experience anymore, new players won't ask themselves why they have to play and invest into a game where there are pigeons designed to send them to port and those CV players that still manage to never get bored to hell playing them will feel even more accomplishment in downing ships that can't do anything about them.

 

Also a new game means new possibilities of making money..

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
355 posts
11,803 battles

How many times does the community have to say no to cvs in cb! The huge thread in the forum earlier by 0M40, the cross server cv boycot, and your still trying to force it down our throats. You would think you would maybe take some hints from any other tournament, like kots, where they have  not added Cvs. The only reason venezia was chosen is because it can actually deal with cvs, and has the ability to push, thats it, not because its OP. 

  • Cool 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
392 posts
3,934 battles

Excellent changes and suggested changes across the board.

I think the suggested changes to half the air detectability and in turn make the AA activation decay to be 20 sec is an excellent step towards giving destroyers a better time vs CVs.

Weather seems to be another good idea to limit CV spotting.

And I'm so dam happy that the next season will be tier 6.

Overall, bravo WG, you guys seems to be on the right track.

 

The only thing i'm quiet dissappointed is that the short, 2 week warning before the next season...

 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CKBK]
Players
471 posts
25,569 battles

this is just not the way if you want to have a "test" season, have a propper test season with noticeable changes, this is just the same crap, no incentive what so ever to play the next season...

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
508 posts
18,053 battles
30 minutes ago, Tanatoy said:

The recent season was quite significant both for players and the development team: for the first time, CVs participated in the season on equal terms with other classes. We thank everyone for participation and feedback. Despite some challenges, the season was very important for the determination of upcoming seasons and changes. Let’s see in detail the season’s results and tell what happens next.

 

Read the text.

Sorry @Tanatoy cant stop laughing of that dev articale

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
508 posts
18,053 battles
1 hour ago, Sehales said:

Your cache might have tricked you a bit. It was published 10 minutes ago: https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/40

Well @Sehales WG still have not learned anything from what the playerbase have told them that we dont want CVs in CBs and WG are just going down that road and say stuff the playerbase great job WG :cap_cool:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
536 posts

Decreasing destroyers' detectability range by half will only make a meaningful difference if the notification that cv planes have been spotted gets removed.

 

 

And please stick to the plan of not having different rulesets for random/ranked on one hand and clan battles on the other.

  • Cool 5
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[V-I-P]
Players
80 posts
9,828 battles
16 minutes ago, Martinez_AirPumpCommand said:

For feedback is important... 

:cap_haloween::cap_haloween::cap_haloween:

Feedback is important:cap_cool:, they need to check what they should never do, whatever the players recomend is something never to be implemented :D

 

Next time we should make posts about the need of a nerf for German ships & the desperate need for buff of the carriers.   :cap_haloween:

  • Funny 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[V-I-P]
Players
80 posts
9,828 battles
42 minutes ago, Captaindanz said:

How about having CB with t9 ships till you fix the cvs, ships like JB and Musashi can be excluded. who in his right mind will pick a dd?  just keep making the same mistakes...

So instead of having a season in t10 where the aa is weak, we will have a season with no aa...

 

Season X could be called Pearl Harbor , we might even see USS Arizona sunk by IJN dive bombers and torpedo bombers.

  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OHFK]
Players
267 posts
6,827 battles
Quote

To make time for us to develop improvements

Quote

season X will be conducted in a 7x7 format on Tier VI ships without any weather events. The restrictions remain the same: one carrier or battleship for one team.

You say you need to fix CV's in CB... and then announce next CB will include CV's?

 

:fish_nerv:

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,743 posts
9,747 battles

Can but wonder, if our feedback/requests are too difficult to understand? There must be a language barrier, which prevents them from understanding us... right? :Smile_unsure:

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,313 posts
19,716 battles

 

 

Quote

we want to try ........ We are going to conduct testing ....... We will try ....... we have been working on solutions ....... we will conduct a test .....

Guys, I just want to say, it's not working. Whatever you are trying and testing.... It's just not working. It hasn't been working since 30th of January 2019. Just stop, please.

  • Cool 15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
[TTT]
Players
1,602 posts
13,884 battles
5 minutes ago, Zigiran said:

You say you need to fix CV's in CB... and then announce next CB will include CV's?

Yes and on a tier where AA is significantly less a factor. But why care you know what this will be? Another Smokefiesta with nothing to prevent it from happening..... 

I will not go on a rant but i dislike the proposed DD AA Mechanics changes because it will effectively mandate a smoke useage to not be lit for 20 seconds extra.... 

I dislike that we have to play guineapigs on ships that are so significantly worse balanced.... there are many premiums on that tier that just outright make other ships obsolete and yeah CVs on Tier 6 will not have a support role but i guess you have to see that to figure out why.

 

And indeed reading quikrs post sums it up, you are trying for one and a half year and it got so much worse in this time.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OHFK]
Players
267 posts
6,827 battles
Quote

while battleships allow teams to confidently push a flank.

T6 BB's pushing a flank?

That would require you to increase the game time from 20 minutes to 60 minutes.

Starting in the center and the moving to a flank at 21 knots... just getting to a flank will take 20 minutes?

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
[TTT]
Players
1,602 posts
13,884 battles
1 minute ago, Zigiran said:

T6 BB's pushing a flank?

That would require you to increase the game time from 20 minutes to 60 minutes.

Starting in the center and the moving to a flank at 21 knots... just getting to a flank will take 20 minutes?

Well of course you can buy mutsu.... or run normandie... that is significantly fast ye?

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×