Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
mantiscore

How is this matchmaking even allowed???

27 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
521 posts
7,933 battles

Wargaming!

Could you please f*king explain to me how is this matchmaking possible?

You are literally putting a team with a tier 6 cruiser against a tier 8 one with a bs radar. This is some high level incompetency.

How on earth is it my fault that some dudes made a fail div?

Your trash system were not even trying to balance the teams. This is a gigantic disadvantage to one team.

Maybe spend your millions of euros coming from us on snickers bars because your devs does not worth a penny.

Thanks for you fair system. Really...

 

Inkedshot-20.06.26_00.09.30-0544_LI.jpg

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
257 posts
2,750 battles

Thats what happens when your team is compiled of a fail div.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,622 posts
9,692 battles

So faildivs should get rewarded?

Im not defending this in any way, ofc its BS, but actively rewarding faildivs by giving them better MM is surely not the way to go...

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
521 posts
7,933 battles
Just now, DFens_666 said:

So faildivs should get rewarded?

Im not defending this in any way, ofc its BS, but actively rewarding faildivs by giving them better MM is surely not the way to go...

Who talks about rewards? If anything, the other team got rewarded a win.

Or just simply not allow not tier mirrored teams

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,622 posts
9,692 battles
1 minute ago, mantiscore said:

Who talks about rewards? If anything, the other team got rewarded a win.

Or just simply not allow not tier mirrored teams

If you dont want them to be replaced by higher tier ships than themselves, you are saying, they shouldnt be lowtier -3, giving the T7 ship in the division better MM by being midtier at worst (T6-8 MM).

It already works with CVs, we dont need that with other divs too. WG should get rid of uneven tier divisions tbh...

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
521 posts
7,933 battles
6 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

If you dont want them to be replaced by higher tier ships than themselves, you are saying, they shouldnt be lowtier -3, giving the T7 ship in the division better MM by being midtier at worst (T6-8 MM).

It already works with CVs, we dont need that with other divs too. WG should get rid of uneven tier divisions tbh...

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

  • Bad 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,723 posts
11,324 battles
2 minutes ago, mantiscore said:

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

 

So you're fine with people manipulating the MM?

  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,392 posts
21,804 battles
6 minutes ago, mantiscore said:

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

So You want to penalize someone for not fail divving by putting him into a +3 battle? Dude.. really?

 

Add to that: it's usually not that one low tier guy in the fail division that loses the game.. it's the 11 other potatoes not being able to adapt to the situation...

Y'know, adapt.. like DDs have to adapt to any changes thrown at them ^^

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAFT]
Players
11,622 posts
9,692 battles
3 minutes ago, mantiscore said:

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8 

 

wait, what? You want to throw under people under the bus because some others make faildivs?!

That surely sounds fair :cap_fainting: Essentially you are proposing -3 MM to return to wows.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
521 posts
7,933 battles
Just now, Deckeru_Maiku said:

So You want to penalize someone for not fail divving by putting him into a +3 battle? Dude.. really?

 

Add to that: it's usually not that one low tier guy in the fail division that loses the game.. it's the 11 other potatoes not being able to adapt to the situation...

Y'know, adapt.. like DDs have to adapt to any changes thrown at them ^^

In this case my whole damn team got penalized

Id take one poor fella instead 11

  • Cool 2
  • Bad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WONLY]
Players
427 posts
16,425 battles

I'd rather take the T6 cruiser than a 40% CV tomato which sends his rockets to enemy cv right after battle starts.

 

Faildivs are so rare, there are more concerning problems regarding the Matchmaking imo.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[INTRO]
[INTRO]
Players
1,445 posts
18,564 battles

As long as divs with one tier spread is allowed things like this will happen. Don't blame the player for following the rules. And before anyone says it: No, limiting divs to same tier isn't the answer.

 

Blaming one guys MM for the fail of the whole team is just stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
535 posts
Vor 2 Stunden, mantiscore sagte:

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

That's an effing joke pulling someone random into a T+3 match. Unless you volunteer...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quality Poster, In AlfaTesters
1,733 posts
14,290 battles
4 hours ago, mantiscore said:

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

The MM actually does attempt to match up fail divs with other fails divs, if they exist in the queue at the time...

 

WG would be better off just not allowing such a division to even queue up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,807 posts
18,365 battles
Vor 4 Stunden, mantiscore sagte:

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

If the MM finds another fail div in the queue it will put it on the other team. I have seen that too many times for it to be a coincidence. Of course it would be nice that fail divs have to wait in queue until a likewise fail div is present.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,807 posts
18,365 battles
Vor 4 Stunden, DFens_666 sagte:

WG should get rid of uneven tier divisions tbh...

Except for tier 9/10, where a fail div is not really a fail div.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
7,180 posts
4 hours ago, Flock_Undead said:

Thats what happens when your team is compiled of a fail div.

Just where is the other part of that div? Failed div usually has one on the other side but this didnt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
977 posts
3,431 battles
3 hours ago, Astolfo_Is_My_Waifu said:

The MM actually does attempt to match up fail divs with other fails divs, if they exist in the queue at the time...

 

WG would be better off just not allowing such a division to even queue up.

 

the solution to this problem is simple:

the MM should just wait for another faildiv to turn up to start the match. if none is found, the faildiv just remains in the queue, waiting, with a message displayed: "the waiting time for faildivs is not limited, a match will start when another faildiv is found to match against."

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PUPSI]
Players
804 posts
2,665 battles

It is a mystery to me why they still allow different tiers in divs. Except maybe at T9 and 10, as @Johnny_Moneto says.

 

Until then, I've been on teams that have benefitted from this and teams that have been disadvantaged. It evens out in the end.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
257 posts
2,750 battles
3 hours ago, Yedwy said:

Just where is the other part of that div? Failed div usually has one on the other side but this didnt

It doesnt require another fail div on the other side, it just tries to equal out the Divs in general, which in this case didnt happen. Thats nothing rare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOO]
Players
1,980 posts
3,802 battles
9 hours ago, mantiscore said:

In this case my whole damn team got penalized

Id take one poor fella instead 11

The T6 on your team is no different and probably a lot better than a +/- 2 DD or CL that decides to yolo in from the start and get killed outright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
90 posts
Vor 9 Stunden, mantiscore sagte:

I would be fine with a fail teammate div if the other team gets the same tier ships

So in this case a random t6 guy instead of a t8

And I guess you will be the first one complaining when you are thrown in a +3 MM game when you are NOT in a division, but some division on enemy team did?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×