Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Maihon

Proposed Moskva Legendary Change...

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
229 posts
7,274 battles

Maximum dispersion of Main guns: down from -11% to -7%

Main Battery Traverse Speed: worse from -13% to -20%

Main Battery Range: +8%

 

No, leave it as it is, you've already kicked it from the tree, just leave it alone, the 20% MBTS in particular is way, way too much!

 

  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RO-RN]
Players
981 posts
13,997 battles

Nerfing legendary modules? Oh well guess who is never going to spend 19200 RP on something that after 1 month will get nerfed. A waste of time. What is the point of these things? To offer different play styles? Most legendary either make the ship a tiny bit better,others worse and some make it totally garbage. Would have been better if they would have not been introduced into the game. Also if they hammer zao,yamato and moskva legendary they become mostly obsolete, especially zao and yamato.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,203 posts
18,610 battles

To be fair this LM was considered among the best ones and a nerf is well deserved.

 

The extra main battery traverse nerf sesms a bit harsh though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
3,787 posts
15,168 battles
1 hour ago, Maihon said:

Maximum dispersion of Main guns: down from -11% to -7%

Main Battery Traverse Speed: worse from -13% to -20%

Main Battery Range: +8%

 

No, leave it as it is, you've already kicked it from the tree, just leave it alone, the 20% MBTS in particular is way, way too much!

 

Where are you getting this information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TACHA]
Players
253 posts
7,425 battles
55 minutes ago, gopher31 said:

Where are you getting this information?

Asking for a friend too....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CAIN]
Players
4,938 posts
20,778 battles
1 hour ago, gopher31 said:

Where are you getting this information?

Someone leaked a document with proposed changes to as of yet untouched LMs. Included were ships which so far didn’t even had one LM yet, I.e. Harugumo and Daring. 

 

WG was not happy at all about that. 

 

Yamato, Zao and a few others get the nerf bat treatment. With a big nerf bat. Basically, the better the LM was, the harder the nerf. The crappy ones are barely touched or not changed at all. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
[BYOB]
Players
5,141 posts
22,942 battles
1 hour ago, Jethro_Grey said:

The crappy ones are barely touched or not changed at all.

That's the idea, LM=Garbage. Expensive garbage.

And we all know that ships power creeped and hanging onto their LMs for a tiny bit of relevance will not get a buff. Just look at the Khaba.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
14,939 posts
21,689 battles
4 hours ago, Jethro_Grey said:

Basically, the better the LM was, the harder the nerf. The crappy ones are barely touched or not changed at all. 

 

Meanwhile Monty LM gets nerfed to oblivion not because it was too powerful, but because it was too popular.

 

tenor.gif

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,154 posts
13,064 battles

I'd welcome it if all LM were nerfed so hard that they are basically useless. Would take off the pressure to have to regrind crappy lines to get crappy tokens for the crappy RB to buy these LM just to not fall behind.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
3,787 posts
15,168 battles

So now is the time to demount all unique upgrades and wait until either, they are made useful again, or can be sold for more than 2 million credits.

 

The logic they use for these nerfs is flawed if it is the same as the previous announcement.

They fail to take into account the possibility that a player will likely be better if they've played a ship enough to unlock a unique upgrade.

They also conflate popularity with effectiveness. The Hindenburg upgrade is evidence enough that once someone unlocks an upgrade, they are more likely to use it rather than let it sit in inventory. 

 

These upgrades could have been made very unique and interesting. Now who will spend 19,200 rp on a downgrade

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
3,685 posts
18,027 battles
1 hour ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Meanwhile Monty LM gets nerfed to oblivion not because it was too powerful, but because it was too popular.

What was it you said about intelligence and players? 

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RODS]
Players
1,814 posts
7,824 battles
8 hours ago, Jethro_Grey said:

 

Yamato, Zao and a few others get the nerf bat treatment. With a big nerf bat. Basically, the better the LM was, the harder the nerf. The crappy ones are barely touched or not changed at all. 

Where would this info be found ?

 

 

(I only have 2 LM:s, Moskva and Zao)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,154 posts
13,064 battles
2 hours ago, Ronchabale said:

Where would this info be found ?

Read above. This is no official info (yet), but internal information from WG leaked and hit the public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RODS]
Players
1,814 posts
7,824 battles
55 minutes ago, ThePurpleSmurf said:

Read above. This is no official info (yet), but internal information from WG leaked and hit the public.

Ok, No worries, dont use the LM on Zao and dont enjoy the Moskva all that much

Pity tho that an LM that costs reset of two lines which is an insane amount of grinding shouldn´t be a noticeable reward and something "speshul" 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
339 posts
16,516 battles

Its only a waste of time to grind for leg. upgrades. Even if they are good WG will just change them in the future so all the work to get them is for nothing.

Most leg. upgrades are just trash, they are overpriced and if they are strong you can expect them to be changed at anytime.

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×