Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Tanatoy

ST - Asymmetric battles

37 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[WG]
WG Staff, Administrator, Community, WG Team
5,209 posts
4,324 battles

Read the text here.

 

Please note that all information in the development blog is preliminary and subject to change during testing. Any showcased features may or may not end up on the main server. The final information will be published on our game's website.

  • Cool 7
  • Funny 2
  • Bad 3
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,567 posts
245 battles

This will be interesting, if paired with historical objectives you could have a nice little game mode.

Otherwise im curious too see if this wont end up like confrontation or historical battles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quality Poster, In AlfaTesters
1,873 posts
14,718 battles

I'm not sure I see the point of putting tier 6s against each other, but one team has some tier 5s to support and the other has one or two tier 7s?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Weekend Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
6,075 posts
14,135 battles
18 minutes ago, Br0st said:

But why?

There are several players who want to have battle modes like "Kirishima meets USS Washington and USS South Dakota"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[L123]
Players
106 posts
21,950 battles

There is a huge problem in the way they tell us this idea...

 

not specification about class ships and number inside the class ship... They need to clarify how they put the things otherwise sounds like a semi historic way of battle things...  made in an horrible way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EUTF]
Players
282 posts
6,995 battles

Really you are going to test a thing that was a thing of unbalanced matchmaking of the old past and we fight and you fix it over time and now you try to test it again ...

Einstein said once " Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results "

 

airplane-cant-be-serious.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,325 posts

Not sure that will be very funny - for the higher tiers.

 

T5/6 vs T6/7 isn't that big in difference that 2:1 would be compensated by the Ships themselfe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
8,157 posts
14,609 battles
7 hours ago, Tanatoy said:

Read the text here.

 

Please note that all information in the development blog is preliminary and subject to change during testing. Any showcased features may or may not end up on the main server. The final information will be published on our game's website.

 

Amzing, so one team is larger with weaker ships.

Can't wait for all the Zeroed victories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AAO]
Clan Test Coordinator
1,597 posts
21,623 battles
12 hours ago, Zemeritt said:

Amzing, so one team is larger with weaker ships. 

Can't wait for all the Zeroed victories. 

For one it's only 1 tier difference in the spread (though it may be more pronounced depending on how the ratio of 7/6 and 6/5 will be on the individual teams)

And it's not like the majority of players aren't "skillful" enough to loose in a T7 against a T5 or to just get mobbed by multiple lower tier ships.

Let's just wait for the initial tests to see if the concept itself is decent, tweaking things afterwards is always an option.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
14,953 posts
21,719 battles
20 hours ago, Sigimundus said:

There are several players who want to have battle modes like "Kirishima meets USS Washington and USS South Dakota"

We had that.

j6lSM7q.png

 

Lets just say there is a reason why it no longer exists.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,242 posts
10,755 battles
8 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

Lets just say there is a reason why it no longer exists.

Let's see. I'm looking forward to that ... :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Players
1,263 posts

If WG said we are going to try a New idea and see how it roll's Great, For WG to say we are going to try an Old Idea that was a total :etc_swear: up in this and other games seems to smack of Laziness and S%+%dity, but Hey I'm just a Peasant with an increasingly tightening wallet what do I know  :Smile_coin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Weekend Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
6,075 posts
14,135 battles
1 hour ago, El2aZeR said:

We had that.

j6lSM7q.png

 

Lets just say there is a reason why it no longer exists.

I remember the "Old good times" :cap_old::Smile_hiding::Smile_glasses:

 

10999922_10205660750090779_5026450900964

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×