WG should help with toxic command spam

[KillStealBoss]

Just watch it.....

edited

 

[MementoMori_6030]

It is not very ergonomic, but there is a reason why I disable messages for every single player at the start of a battle. If you just disable chat, you still get stupid F-key-commands.

[PassTheSalt]

right click name in battle, disable messages, simples

 

[KillStealBoss]

12 minutes ago, PassTheSalt said:

right click name in battle, disable messages, simples

 

ah I wanted to disable the chat but it didn't work.

[Smeggo]

Hm, this looks like there should be a mod for that. I'm gonna see if something can be done 

[ColonelPete]

1 hour ago, MacArthur92 said:

Just watch it.....

20200526_170048_PRSB518-Lenin_28_naval_mission.wowsreplay

You have to report them manually.

When nobody does that, nothing happens.

[HassenderZerhacker]

but what mechanism is there to punish players who don't follow my orders?

can they be keelhauled or something?

[KillStealBoss]

12 minutes ago, HassenderZerhacker said:

but what mechanism is there to punish players who don't follow my orders?

can they be keelhauled or something?

not about following orders but spamming commands all battle, this is the second time I forgot commands can be blocked by muting the person not disabling chat.

[lossi_2018]

I want more commands tbh. I have things to say and I prefer not using the chat

[KillStealBoss]

3 hours ago, lossi_2018 said:

I want more commands tbh. I have things to say and I prefer not using the chat

yeah me too, like "wait a moment" or "kite away". Also "set smokescreen" should be pointed to the DD as like when you need support from him or you tell team to cover him.

But here the guy was useless and he only spammed those commands. He didnt even shot a single salvo, all batle being way behind BBs in a German DD.

[ForlornSailor]

14 minutes ago, MacArthur92 said:

Also "set smokescreen" should be pointed to the DD as like when you need support from him or you tell team to cover him.

 

Id also like to be able to point that at myself because I actually regulary smoke up random guys in trouble and Id like them them (well some of them, others just do w/e they want anyway) to be confident to slow down.

[KillStealBoss]

2 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

Id also like to be able to point that at myself because I actually regulary smoke up random guys in trouble and Id like them them (well some of them, others just do w/e they want anyway) to be confident to slow down.

well it should be working as if you point at anything except allied ship - you should get such command as "I'm deploying smoke". 

[floribe2000]

I removed the replay because it violates the "No naming and shaming" rule. Report severe cases of command spam to customer support.

You can also add a player who spams to your ignore list so you won't see his command spam anymore.

[Cambera_1]

10 hours ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

Id also like to be able to point that at myself because I actually regulary smoke up random guys in trouble and Id like them them (well some of them, others just do w/e they want anyway) to be confident to slow down.

The use of the smoke consumable should put a message into the chat in the same way as the use of Radar and Hydro.

This could then show a positive response to a request for smoke and potentially prevent two smoke equipped ships from smoking in the same place.

 

(Sorry, we are talking about Players, no way would they notice that their neighbour had smoked!)

 

Users when using binoculars often don't see the deployment of friendly smoke. (Yes they should not be stuck in Binocular mode all the time.)

[MementoMori_6030]

Vor 1 Stunde, Cambera_1 sagte:

The use of the smoke consumable should put a message into the chat in the same way as the use of Radar and Hydro.

This could then show a positive response to a request for smoke and potentially prevent two smoke equipped ships from smoking in the same place.

 

(Sorry, we are talking about Players, no way would they notice that their neighbour had smoked!)

 

Users when using binoculars often don't see the deployment of friendly smoke. (Yes they should not be stuck in Binocular mode all the time.)

It would also make sense to prevent the F5 key from working if players whose ships do not feature a smoke consumable are pinged by notorious tools ignorants. And generally blocking the F6 key if there are no CV in the game. And generally blocking the F5 and F7 keys for those full health BB who are camping way back and are not even in range to shoot or be shot at.

[Shadeshots]

The only command I want adding is, 'I'm spotted'. Half of the current ones are absolutely useless.

[ironhammer500]

2 minutes ago, SHADEW0LF said:

The only command I want adding is, 'I'm spotted'. Half of the current ones are absolutely useless.

Also id like a consumable cooldown to say I have X time on radar or i have X time on cool down would help tell team mates my stuff is on cool down, the others are useless imo.

[neorvo]

15 hours ago, floribe2000 said:

I removed the replay because it violates the "No naming and shaming" rule. Report severe cases of command spam to customer support.

You can also add a player who spams to your ignore list so you won't see his command spam anymore.

It is possible after placing a player on the blacklist, you can never see him anymore? The ignore list is the same as the blacklist? I found many times in my co-op battles, players with a small yellow box in the game list, playing again in my team. I thought the blacklist also avoid playing again with people we had a conflict in the same team.

[Admiral_Oily_Discharge]

add a command to tell your team that you are chatbanned

[Lootboxer]

3 hours ago, neorvo said:

It is possible after placing a player on the blacklist, you can never see him anymore? The ignore list is the same as the blacklist? I found many times in my co-op battles, players with a small yellow box in the game list, playing again in my team. I thought the blacklist also avoid playing again with people we had a conflict in the same team.

That would be perfect way to get super unicum WR with a bit of dedication after a year of blocking every one with above 45% WR soon I would become potato king clubbing them all day long, never seeing  unicums again  playing on the speshul server 

[floribe2000]

Vor 7 Stunden, neorvo sagte:

It is possible after placing a player on the blacklist, you can never see him anymore? The ignore list is the same as the blacklist? I found many times in my co-op battles, players with a small yellow box in the game list, playing again in my team. I thought the blacklist also avoid playing again with people we had a conflict in the same team.

No, blocking/ignoring a player only hides his chat messages. Everything else could be abused easily.

[SV_Kompresor]

I just teamkill them if I happen get the chance. Can't ping if they're dead.

[Donar79]

Am 26.5.2020 um 23:44, MacArthur92 sagte:

all batle being way behind BBs in a German DD.

Now it gets fishy how could he have been behind the map border huh

[KillStealBoss]

12 hours ago, Donar79 said:

Now it gets fishy how could he have been behind the map border huh

Well he was in the "pushing" flank that collapsed because he refused to spot, he just stayed in spawn just spamming commands.

[KillStealBoss]

19 hours ago, neorvo said:

It is possible after placing a player on the blacklist, you can never see him anymore? The ignore list is the same as the blacklist? I found many times in my co-op battles, players with a small yellow box in the game list, playing again in my team. I thought the blacklist also avoid playing again with people we had a conflict in the same team.

Well it doesn't work as we think it should....

On 5/27/2020 at 9:52 AM, floribe2000 said:

I removed the replay because it violates the "No naming and shaming" rule. Report severe cases of command spam to customer support.

You can also add a player who spams to your ignore list so you won't see his command spam anymore.

Well I didn't know about that - I didn't mention his name though I thought the replay itself won't be an issue.