Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Admirality

Ochakov? Bagration? Mikoyan?

14 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[CZSL]
Players
135 posts
4,789 battles

Why have all this project ships in game if we can have Krasnyj Kavkaz? Half brother of Krasnyj Krym :Smile_teethhappy:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_cruiser_Krasny_Kavkaz

 

took 12 years to complet,  4x 180mm high velocity guns with barel life 55-70 rounds - just for 20 min battle in WOWS.

 

And quite interesting service history with Guards award...

 

:Smile_bajan2:

KrasnyyKavkaz1930s1.jpg

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
4,656 posts
17,529 battles

I watched the armada video where they discussed the three possible plans they had for the Ochakov. 
One of two plans was a 6x2 130mm layout. This might have interesting to make it a ‘baby’ Smolensk. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
[CR33D]
Players
3,561 posts
32,369 battles
1 hour ago, gopher31 said:

One of two plans was a 6x2 130mm layout. This might have interesting to make it a ‘baby’ Smolensk. 

 

Please, having one Smolensk is already bad enough. Actually if they went with this version for T10, instead of 4x4 130mm, I think it would be way more balanced, or at least acceptable, then the current Smolensk. And would still be way more realistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
9,441 battles
2 hours ago, gopher31 said:

I watched the armada video where they discussed the three possible plans they had for the Ochakov. 
One of two plans was a 6x2 130mm layout. This might have interesting to make it a ‘baby’ Smolensk. 
 

Give it half a year and it'll be the new T6 cruiser Novgorod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
4,576 posts
1 hour ago, Admirality said:

Is WarThunder better than WOWS?

For ships? Heck no. It's different but there is absolutely no balance. It just looks prettier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
5,288 posts
22,894 battles
4 hours ago, Admirality said:

Is WarThunder better than WOWS?

if you think WOWS is play pay to win Warthunder is just blatent they dont even try to hide it..

 

They do things like having a Prem version of a certain plane a lower tier than the near identical tech tree vertion

 

 

Edit 

Changed play to pay.   :Smile_facepalm: thanks @Europizza

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
9,441 battles
2 hours ago, Admirality said:

Is WarThunder better than WOWS?

People who complain about HE spam in WoWS should experience WT's stock ships with no fire extinguisher. One lucky shot puts you on fire and you basically can watch your slow, but inevitable demise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Players
1,572 posts
2 hours ago, Admirality said:

Is WarThunder better than WOWS?

Tried WT= :Smile_coin::Smile_coin::Smile_coin::Smile_coin:  :Smile_coin: Better the Devil you know WeeG = :Smile_coin: :Smile_coin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,430 posts
58 minutes ago, T0byJug said:

if you think WOWS is play to win Warthunder is just blatent they dont even try to hide it..

 

:cat_bubble:

<3

<3

<3

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,118 posts

With its flaws, Wows is the best ship sim I've ever played with the exception of the SH3 which was subs specific

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
7,941 posts
16,791 battles
3 hours ago, Admirality said:

Is WarThunder better than WOWS?

I've given the tanks version a prod (an old friend is very keen on WT), but found it rather frustrating. Prefer the WOT game-play, based on an admittedly short exposure, and assume the ships bit will be a similar experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
5,288 posts
22,894 battles
1 hour ago, Europizza said:

:cat_bubble:

<3

<3

<3

 

LOL come on it would not be T0byjug if there was not a stupppid mistake........ LOL corretced thanks

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×