Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Furius_Marius

Entered Service vs Year of design vs uncompleted-converted

2 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
257 posts
10,364 battles

Hello everybody! 

Probably this topic was already commented. I think i would be interesting that the game info makes a difference between ships that were just design and ships that were partially build or completed. Like this you can see that ship existed somehow(unfinished) or was converted into another kind of ship, but that they really were into building the ship.

 

By seeing the just "year of design" seems like Amagi and Kremlin are the same.  But Amagi was actually in the process of building and got destroyed in the Kanto earthquake and Akagi(same class) was converted to Aircraft carrier. 4 ships were laid down.

Another examples can be: Ibuki (was launched and then they started to converted to carrier). Graf Zeppelin. (very advance stage) Prinz Eitel Friedrich, Izmail (Borodino class), Sovietsky Soyuz was also started, even Stalingrad...

 

Its not fair to make it like its the same as Kremlin, Conqueror, Smolensk, G.Kurfurst, Azuma, Republique, Venezia, Ohio, Puerto Rico... Ships that were just designs or interpretation of WG compared to ships in different stages of construction that existed. 

 

What do you think?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TACHA]
Players
1,210 posts

It's always nice to have more historical information, and it would be good to know about ships that were in process of building but for whatever reason never made it into service. Then again, it would probably be pretty embarrassing if WG were obliged to be specific about 'this design was scribbled on the back of a napkin' or even 'we just made this one up completely'...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×