Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
ImperialAdmiral

Tier IX German BB Ludendorff

124 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,274 battles

Looks like WG just doesn't care to create interesting new ships anymore. My comment:

 

Spoiler

Worf_9e97f2_120725.jpg

 

  • Cool 9
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AAO]
Players
1,597 posts
21,902 battles

Interesting. I wonder what concept those ships will follow and when we'll get then in testing :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CAIN]
Players
5,207 posts
25,714 battles

Eh. A TIX Odin. 

 

I would have preferred a KM BB with 457mm or larger guns. 

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BS4]
Players
238 posts
18,079 battles

Lazy asset flip is lazy

 

 

 

...Still, looks like this thing has only 20mm flakvierlings and 105mm AA guns

 

But! it has a quad torpedo launcher on the weather deck below the crane!!!

So essentially T9 Tirpitz

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,620 battles
3 minutes ago, aleksi111 said:

So essentially T9 Tirpitz

That would be of interest to me (I'm always potentially keen on enormously fat DDs).

At least until it gets the usual treatment from the it's-German-so-it-must-be-nerfed-Comrade nerf bat...

  • Cool 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,588 posts
6,830 battles

While for me it's very underwhelming and kind of reflects some sort of laziness from WG (instead of coming up with something new, they take a ship and change a few things; its' nothing new to WoWS, but whatever).

 

It said on reddit that she trades the aircrafts for Tirpitz torps and "improoved" AA, with the quad MK-103s (see image below; love that muzzle brake btw :Smile_trollface:)

zerstoer+45.jpg

 

I hope that she'll have at least 2.0 sigma, otherwise she's going to be a worse FdG imo. 

 

however, i do have a bit of hope for it tho, due to the fact that she's going to be fo coal and so far WG never screwed up any Coal ship, in fact every coal ship (i mean Tier 5 and above) is from decent to just BS, so i hope that thet don't screw this one up.

 

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALONE]
Modder
2,485 posts
15,343 battles

Also a T6-premium CV (a mini-zeppelin) was datamined (no source here - so may be fake, beware)

 

rk4mcpv8xkx41.jpg

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BS4]
Players
238 posts
18,079 battles
8 minutes ago, Verblonde said:

At least until it gets the usual treatment from the it's-German-so-it-must-be-nerfed-Comrade nerf bat...

 

Que in sup bar (even for German ships) gun firing angles, main guns rivaling Mikasa in derpyness and 35s or so reload on those 380mm guns... which I remind got directly nerfed by the plating change that increased 27mm and thicker plating on cruisers

 

(IMO, they should have given the CA's 30mm upper belt and central deck instead of the mixed 27mm/30mm, as ships posessing 406mm guns are bit more common at T8-T10 vs 380mm gun ships)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,620 battles
4 minutes ago, Smeggo said:

Also a T6-premium CV (a mini-zeppelin)

If such a thing came to pass, I'd probably be persuaded (if it wasn't unutterably awful) - I only really play CVs in Ops, which means I always have a use for T6, especially if they're premium...

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
1,649 posts
9,828 battles

I mean to be fair I didn't see the stats but FDG with those 380 and fast reload is a pretty decent ship in right hands.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles
1 hour ago, ImperialAdmiral said:

So basically a FDG with 4x3 380 mm

 

Well that is..interesting. Would need to see more about her to decide if it's interesting in a good way or a bad way.

 

As far as the name is concerned, eh the man was something of a national hero after WW1 (how much he deserved to be considered that is neither here nor there) and a dedicated National Socialist, so, yea, I can see the KM naming a ship after him..

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
595 posts
Vor 5 Minuten, ImperialAdmiral sagte:

I mean to be fair I didn't see the stats but FDG with those 380 and fast reload is a pretty decent ship in right hands.

This.

 

However finding a niche same tier as Musashi, Missouri, Jean Bart, Georgia - even then Pan Asian thing looks strong - might be tricky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
21 minutes ago, Smeggo said:

Also a T6-premium CV (a mini-zeppelin) was datamined (no source here - so may be fake, beware)

 

rk4mcpv8xkx41.jpg

WG is going with loli version of "big" characters?:cap_wander:

 

Weeb warning

Spoiler

AL some time ago introduced, mostly for lols, "loli" version of certain characters, including Graf Zeppelin

Zeppy

Spoiler

Zeppy.png

 

and Graf Zeppelin proper

Spoiler

Graf_Zeppelin.png

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
1,649 posts
9,828 battles
5 minutes ago, thisismalacoda said:

This.

 

However finding a niche same tier as Musashi, Missouri, Jean Bart, Georgia - even then Pan Asian thing looks strong - might be tricky.

She is like Tirpitz big sister. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles

So lil,zeppy and alcase gkf love child. Or fatter odin.

 

the first is interesting the second will probs be meh but i hope not since i wouldnt mind a german coal bb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
286 posts
9,096 battles

Well Early prototype GZ design is nice for T6. Biggest CV at T6, I hope she gets Stuka's as well.

 

But T9 BB looks bad. Armor wise she's good and maybe turret angles maybe improved because of removal of hangar and Torpedos but she still looks like downgraded FDG. No AA, Worse reload, Smaller guns, Worse Rudder shift with 22 seconds(instead 17.5 seconds of FDG). 

 

I wish we got H42 rather then this imaginary BB again but let's not loose hope.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
WoWs Wiki Team, In AlfaTesters, Beta Tester, Quality Poster
2,314 posts
15,966 battles

Guns are identical to Bismarcks. But 4x3 guns with 32s reload instead of 4x2 with 26s reload and 1km longer range than FDG.

image.thumb.png.d20a6aedd4c8e9e17f7048a8ec00a80b.png

 

Gun angles are even worse than FDGs.

image.thumb.png.cae8a89c757735364b658b6adf1ef36d.png

 

Torpedos are the same as Tirpitz in terms of speed, damage and range (6km range, 64knts). Launcher angles are slightly better than Tirpitz.

image.thumb.png.3e1d8273cf15dfdf942494181278b1bc.png

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×