Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Update 0.9.3.1: Hayate for Free XP

149 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[C10C]
Players
256 posts
36,652 battles

I dont care what kind of ship WOWS offer. If it means 2 M of Exp my answer will be always no. 

 

Thank you.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[INTRO]
[INTRO]
Players
1,518 posts
28,855 battles
1 hour ago, MarcoGn97 said:

People voted FXP, people got what they wanted.

 

I voted Coal, and now I have a port slot that will be occupied by something else :Smile_trollface:

If we'd voted coal then WG would've put another ship for FXP. We can't win when WG shuffles the deck.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
1,649 posts
9,828 battles

I really want her and I don't care what others think.

 

Also the video is really honest about the ship for the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBF-]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters
8,315 posts
2 hours ago, 416taylor said:

I meen, How many småland is there in the game. 

As for now, at EU serwer, 1995. Not including players with private profile.

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POI--]
Players
22 posts
2,931 battles
1 hour ago, HMS_Kilinowski said:

We all were speculating how this ship would be included into some event, maybe some girly-anime thing.

And now here it is.

Out of thin air:

Hayate.

 

Makes me wonder: What took you so long, Wargaming?

I don't remember any ST talking about last minute changes. Did WG change anything?

It must be the concealment:

The last known version had 6.1km concealment, which is a lot (500m) worse than Shima.

So if it's now "slightly worse", it must be ~5.8km.

Am I right or am I once more the victim of deceitful marketing?

The reviews were not overly enthusiastic about this ship. I think Flamu explicitly stated it would not be worth 2M FXP. So now it is 2M FXP. What changed in the meantime that might make this ship worth it?

 

Ofc it had to be 2M FXP. Otherwise the owners of Smaland would feel cheated. But Smaland seems to fit into the current meta with AA, long range torps and radar. Hayate has no gimmicks. How is it supposed to be competitive?

I think they mentioned in the Armada video that it has a base concealment of 7.7km (which is pretty bad considering its lack of firepower), which should still be 6.1 with skills and modules

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POI--]
Players
22 posts
2,931 battles
1 hour ago, HMS_Kilinowski said:

We all were speculating how this ship would be included into some event, maybe some girly-anime thing.

And now here it is.

Out of thin air:

Hayate.

 

Makes me wonder: What took you so long, Wargaming?

I don't remember any ST talking about last minute changes. Did WG change anything?

It must be the concealment:

The last known version had 6.1km concealment, which is a lot (500m) worse than Shima.

So if it's now "slightly worse", it must be ~5.8km.

Am I right or am I once more the victim of deceitful marketing?

The reviews were not overly enthusiastic about this ship. I think Flamu explicitly stated it would not be worth 2M FXP. So now it is 2M FXP. What changed in the meantime that might make this ship worth it?

 

Ofc it had to be 2M FXP. Otherwise the owners of Smaland would feel cheated. But Smaland seems to fit into the current meta with AA, long range torps and radar. Hayate has no gimmicks. How is it supposed to be competitive?

People voted for FXP so they got it. It has the gimmick of being a mediocre IJN premium:Smile-_tongue:

  • Funny 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOFTC]
Players
7,658 posts
13,680 battles

I will buy it, because I play primarly IJN. Though I agree with most comments here, it's way to expensive. Also it has classical Wargaming IJN design: Somewhere an advantage, with dozens of disadvantages.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
35 posts
26,999 battles

Anothertime the comunity got what they wanted and complains that WG doesn't listen to them....

CV's make them more accesable to players-->CV reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeework-->CV OP please nerf

Free xp is easy to farm they said--> voted for it--> got it --> Tooooooooooomuch free xp

and people wonder why things happen like the smolensk ?!

All i can say i will get her play a few games have fun with a game and that's it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-NSC-]
Players
373 posts
14,963 battles

So depressed.. Soooooooooooooo depressed.. Well, not really, I mean, I get to save 2m f.exp.. bette spend it on Småland if I absolutely have to..

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
40 posts
17,080 battles
2 hours ago, MacArthur92 said:

This ship will be only for collectors. Smaland has it special gameplay, it's a bit different than what we have in the game. Hayate is a IJN version of the Gearing. It's not bad but.... it's nothing new. and this price is crazy ofc, I'll need another 6 months (after getting the Smaland) to obtain it. However 90% of the playerbase won't have enough free exp for both (and many won't be having enough for 1 of them)

31,793 battles 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
9,337 posts
16,179 battles

2 Mio because ingame ressource "inflation"

 

Inflation caused by WG themselves with their absurd flood of +XXX% camos and signals.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOFTC]
Players
7,658 posts
13,680 battles
Just now, Zemeritt said:

2 Mio because ingame ressource "inflation"

 

Inflation caused by WG themselves with their absurd flood of +XXX% camos and signals.

imo they should remove all camos and add multiple camos for a ship just for cosmetic effects

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
9,337 posts
16,179 battles
Just now, Pikkozoikum said:

imo they should remove all camos and add multiple camos for a ship just for cosmetic effects

 

They'll never do that because ppl keep on buying these things for the progress.

There is a reason everything in this game is focussed around T10:

 

Any player, who want to participate in (most) events has to get to T10 asap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOFTC]
Players
7,658 posts
13,680 battles
Just now, Zemeritt said:

 

They'll never do that because ppl keep on buying these things for the progress.

There is a reason everything in this game is focussed around T10:

 

Any player, who want to participate in (most) events has to get to T10 asap.

Anyone is buying those ugly camos? I mean I got so many just by playing this game. Though I would buy nice, (historically) looking camos. So that makes money as well

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
9,337 posts
16,179 battles
1 minute ago, Pikkozoikum said:

Anyone is buying those ugly camos? I mean I got so many just by playing this game. Though I would buy nice, (historically) looking camos. So that makes money as well

 

Yes, otherwise they wouldn't appear in the shop everytime with also increasing prices. Looks like the demand is there.

 

Players like us are in the minority tho.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
272 posts
307 battles

CC's reviewed it and called it mehh, average, a ship with no real identity neither a torp boat nor a gun boat and hit with the anti Japanese hammer WG seem to have held for several years now. 750 fxp for  Missouri and Musashi I get is a bit low, 1mill for Alaska I get and about right, 1.4 million maybe for a T10 ship...again about right but for a mehhh t10 none russian freemium you laughingly value alongside the Smolensk. I think not. WG are getting tighter and tighter with content these days, gold issued along with new ship releases in the premium shop bundles down from 9k to now 3k, doubloons removed from xmas crates as compensation, less flags, less camo's also in these crates, free tech tree ships with early access bundles that could cost you upto 91k gold to buy all the bundles. Now upto 250k for coal ships and FXP ships now costing 2 million, a 100% increase on the last t9 release, really? 100% for a 1 tier step up. 

 

WG are doing this to milk away accumulated resources from those they consider whales in the hope they keep buying these over inflated premium shop packages. I have almost every ship on my main uptill xmas this year but WG's current shady practices and big reduction in value of anything currently on sale has made me put away my card, if the plan was to encourage more or continued purchasing reducing value of everything while increasing the price is not the way to go about it. You have put me off spending not encouraged me to spend more money on content with less and less value. 

 

Yuwatsit...a forgettable ship with an unforgettable price tag. Get real, technically a free ship, but not in time or effort required to accumulate such a vast sum of fxp.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
61,968 battles
1 hour ago, ImoutoSaikou said:

31,793 battles 

 

ok nad? 

some people have surpassed the 55k.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-NSC-]
Players
373 posts
14,963 battles
1 hour ago, Pikkozoikum said:

Anyone is buying those ugly camos? I mean I got so many just by playing this game. Though I would buy nice, (historically) looking camos. So that makes money as well

 

1 hour ago, Zemeritt said:

 

They'll never do that because ppl keep on buying these things for the progress.

There is a reason everything in this game is focussed around T10:

 

Any player, who want to participate in (most) events has to get to T10 asap.

 

1 hour ago, Zemeritt said:

2 Mio because ingame ressource "inflation"

 

Inflation caused by WG themselves with their absurd flood of +XXX% camos and signals.

Thought I could quote all of yous at the same time.

 

This year there is MUCH less camo inflation than any year before, thus far. None of these camouflages can be obtained outside of missions (you can't buy them), you can of course buy the super expensive stupid camo bundle that contains all camouflages and get 5 of each, but even that would not get you very far. So inflation ? Not really, as they clipped the best you could buy (pi camouflage) from the store this year, last year and the year before they were made available, this year none. Not even for quests. The entire Pi day was silently skipped, why? Because the camouflage is awesome for farming captain and free exp and as such WG would have an interest in limiting the availability of such camouflages.. Nothing more to it. So no, no more influx, that's bollocks. There are monkeys (like me) that have a lot of dragon flags, so with a good game I can quite easily rack up 20-25k free exp with dragon flags and the Black camo (150% free exp). That still means 40-50 really good games.

 

Whole lotta MEH.. 

 

Rather spend the F.exp on getting Ohio as it is a better boat than either two, but.. We'll see..  Wonder what'll come in the christmas containers this year, not going to buy a single ship just to see what will be available.

 

-Fes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOFTC]
Players
7,658 posts
13,680 battles
12 minutes ago, WascallyWabbit said:

CC's reviewed it and called it mehh, average, a ship with no real identity neither a torp boat nor a gun boat and hit with the anti Japanese hammer WG seem to have held for several years now

There is no hybrid DD for the IJN, so it's actually something special for IJN players, though the stats are not that great, it seems. With 5.9 concealment, it would be great.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
61,968 battles
1 minute ago, Pikkozoikum said:

There is no hybrid DD for the IJN, so it's actually something special for IJN players, though the stats are not that great, it seems. With 5.9 concealment, it would be great.

But with 6.1 km it's not so great :cap_old:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
272 posts
307 battles
32 minutes ago, Pikkozoikum said:

There is no hybrid DD for the IJN, so it's actually something special for IJN players, though the stats are not that great, it seems. With 5.9 concealment, it would be great.

I hear you there, for sure it does fill in a gap in the roster but point i'm making for 2 million fxp...it is a bit mehhh, infact for 2 million...its a lot mehhh lol, and indicative of the continued fall in value of ships, packages and bundles while the price steadily increases. Wasn't the Tirpitz the first t8 premium at £24.95, now a t8 BB will set you back around £39.95. I don't mind spending in a game, I spent a small fortune here, WoT and warthunder among others, but the value I feel i'm getting is way less than 2 years ago and many of these ships are just reskinned tech tree ships, not only is value falling but WG are just getting lazy. Tweak stats, stick a skin on it...£40 please, or have some credits a few crap flags and bundle it with a reskinned tech tree ship for £59.

 

As you say the Japanese lines could do with some love after years of neglect, a hybrid dd does fill a gap but for what it brings the 2 million price tag is obscene.

 

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
1 hour ago, Capt_Popei said:

Too expensive like Smalland. I prefer two Tier 9 ships. :Smile-_tongue:

expensive by what way? by play game? every battle what you make gives you free xp.

if you calculate that 2mil free xp for only real money then yes, maybe little bit  too expensive.

expensive is also make those ships and add them to game

 

  • Boring 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
231 posts
3 hours ago, Hanse77SWE said:

If we'd voted coal then WG would've put another ship for FXP. We can't win when WG shuffles the deck.

Agreed! Hands up who's got Marceau and happy wit her ;)

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×