Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Excavatus

General CV related discussions.

13,185 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
11 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

tenor.gif

You CV defending apologist

Spoiler

:Smile_trollface:

 

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles

r.i.p smoll2azer defender of cv's guardian of salt.

 

attacked by lord floloreeru of twitchdom.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,543 posts
16,031 battles

In all fairness tho, it wouldn't surprise me if he actually knew El2azer but still did the name and shaming just to give his audience what he wanted. Flolo fans are not exactly the most level headed and thoughtful of the bunch so naturally anything that reinforces their "Delete CVs" mentality means more subs, more donations and more bits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles
Just now, OVanBruce said:

In all fairness tho, it wouldn't surprise me if he actually knew El2azer but still did the name and shaming just to give his audience what he wanted. Flolo fans are not exactly the most level headed and thoughtful of the bunch so naturally anything that reinforces their "Delete CVs" mentality means more subs, more donations and more bits.

Ye, i saw some of his base go a bit mental at chat when weegee announced a new dockyard mission. Although its odin so i doubt that will be popular at all.

Anyone who spends 35k doubloons on dat is bloody mug of the highest order. Unless they are collectors (sod knows why you would collect virtual stuff, collect models they last longer and look nicer and don't just yeet themselves when someone switches a plug off).

 

@El2aZeR im curious do you know flamu at all? Or was this some random poke from him?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,543 posts
16,031 battles

I wish I was cool enough to be shittalked by twitch ecelebs. A bit jelly of El2azer now. Guess I must up my CV play, only 65% winrate. :cap_book:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles
6 minutes ago, CptBarney said:

@El2aZeR im curious do you know flamu at all? Or was this some random poke from him?

 

Wouldn't know if he knows me.

And aw, the clip got deleted. But I liked my title as CV apologist.

 

Guess I'll go back to hating on CVs then.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles
1 minute ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Wouldn't know if he knows me.

And aw, the clip got deleted. But I liked my title as CV apologist.

 

Guess I'll go back to hating on CVs then.

Also lol, not surprised.

Petition to weegee for unique forum title change?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POP]
Weekend Tester
1,433 posts

IIRC somebody corrected him on the stream afterwards so there was relatively little drama involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles
Vor 6 Stunden, AndyHill sagte:

IIRC somebody corrected him on the stream afterwards so there was relatively little drama involved.

It's just a little sad how little in touch the CCs are with the community. 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles
42 minutes ago, Yoshanai said:

It's kind of defeating the point of being a "Community Contributer" then doesn't it? 

True, also a shame there isnt more guides on ships how to play etc. Like updated versions, ichasegaming seems to be the only one who bothers with this too be honest.

 

I like flamu for when hes honest about things, but i like how instead of just taking the time to research el2azer’s posts he just names and shames him.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
392 posts
3,934 battles
On 5/8/2020 at 12:36 PM, CptBarney said:

True, also a shame there isnt more guides on ships how to play etc. Like updated versions, ichasegaming seems to be the only one who bothers with this too be honest.

 

I like flamu for when hes honest about things, but i like how instead of just taking the time to research el2azer’s posts he just names and shames him.

Seems I missed something...

 

Aren't both of them on the same side and think CVs are broken and do not fit in the game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,032 posts
19,168 battles
12 minutes ago, steveraptor said:

Seems I missed something...

 

Aren't both of them on the same side and think CVs are broken and do not fit in the game?

Yes but flamu mistook El2as stance on stream. 

The fascinating thing to me is that he doesn't know El2a. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,374 posts
11,735 battles
On 5/8/2020 at 1:42 AM, AndyHill said:

IIRC somebody corrected him on the stream afterwards so there was relatively little drama involved.

 

That was one of us ^^ I was surprised, that he didnt went to stat shame again. Thats what he did with me, when I corrected him once XD (he had to dig deep to paint that picture, quite amusing actually).

 

3 minutes ago, Yoshanai said:

Yes but flamu mistook El2as stance on stream.  

 

He is completly out of touch with anything surrounding CVs. And always has been. He was the vocal leader or "CV rework will be awesome" during the testing - and for one reason only. He hated RTS CVs and thought, reworked CVs will nerf the class into the ground. Yes, he actually thought that after testing them himself. How he thinks now about CV rework its pretty obvious. But yea, his audience loves it and throws money at him, everytime he unleashes a blind rage without any facts.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POP]
Weekend Tester
1,433 posts

Well I can understand why he was (I don't really remember if he was or wasn't though), I myself thought that at least it couldn't possibly be worse than what we had back then. Also when people first tried the low tier carriers, they felt very underwhelming, which was somewhat promising. In reality, though, the rework isn't any better than the earlier version, so it's also easy to understand why he hates it now.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,001 posts
7,787 battles
57 minutes ago, steveraptor said:

Seems I missed something...

 

 

Me too, can anyone enlighten?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles
40 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

That was one of us ^^ I was surprised, that he didnt went to stat shame again. Thats what he did with me, when I corrected him once XD (he had to dig deep to paint that picture, quite amusing actually).

Never knew he did that, did you make a donation with voice chat?

40 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

 

He is completly out of touch with anything surrounding CVs. And always has been. He was the vocal leader or "CV rework will be awesome" during the testing - and for one reason only. He hated RTS CVs and thought, reworked CVs will nerf the class into the ground. Yes, he actually thought that after testing them himself. How he thinks now about CV rework its pretty obvious. But yea, his audience loves it and throws money at him, everytime he unleashes a blind rage without any facts.

Seems, like it. Hes a very good player yes, but seems bad at being a CC half the time.

 

Oh well i hope weegee adds miss sevastapol as a tier 10 RB cruiser with 380mm's :Smile_trollface:

Salt mine would be so full it would create a new sahara desert. :cap_haloween:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[R7S]
Players
2,179 posts
12,302 battles

I was just in a tier 3 ship with no AA guns in a game with 2 enemy CVs, can you imagine how did I feel ?:Smile_child:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,374 posts
11,735 battles
2 minutes ago, CptBarney said:

Never knew he did that, did you make a donation with voice chat?

 

Nah I just called him out in general chat. It triggered him so hard, that he engaged me :D

 

3 minutes ago, CptBarney said:

Hes a very good player yes, but seems bad at being a CC half the time.

 

True for both. Honestly, I think at this point, he is doing it for the money. Just have to roughly calculate subsribers and his tonedeaf tuesday and you know his income per month - and thats a low guess. Cant blame him, it pays more then a "real" job. But his recent influence on the community is ... questionable.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
402 posts
27,265 battles
1 hour ago, Wulf_Ace said:

I was just in a tier 3 ship with no AA guns in a game with 2 enemy CVs, can you imagine how did I feel ?:Smile_child:

everyone had that experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,636 posts

Just had a Lexington losing his crap over a Halland killing all his planes in seconds, screaming it was unbalanced. Explaining to him that he just learned not to mindlessly attack a Halland in his Lex, he started crying about how he already has to make 'hard tactical choices' and this was just too much. Explaining to him AGAIN that he just learned to be careful around this ONE DD, he got really upset.

 

:Smile_sceptic:

 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[G-O-M]
Players
2,597 posts
13,191 battles
On 5/7/2020 at 8:27 AM, Miragetank90 said:

 

Hm, well...

 

Capture.JPG.ffb9146884d9e87e2921c8a123353724.JPG

 

So I'd say in that sense(increase in players), it succeeded. 

This heading description is meaningless. If this is about RTS & reworked CVs only - there should only be 2 graph lines (not 4).

On 5/7/2020 at 9:17 AM, Miragetank90 said:

@CptBarney @Yoshanai @AgarwaenME

 

Sorry, forgot this part...

 

Because I'm dumb.

 

Capture.JPG.400202ba643a6caa1fdec1065384b10d.JPG

 

Sorry. Hopefully it makes more sense now.

K, all four classes. The dates this graph covers & the intervals shown are not apparent.

On 5/7/2020 at 9:38 AM, El2aZeR said:

 

Given that this is % of total amount of battles it clearly doesn't compensate for population differences.

E.g. if the total amount of players went down but the amount of CV players stayed the same, that'd show an increase in the share of CV battles played.

I'm sure wondering why they're not simply displaying the actual player numbers. :cap_hmm:

Exactly. 'What' does the above graph represent? My guess is just the relative differences in what ship classes are being played over time.

Statistical analyses are good & all but only if the exact parameters of what is being shown are crystal clear (which here they are not).

Then there is the data itself. There is the old statistical math saying, "Garbage In = Garbage Out"

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
2,626 posts
18,696 battles

@Aethervoxx As I mentioned on the previous page, the dates start from just before rework and end on the day of posting. The last date written on the graph at the bottom right is the 1st of May. 

 

As for intervals, it's on a monthly basis, but I realise it's hard to see from that screenshot. 

 

What you're seeing is the result from all of last year from the 1st of January 2019 up till now. 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×