Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Excavatus

General CV related discussions.

13,185 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[FJAKA]
Players
457 posts
15,659 battles
On 2/5/2021 at 7:35 PM, DFens_666 said:

 

When people write "weak CV" in any forum related to wows, their game should be swapped against "hello kitty island adventures" just because they are so freaking dumb :cap_fainting:

 

cv_meme.jpg.e17b2b34422ecca1e74cb1e029fbdf77.jpg

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
20 minutes ago, guy_incognito79 said:

Now if we could find a cure for that revolting FDR nonsense! xD

Well it's not that strong IMO. Not OP, as not everyone can do large damage with it or carry games.

In fact I think for many people it will be their worst ever CV, and they'll hate it and be crap with it (like me...). 

 

However at the same time it is the most broken. So people that are actually any good will just screw everybody over. 

As in. really hard and up every orifice possible. :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2 posts
6,225 battles

I don't mind CV and like to play this class myself. However, whenever I play my Rusky battleship with no AA I more often than not get two CVs.

 

Yet another interesting quirk in the matching criteria.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
6,636 posts
24,864 battles
10 hours ago, Subtle_Bubonic said:

I don't mind CV and like to play this class myself. However, whenever I play my Rusky battleship with no AA I more often than not get two CVs.

 

Yet another interesting quirk in the matching criteria.

Some who call it "Deserved Punishment"

:cap_haloween:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,101 posts
15,043 battles

CVs are cretinously badly implemented, there's no easy way to say it.
Recently, I've had T8 CVs with 210 games total, 41% WR who did nothing. Challenged after the game, it was the 1st CV game they played.
Last game, T10 CV, 1,600 games and 43% WR. He did nothing either, and I've lost the will to even bother taking the games seriously.
I've definitely lost the will to hand over any more cash, why the hell would anyone want to pay for this dogshite?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
[THESO]
Moderator
4,705 posts
17,888 battles
On 2/7/2021 at 2:04 AM, guy_incognito79 said:

Now if we could find a cure for that revolting FDR nonsense! xD

I'm happy to say, that cure is in testing :) 

I'm sorry that I cannot talk about her.. but last night the enemy FDR was..

??? what happened to my planes? how did?? what??? what kind of a black wall was that?? how?? !!! 

May be he was a very bad player I don't know.. but It was fun to delete half a squadron in one big booom! :D

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
1 minute ago, arquata2019 said:

hi good people of this thread  how do i fight an halland in my midway with dive bombers without losing many of them?

thx

Just do not attack him straight-in, avoid Halland like the plague - trick him to use the DEF AA then go in.

Come back when he used it. Best if he is spotted by teammates. Keep him spotted and hope they do the job.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles
8 minutes ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

What do you mean by that?

 

Austin most likely.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,543 posts
16,031 battles
On 2/6/2021 at 9:53 PM, Sunleader said:

Huh ?

What do you want to Discuss about me ?

Who is that? Some Chinese knock off? Have some real japanese Kaga :Smile_trollface:
 

image.thumb.png.bd044d4f65475ac65055b76359d74af5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
4 hours ago, Excavatus said:

May be he was a very bad player I don't know.. but It was fun to delete half a squadron in one big booom! :D

Halland can do it, so can Minotaur and Worcester. DM slightly less so. 

Slow planes + unaware CV-pilot will have that happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNR-]
Beta Tester
2,514 posts
20,269 battles
10 minutes ago, CptBarney said:

Oh lordy lord. Lol, im guessing that has mad AA?

What is AA? you mean pif paff that does nothing? 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
5,710 posts
13,400 battles
1 hour ago, OVanBruce said:

Who is that? Some Chinese knock off? Have some real japanese Kaga :Smile_trollface:
 

image.thumb.png.bd044d4f65475ac65055b76359d74af5.png

 

You know you cant Win.

I am just much more Fluffy than you.

 

__kaga_kaga_and_kaga_kantai_collection_a

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
196 posts
12,058 battles

So will AA ever be improved as in its current state it is seriously underwhelming?

 

Just been out in a ship that is supposed to be an AA cruiser vs an FDR the most broken of the CVs.

 

Vs a torpedo squadron whilst using priority sector, fully AA speced and using Defensive fire with a boost flag i managed to shoot down a total of 2 aircraft in the entire run which allowed the player to still drop a wall of torpedo's that are so hard to avoid.

 

Yet it appears that on Warships Legends AA actually works so how can two reiterations of the same game have such wildly differing attributes?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,248 posts
17,480 battles
35 minuti fa, CptBarney ha scritto:

Oh lordy lord. Lol, im guessing that has mad AA?

if i have to be honest, when i faced it it had pretty good aa (i was in midway)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TACHA]
Players
679 posts
3,786 battles
39 minutes ago, DocStrangeFruit said:

So will AA ever be improved as in its current state it is seriously underwhelming?

 

Just been out in a ship that is supposed to be an AA cruiser vs an FDR the most broken of the CVs.

 

Vs a torpedo squadron whilst using priority sector, fully AA speced and using Defensive fire with a boost flag i managed to shoot down a total of 2 aircraft in the entire run which allowed the player to still drop a wall of torpedo's that are so hard to avoid.

 

Yet it appears that on Warships Legends AA actually works so how can two reiterations of the same game have such wildly differing attributes?

 

What I want to know is why does World of Warships Legends, (You know, the console version...), have BETTER models for the aircraft than we do?

Spoiler

image.thumb.png.3c12385d0c4db97b757246292d47fb29.png

image.thumb.png.52f89e3ea5ed4ef7102c9c52f4b215ff.png

 

image.thumb.png.584fea4178d1700354f87cf3ebeaa4c7.png

image.thumb.png.6876b5546dfe423bb59c17493cce6043.png

Every other developer on the planet "So we had to tone it down for the console version"

WarGaming "So in Soviet Russia...."

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×