Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Bear__Necessities

Stealth Radar

90 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[AAO]
Players
1,597 posts
21,919 battles

But tovarish!

Yueyang, Chung Mu, Hsienyang and Black can all stealth-radar and are clearly filthy capitalist tubs!

Even imperialist British cruisers can do that, so obviously can be no problem at all with glorious peoples ship production.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
468 posts
15 minutes ago, rnat said:

But tovarish!

Yueyang, Chung Mu, Hsienyang and Black can all stealth-radar and are clearly filthy capitalist tubs!

Even imperialist British cruisers can do that, so obviously can be no problem at all with glorious peoples ship production.

Then why rework the USN radar in the first place???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
1,006 posts
11,990 battles

the fact that the tier 10 that will replace the moskva has the same concealment stock than a full concealment build moskva and get spotted inside the smoke from the same distance of the des moine is so stupid is not even funny

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
266 posts
3,046 battles

This Company is ridiclious, seriously.

 

How can anyone of WG's balancing team (if there is even one, considering those ships get included into the game) be serious with their statements about "yes, those ships are balanced and have their fair share of weaknesses" My *SS do they have their fair share of weaknesses.

 

Holy crap do you have to be blind to reason and selfawareness to seriously think that these ships are good for the game.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AAO]
Players
1,597 posts
21,919 battles
48 minutes ago, dunbine said:

Then why rework the USN radar in the first place??? 

1) You splendidly ignored my sarcasm *slow clap*

2) The radar-rework only reduced the range on the T9-10 USN CL. The T8-9 USN CA and RN CL actually their radars buffed in the process

(e.g. the Edin got it's stealth-radar window buffed form 200m to 1km and Balti gained the 100m stealth-radar window)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
511 posts
8,639 battles
Vor 55 Minuten, dunbine sagte:

Then why rework the USN radar in the first place???

because that was heavy cruiser line. Well, Buffalo with 10,4 CE is very close to stealthradaring, if you are spotted, wait 5 seconds and press radar and you will always radar DD, unless he already was moving away. And volleys from Buffalo hurt more then DM, Alaska, all in all exelent DD hunter. But nobody is saying it's OP.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,010 posts

It's WG, where santity took a back seat to Russian BIAS and regional discrimination, to keep the RU players happy and correct me if I'm wrong RU players make NA players look tactically smart and capable?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SKRUB]
Players
654 posts
29,431 battles

Well stats are not final, CC still didn't land a finger on them, but community is already crazy.

giphy.gif

 

Nice. :cap_popcorn:

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
468 posts
14 minutes ago, rnat said:

1) You splendidly ignored my sarcasm *slow clap*

2) The radar-rework only reduced the range on the T9-10 USN CL. The T8-9 USN CA and RN CL actually their radars buffed in the process

(e.g. the Edin got it's stealth-radar window buffed form 200m to 1km and Balti gained the 100m stealth-radar window)

Sarcasm is often appreciated, did not meant to be rude

But i am quite worried about this changes, cause even if i like this game, and invested so much time on it, i am considering to quit it.

That's no sarcasm, but realty

I am fine with russian ships be balanced with other ships, even if historically they were very bad

I am not fine with them to be better so often, and to see that changes in the game buffs them even more while they should balance them...

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
1,006 posts
11,990 battles
1 minute ago, Lebedjev said:

Well stats are not final, CC still didn't land a finger on them, but community is already crazy.

giphy.gif

 

Nice. :cap_popcorn:

Well, you know, even when the community  get " crazy " who still release bs ships

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AAO]
Players
1,597 posts
21,919 battles
15 minutes ago, dunbine said:

I am not fine with them to be better so often, and to see that changes in the game buffs them even more while they should balance them...

Don't get me wrong, some of those values are pretty ridiculous, mainly the concealment values and AP.

If this doesn't get balances it will be stupid.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SKRUB]
Players
654 posts
29,431 battles

Community get crazy on a lot of stuff...

For me, i can't say yet, if those ship will be bs or not, like we only get current stat and a picture of them.

 

So maybe we should wait a little and don't take out our fork at each announcement...

 

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AAO]
Players
1,597 posts
21,919 battles
5 minutes ago, Lebedjev said:

So maybe we should wait a little and don't take out our fork at each announcement...

You are aware that you might do untold damage to the torches-and-pitchfork-industry ?

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
162 posts
5,824 battles

Well, its typical probably all these cruisers were drawn on napkin and I think those soviet cruisers have best armor penetration on AP and accuracy on range!

 

Most of Soviet era cruisers and battleships should look like this!

 

Soviet cruiser Murmansk (1955)

Murmansk_cruiser_shipwreck.jpg

 

16aac2ab418292b840ac5b85f06fcff5.jpg

  • Cool 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,927 posts
13,486 battles
13 minutes ago, Lebedjev said:

Community get crazy on a lot of stuff...

For me, i can't say yet, if those ship will be bs or not, like we only get current stat and a picture of them.

 

So maybe we should wait a little and don't take out our fork at each announcement...

 

 

The problem is that some of the stats related to these ships are idiotic beyond belief, and the very notion of even suggesting these stats should be ridiculed. A LIGHT cruiser with more health as a equal tier Heavy Cruiser? Having a range beyond some of the battleships it will face regularly?

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MA-GE]
Beta Tester
298 posts
12,787 battles
29 minutes ago, Lebedjev said:

Well stats are not final, CC still didn't land a finger on them, but community is already crazy.

giphy.gif

 

Nice. :cap_popcorn:

Not accurate, Flamu has completely lost his $&%! at the new stats, suggesting towards the end of his vid that WG have been willfully misleading people, there is a word for that but if I use it I'll get another forum warning for being mean to WG.

 

TB.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,505 posts
40,417 battles
2 hours ago, Toss_a_coin_to_your_CV said:

You keep saying Russian Bias isn't a thing..

Well, i opposed the "ru-bias" for the longest time :Smile_sceptic: After spending the last half hour with reading the new post i am speechless.

 

Should i bother to unlock the new TX freemium DDs at all after this announcement? Seems pointless now.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POPPY]
[POPPY]
Players
1,662 posts
20,300 battles
Just now, invicta2012 said:

Well, that is quite a lot of cruisers, isn't it?

More than half the cruisers in the world were built by the Glorious Soviet Union the only reason you don't know about them Komrade is that they were ultra top Sekrit and only posted in Siberia :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×