Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Fonfalks

Wargaming, please just stop

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[QARTV]
Players
535 posts
11,301 battles

Wargaming, we your player base, understand that we are nothing but trash that needs to give you money for ever increasingly broken, stupid, unplayable game, but seriously, you need to stop with your Smolensk and Kremlin overpower crap, because this will end badly for you. 

I understand that you are in process of creating new, even more absurd, idiotic, OP game mechanic and class - submarines, but just maybe, MAYBE you could spend 5 minutes to see obvious and fix those 2 ships, so that they are not AT LEAST that OP? 

Would it be too hard? I understand that community has been asking for this since those 2 hell spawns came out and you have been spitting in our face and doing nothing about it also since then, so here i am asking once more, because why not...

  • Cool 7
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BAD-F]
Beta Tester
780 posts
15,071 battles
7 hours ago, Fonfalks said:

Wargaming

If you wish to inform WG about something please do so.

Writing post on forum leads nowhere.

 

When I think about it, if each player would send a postcard to their office asking to nerf Kremlin, would they even admit that such a thing happened?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
452 posts
19,428 battles
1 minute ago, Sir_Grzegorz said:

If you wish to inform WG about something please do so.

Writing post on forum leads nowhere.

 

When I think about it, if each player would send a postcard to their office asking to nerf Kremlin, would they even admit that such a thing happened?

I don't wana be the plz buf it guy but um.. Unless Kremlin AA mounts where always weak. They get knocked out super easily now. 5 min in a cv match and all where knocked out. 

38ac2fcf-5b40-4b4f-975d-d9e2f409276a.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BAD-F]
Beta Tester
780 posts
15,071 battles
42 minutes ago, Sirius_IV said:

5 min in a cv match

Issue here is that you have to have a CV, and CV must be actively pursuing you.

Until both of this requirements are met Kremlin was not nerfed.

Maybe they have go to hard on the AA HP but it still needs some nerfs.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBF-]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
827 posts
16,623 battles

Weird, Venezia beats Smolensk in average damage and winrate, but no-one complains about that ship :cap_yes:

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLOBS]
Beta Tester
5,311 posts
13,715 battles
12 minutes ago, Lieut_Gruber said:

Weird, Venezia beats Smolensk in average damage and winrate, but no-one complains about that ship :cap_yes:

Perhaps because it does little to saturated Superstructure BBs? and you actualy can shoot back at it. Nobody complain agist Colbert either. Smolensk has just a toxic playstyle with both smoke and that citadel overpen BS.......

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Beta Tester
2,206 posts
21,605 battles
18 minutes ago, Lieut_Gruber said:

Weird, Venezia beats Smolensk in average damage and winrate, but no-one complains about that ship :cap_yes:

That is because Venezia is only able to hit you every 20 seconds but the attention span of the average player is somewhere in between 0.1 to 19.99 seconds. /s :Smile_child:

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
373 posts
6,453 battles
1 minute ago, Spellfire40 said:

Perhaps because it does little to saturated Superstructure BBs? and you actualy can shoot back at it. Nobody complain agist Colbert either. Smolensk has just a toxic playstyle with both smoke and that citadel overpen BS.......

Use HE vs Smolensk = dead Smolensk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
304 posts
7 minutes ago, Rionnen_marksman said:

Use HE vs Smolensk = dead Smolensk.

But...but...but.... using HE in a BB is strictly forbidden i thought.

Only noobs shooting HE in BB .

This is what almighty forumgods say...

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
119 posts
8,935 battles
9 hours ago, Fonfalks said:

Wargaming, we your player base, understand that we are nothing but trash that needs to give you money for ever increasingly broken, stupid, unplayable game, but seriously, you need to stop with your Smolensk and Kremlin overpower crap, because this will end badly for you. 

I understand that you are in process of creating new, even more absurd, idiotic, OP game mechanic and class - submarines, but just maybe, MAYBE you could spend 5 minutes to see obvious and fix those 2 ships, so that they are not AT LEAST that OP? 

Would it be too hard? I understand that community has been asking for this since those 2 hell spawns came out and you have been spitting in our face and doing nothing about it also since then, so here i am asking once more, because why not...

What? Didn't you know, that WW2 era soviet subs already used nuclear propulsion and homing torpedoes, not to mention the stalinium alloy?:Smile_trollface:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PNAVY]
Players
5,270 posts
15,314 battles
Vor 5 Minuten, Hedgehog1963 sagte:

if you think Smolensk is OP, then play Smolensk.

It is op. It's easy to play. Easy to perform well in. Just smoke and click at whatever is in range. It melts everything. With half a brain you can't die in that thing. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONUS]
[BONUS]
Beta Tester
3,171 posts
13,467 battles
1 minute ago, Yoshanai said:

It is op. It's easy to play. Easy to perform well in. Just smoke and click at whatever is in range. It melts everything. With half a brain you can't die in that thing. 

Apparently so.   Makes my point for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KAKE]
Players
2,804 posts
6,795 battles
1 hour ago, Spellfire40 said:

Nobody complain agist Colbert either. 

Probably because it's fairly rare.

 

A reasonably well played Colbert can be far more of a pain in the arse than Smolensk because it's so stupidly agile that it can dodge pretty much anything that's not a Russian railgun.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
644 posts
4,569 battles
9 minutes ago, Uglesett said:

Probably because it's fairly rare.

 

A reasonably well played Colbert can be far more of a pain in the arse than Smolensk because it's so stupidly agile that it can dodge pretty much anything that's not a Russian railgun.

 

Funny enough i'm slowly getting to grips with my Kremlin as I want to be better at BB play and not just play DD all the time. I made the mistake of chasing down a Colbert last night, he was 12k away and I could not hit him for toffee, at least not to do decent damage. He burned me down with relative ease. I won't make that mistake again for sure :)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
[THESO]
Moderator
4,580 posts
15,574 battles
11 hours ago, Fonfalks said:

Wargaming, we your player base, understand that we are nothing but trash that needs to give you money for ever increasingly broken, stupid, unplayable game, but seriously, you need to stop with your Smolensk and Kremlin overpower crap, because this will end badly for you. 

I understand that you are in process of creating new, even more absurd, idiotic, OP game mechanic and class - submarines, but just maybe, MAYBE you could spend 5 minutes to see obvious and fix those 2 ships, so that they are not AT LEAST that OP? 

Would it be too hard? I understand that community has been asking for this since those 2 hell spawns came out and you have been spitting in our face and doing nothing about it also since then, so here i am asking once more, because why not...

Be constructive

  • When posting, please make sure you do so with good intentions. Refrain from posting when you don't have anything positive or constructive to say on the topic.
  • Your post should contribute to the discussion or the solution of the issue being discussed.
  • If the only purpose of your post is to be negative, it is not worth posting.

Topic will be locked!

If you have suggestions about the game, please use the appropriate topic.

 

 

  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×