Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
nq4we

CV Aquila Regia Marina

8 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[DREAD]
Players
9,247 posts
6,465 battles
14 hours ago, nq4we said:

#wewantAQUILAcv

 

Aquila would be great!

 

What planes were planes for the ship?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,459 posts
13,714 battles

Only if it can only launch planes once and then it can't recover them anymore. That's what allied engineers concluded it would have been like after the war, if memory serves..

 

Seriously though, there's already too many CV's in the game, we really don't need another premium member of the fun police.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,263 posts
3,024 battles
22 minuti fa, 1MajorKoenig ha scritto:

 

Aquila would be great!

 

What planes were planes for the ship?

 

 

A carrier based version of the Reggiane Re. 2001 "Falco II" was planned but never completed sure to the ship never being completed either.

Thus is the land based version

Reggiane_Re2001_150sq.jpg

 

There was also a torpedo armed variant of the FIAT G.55 "Centauro" (the G.55S); however it wasn't carrier based

Fiat_G.55_Torpedo.jpg

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
9,247 posts
6,465 battles
6 minutes ago, Captain_Newman said:

Only if it can only launch planes once and then it can't recover them anymore. That's what allied engineers concluded

 

If you go by that logic Russian Battleships would have a 20cm belt at max because that was the maximum the Russian industry could deliver. And half of all ships couldn’t be in the game. Mind you how absurd some fantasy designs are in WOWS (eg Roon).

 

No, it doesn’t matter anymore if they design would have been successful or not. The game is long past that state. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
9,247 posts
6,465 battles
4 minutes ago, wot_2016_gunner said:

A carrier based version of the Reggiane Re. 2001 "Falco II" was planned but never completed sure to the ship never being completed either.

Thus is the land based version

Reggiane_Re2001_150sq.jpg

 

There was also a torpedo armed variant of the FIAT G.55 "Centauro" (the G.55S); however it wasn't carrier based

Fiat_G.55_Torpedo.jpg

 

Italians know how to “design”

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,459 posts
13,714 battles
9 minutes ago, 1MajorKoenig said:

 

If you go by that logic Russian Battleships would have a 20cm belt at max because that was the maximum the Russian industry could deliver. And half of all ships couldn’t be in the game. Mind you how absurd some fantasy designs are in WOWS (eg Roon).

 

No, it doesn’t matter anymore if they design would have been successful or not. The game is long past that state. 

Hence why I indicated it was a joke :Smile_glasses: 
The part of my argument I meant seriously was that there's already too much sky balans in the game. Matches with no stealth are boring, and the more CV types there are, the larger the percentage of CV games you'll get, which a lot of the player base including myself find a lot less interesting. You already have 3 lines and a bunch of premium ones, and the game would have been far better off without them, stop asking for more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×