Stat Padding God Mode..

[GraySlayer]

So I was browsing stats as you do and came across this little gem.

 

WTF!!! Over 6000 battles at T1! I mean what?

 

 

[mtm78]

I seen worse, like 20k battles at tier I. 

 

Also, I don't really think this classifies as stadpadding. I don't think this player is even aware of his/her stats. 

[GraySlayer]

5 minutes ago, mtm78 said:

I seen worse, like 20k battles at tier I. 

 

Also, I don't really think this classifies as stadpadding. I don't think this player is even aware of his/her stats. 

 

No i was joking but how can you even do that? Stick at t1 for that many battles..

[mtm78]

I even heard of someone who didn't understand how the tech tree worked and just kept playing the tier I without ever unlocking something. Idk if that was true btw or just some classical fake tale. 

 

I can imagine people staying in tier 3-6 or something for historical / immersion reasons mainly, but tier 1 doesn't offer anything really so people who keep playing that must have other reasons. 

 

 

[lovelacebeer]

Whom ever can play that many battles at tier 1 clearly doesn't get bored easily - and I play this game to an unhealthy degree.

[Major_Damage225]

Guess this player is happy to put around and pew pew in T1, because stat padding can be understood to a degree but to play that many battles in sutch a tier, im inclined to think that its theyr fun zone there. 

[invicta2012]

Black Swan, eight kills a game.... maybe that makes them happy. Kiting Tier III BBs around islands in Smith and sinking them one torpedo at a time makes me happy....

[Sargento_YO]

I guess it's just someone who enjoys the tier 1 gameplay. No camping, no dds sitting in smoke screen without fear of being retaliated, no torpedoes, just plain old shelling.

[AirSupremacy]

T1 matches can be a refreshing change every now and then.

[SlightlyOff]

I imagine Tier 1 is super bad for stat padding, if only because of the wait times in queue. Outside all but the busiest periods, it just takes ages to even just get a game.

[Padds01]

hmm actually t1 was pretty good...

[Floofz]

My question is how on earth you manage to do 88k damage in a tier 1 game. Is there even that much hp in the game?

[mtm78]

20 minutes ago, Floofz said:

My question is how on earth you manage to do 88k damage in a tier 1 game. Is there even that much hp in the game?

 

No, not in a pure T1 game, not by a long shot ->

 

Black Swan, 6450hp per ship, 12 ships = 77400 in total in enemy team.

 

The only way this would be possible, to get that max dmg, if by taking the ship into a higher tier match.

 

 

 

[invicta2012]

That was probably pre-nerf Black Swan, and someone divisioning up into Tier II or III. She was ludicrously over gunned for Tier I - Six 4 inch guns firing AP shells (not the practice HE she has these days)....

[cracktrackflak]

These games do attract people with various OCD-type disorders, and who will gain satisfaction by playing thousands and thousands of near-identical games.

 

Look at WoT - there are players who have tens of thousands of games in a single tank.

[Fat_Maniac]

19 hours ago, GraySlayer said:

So I was browsing stats as you do and came across this little gem.

 

WTF!!! Over 6000 battles at T1! I mean what?

 

 

Maybe hes a Black Swan fan 

[ARE_YOU_HUMAN]

Imagine having 19 point captain on tier 1. lmao

[Butterdoll]

19 hours ago, mtm78 said:

I even heard of someone who didn't understand how the tech tree worked and just kept playing the tier I without ever unlocking something. Idk if that was true btw or just some classical fake tale. 

 

I can imagine people staying in tier 3-6 or something for historical / immersion reasons mainly, but tier 1 doesn't offer anything really so people who keep playing that must have other reasons. 

 

 

if you are talking about me, yes it's true.

At the beginning, I didn't understand how the port thing/menu worked.

And one day and by mistake I went from Eire to Phoenix without playing the t2 or t3.

That was worse, because with that I was under the impression that only free XP counted to upgrade from ship to ship.

What I found strange is after that I couldn't upgrade any more ships (my free XP was at 0)

But then I found the forum.

 

p.s. I think the first time I played St.Loius was in the Halloween event in 2017 or something, a ship called Igor. 

 

 

[Butterdoll]

1 hour ago, invicta2012 said:

That was probably pre-nerf Black Swan, and someone divisioning up into Tier II or III. She was ludicrously over gunned for Tier I - Six 4 inch guns firing AP shells (not the practice HE she has these days)....

Black swan was nerfed?

[Shaka_D]

It might also be someone of really weak character who's ego is so frail they need to somehow make themselves feel good in some way, even if it is through slaughtering innocents at tier 1. Yes, there really are people like this.

[SeaWolf7]

19 hours ago, mtm78 said:

I even heard of someone who didn't understand how the tech tree worked and just kept playing the tier I without ever unlocking something. Idk if that was true btw or just some classical fake tale. 

 

 

16 minutes ago, Butterdoll said:

if you are talking about me, yes it's true.

 

 

1 hour ago, invicta2012 said:

 She was ludicrously over gunned for Tier I - Six 4 inch guns firing AP shells (not the practice HE she has these days)....

Ahhh the good old days that was a lot of FUN.

 

 

[Butterdoll]

3 minutes ago, SeaWolf7 said:

 

 

Ahhh the good old days that was a lot of FUN.

 

 

yeap, 318 battles on t1.

of those, 155 were made on black swan.

[mtm78]

44 minutes ago, Butterdoll said:

Black swan was nerfed?

 

It used to be stetpedder territory due to having RN AP pen angles I think...

 

Not sure, I only took Umizoomi into higher tier matches for fun

[invicta2012]

55 minutes ago, mtm78 said:

stetpedder

Is that statpadding, but for South Africans?

[mtm78]

4 minutes ago, invicta2012 said:

Is that statpadding, but for South Africans?

Ask Jangles