Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Tempest83

Price drop on Premium Shop

61 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[EST]
[EST]
Players
1,859 posts
35,512 battles
7 minutes ago, L0V3_and_PE4CE said:

Fact is prizes were lowered. That's a good thing. 

Stay away if you can't afford it. 

I can and have. And i will keep away. Yep its better than nothing. Just pointed out that still complaining can be reasonable but not mandatory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,693 posts
4,658 battles
2 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

Around 18% discount...

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

Is this the official position of the price drop in euros on the eu server? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
7,146 posts
31,446 battles

Hi all,

6 minutes ago, black_falcon120 said:

Is this the official position of the price drop in euros on the eu server? 

 

All we have is this...

 

https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/premium-shop-price-decreases/

 

Quote

Premium Shop Price Decreases

 

From September, 9 until the end of Update 0.8.8 we are running experimental price decreases in the Premium Shop. The cheaper bundles just got cheaper!

 

For example, a 30-days Premium time bundle now costs €8.19£7.01 instead of €9.95 / £8.52.

 

This change affects not only Premium time, but also ships. For instance, flag_USA_dd9fc06d19a8638f4077ab2fe200d22premium_dac9e09cf46059e1432206f07fdb2eabVI Monaghan now costs €16.12 / £13.79 instead of €18.51 / £15.84.

 

This decrease applies to all types of items found in the Premium Shop.

 

So... around 18% for "Premium Time" and around 13% for "Premium Ships"...

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts
9 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

Around 18% discount...

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

it is kind of weird tbh ...

out of the blue, without decent explanation, some blanket weird-[edited]discount ...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONUS]
Beta Tester
1,866 posts

Maybe something went wrong or somebody screwed up the prices, and this excuse is just that: an excuse to cover up the mistake :cap_haloween:

 

Spoiler

Yes, the levels of Tinfoil Hat are off the charts here, and you shouldn't take it too seriously :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
3,242 posts
1 minute ago, Bellegar said:

Maybe something went wrong or somebody screwed up the prices, and this excuse is just that: an excuse to cover up the mistake :cap_haloween:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Yes, the levels of Tinfoil Hat are off the charts here, and you shouldn't take it too seriously :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Or the purchases made via the premium shop have dried up recently (due to a lack of sufficient new fodder, and well-saturated veterans who don't need to buy anything anymore?), and this "price-adjusting" is an attempt at rekindling sales?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,590 battles
17 minutes ago, Bellegar said:

Maybe something went wrong or somebody screwed up the prices, and this excuse is just that: an excuse to cover up the mistake

My guess is that WG have the same internal argument that most 'sellers of stuff' have i.e. whether or not higher sales from lower prices generate more/less/same profits as fewer sales at higher prices.

 

This is just a test to prove the point one way or the other (and to shut up the pro low price people in the WG office).

 

There may also be an element of PR here - quite a lot of us always answer 'which premium should I buy' questions on here with a variation on the theme of 'something you'll play a lot because premiums are over-priced'; if too many people believe that things in the shop are too expensive, then WG have a problem.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,242 posts
10,755 battles
8 minutes ago, Verblonde said:

and to shut up the pro low price people in the WG office

Or make them say: "We told you so!" when the sales generate more sales / higher profits.

 

 

Soooo if we want to encourage WG doing more such prices ... big spending should be done now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONUS]
Beta Tester
1,866 posts
14 minutes ago, Allied_Winter said:

Or make them say: "We told you so!" when the sales generate more sales / higher profits.

 

 

Soooo if we want to encourage WG doing more such prices ... big spending should be done now?

The problem is that for this kind of thing, the decrease is not big enough. I mean, a lot of small bits make a large effect for WG, but a few euros discount on a premium ship doesn't make me rethink my "this ship is too expensive for what it is" sentiment.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
211 posts

In the last year they have increased the prices and lowered the prizes. So this is a fake reduction.

 

Also i expect some kind of price drop on their birthday. I`ll wait and see. If they continue with this idiotic politics, ill continue not to buy anything. yey...

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UAC]
Players
662 posts
2,569 battles

After I bought them :cap_haloween:

just kidding, I'm glad to support the game, but seriously WG needs to up their 'game' to higher level imho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,590 battles
45 minutes ago, Allied_Winter said:

Or make them say: "We told you so!" when the sales generate more sales / higher profits.

Aye, but if they're right and the model changes as a result, they'll still shut up.

 

It's the profit bit that matters (goodness knows how WG calculate that though); I was once involved with a very similar test and the lower price produced both greater sales and reduced profit, so from a pure bottom line perspective, the higher price was the better business decision in that case. Equally, the higher price broadcast the message 'we are expensive' as most people had a handle on what the product should cost, based on the market; so from a reputational standpoint, the higher price was damaging - people were less likely to buy other stuff because they assumed all products were similarly expensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
460 posts
6 hours ago, Allied_Winter said:

Interesting, I thought T-61 was always around 19€ ... but if it's indeed a price drop: GJ WG.

On 01/09, when I bought my T-61, it was still 21,29 euro. Now it's 18,75 euro.

 

That's a 2,54 euro drop. Or 12% off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts

WG marketing is experimenting with pricing as I understood it. Different markets get experimented on.. 'differently'. WG EU gets spoiled again, as usual, so let's consider ourselves once again 'privileged'. :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
[THESO]
Players
991 posts
12,433 battles

You Europeans (western ones at least) don't fully understand the price gap between steam and good old wg accounts. Due to steam regional pricing, wg shop is litterally 10 times more expensive for me during steam sale periods. I won't buy anything at all from wg shop except maybe %75 discounted premium time if they keep throwing that at my way.. 

 

Therefore, 3 euros discount over 30 euros doesn't mean anything at all... 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
86 posts

HAHAHA, this fail company to understand the problem is not the prices are the reason of lowering the income they were having, but their inability to fix gameplay problems and make this game enjoyable for people to play ..

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
11 minutes ago, YesAndNoOrYes said:

HAHAHA, this fail company to understand the problem is not the prices are the reason of lowering the income they were having, but their inability to fix gameplay problems and make this game enjoyable for people to play ..

I'd say you can't have infinite growth of naval game, which is niche theme as it is. So I guess its simply saturation - everyone even remotely interested in ship game already heard, played or play WoWs.

 

And capitalism isn't about making money, its about making MORE money:Smile_smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,067 posts
4,880 battles

Price drops to be expected with declining numbers , New players bring in the business unfortunately nobody wants to play a broken game with p2w mechanics that seems to be the opinion of a lot of reviews on steam.

 

Submarines seem a last ditch attempt to salvage the game imho , Ships were well overpriced anyway.

 

They needs Subs and not the kind that dives underwater .

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RNG-]
[-RNG-]
Players
50 posts
17,763 battles
4 hours ago, Bellegar said:

Maybe something went wrong or somebody screwed up the prices, and this excuse is just that: an excuse to cover up the mistake :cap_haloween:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Yes, the levels of Tinfoil Hat are off the charts here, and you shouldn't take it too seriously :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Could it be due to WOWS birthday being around the corner?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[I-J-N]
Players
13,025 posts

I don't know what the game was like in alpha/beta, but I've been playing since open beta and like I said a thousand times before, I don't like the direction the game's taken since then. Introducing subs into random game play would, IMHO, be a huge mistake no matter how they do it. I'd welcome proper size maps for the higher tiers, but not if it that would come with subs, the submersible underwater kind, not the paying kind.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×