Double CV games

[CptBarney]

2 minutes ago, mtm78 said:

 

Yeah... or when WG suddenly tried to shoehorn submarines into the game... 

Ye. And with subs, because of how they interact they will most likely go through the same thing as CV's atm it seems the opposite, weak atm maybe strong very strong later on?

 

I don't mind them in co-op and operations plus events but no to randoms and ranked plus CB's.

[Bear__Necessities]

A gentle reminder. Even 3 CV’s can be clapped back at if you keep cool and play smart.

 

 

[mtm78]

Clubson.... did you take a shower afterwards?

[CptBarney]

15 minutes ago, Bear_Necessities said:

A gentle reminder. Even 3 CV’s can be clapped back at if you keep cool and play smart.

 

 

Just checked the players in the CV's (enemy team)..Langley was the best but the rest....umm...

 

*starts sweating*

[Bear__Necessities]

Just now, CptBarney said:

Just checked the players in the CV's (enemy team)..Langley was the best but the rest....umm...

 

*starts sweating*

And that's part of my point. Most CV players at T4 are still your average potatoes... I don't play T4 CV now I've grinded... and other really good CV players don't really do it... what's the point. We can club higher and get more reward.

 

Here are some more examples of CV's clapped back 

Spoiler

 

[CptBarney]

2 minutes ago, Bear_Necessities said:

And that's part of my point. Most CV players at T4 are still your average potatoes... I don't play T4 CV now I've grinded... and other really good CV players don't really do it... what's the point. We can club higher and get more reward.

 

Here are some more examples of CV's clapped back 

  Hide contents

 

Damm 24 citadels.

 

Did you transform into super bear while playing dat match? lol.

 

Noticed it's the NA server are players better there or worse?

[Yedwy]

1 minute ago, Bear_Necessities said:

We can club higher and get more reward.

This ^^

[Bear__Necessities]

1 minute ago, CptBarney said:

Damm 24 citadels.

 

Did you transform into super bear while playing dat match? lol.

 

Noticed it's the NA server are players better there or worse?

In low tiers about the same, don't play NA that much due to real life stuff so stuck in the T4-5 bracket. High tiers are more aggressive apparently. 

[CptBarney]

2 minutes ago, Bear_Necessities said:

In low tiers about the same, don't play NA that much due to real life stuff so stuck in the T4-5 bracket. High tiers are more aggressive apparently. 

tell teh boss to 'git gud'

 

But anyways, i know russians on world of tanks are pretty aggressive (from low to high tiers) wonder if they are even more mental on this game as well.

[mtm78]

6 minutes ago, CptBarney said:

tell teh boss to 'git gud'

 

But anyways, i know russians on world of tanks are pretty aggressive (from low to high tiers) wonder if they are even more mental on this game as well.

 

I remember the first time we had a RU team in KoTS, didn't they employ the rolling smoke tactic first ( and with great success )?

[CptBarney]

6 minutes ago, mtm78 said:

 

I remember the first time we had a RU team in KoTS, didn't they employ the rolling smoke tactic first ( and with great success )?

Dunno never watched KoTS.

 

Was the chat filled blyat by any chance?

[El2aZeR]

1 hour ago, Bear_Necessities said:

Here are some more examples of CV's clapped back 

 

Man, you can ALMOST tell who of these managed to get a free T4 CV via invite code.

Almost. 

[CptBarney]

8 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Man, you can ALMOST tell who of these managed to get a free T4 CV via invite code.

Almost. 

[BLUB__BLUB]

3 hours ago, Bear_Necessities said:

In low tiers about the same, don't play NA that much due to real life stuff so stuck in the T4-5 bracket. High tiers are more aggressive apparently. 

Man I went through T4 Hosho in 3 games... and I suck... 

[Bear__Necessities]

1 hour ago, BLUB__BLUB said:

Man I went through T4 Hosho in 3 games... and I suck... 

No credits, flags or prem time. Super stripped account just to grind freely on NA, so a bit of a slower pace is nice. Plus I now aim for the minimum games required for each ships tier brackets to see how far up the leader boards I can get. Little ego push and that :P

[Phayk]

19 hours ago, kfa said:

Its your opinion, i have fun, yesterday, in a T10 battle, came top of my team with 4 kills in my Enterprise. 

Yup, you had fun.

 

Sadly the only way a carrier player has fun is by taking it away from the other players.

 

Also, I made no statement about the balance of carriers. I stated that they had an unworkable design.

[22cm]

14 hours ago, Bear_Necessities said:

A gentle reminder. Even 3 CV’s can be clapped back at if you keep cool and play smart.

 

 

Amazing.... This is an example of what? That even in a game with 3 carrier/team, one of the teams will still win?

 

Most of the players in those teams were complete nubs.

[Yedwy]

5 hours ago, Phayk said:

Sadly the only way a carrier player has fun is by taking it away from the other players.

Well in all honesty that is true for any ship not just CVs, and pretty much any PvP game in general...

[CptBarney]

9 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

Well in all honesty that is true for any ship not just CVs, and any pretty much any PvP game in general...

LOL NEVERMIND.

 

Need to get some more sleep me thinks.

 

EDIT: Actually it is kinda, bugged because it points me to your post instead of mine.

 

how odd.

[Bear__Necessities]

6 hours ago, 22cm said:

Amazing.... This is an example of what? That even in a game with 3 carrier/team, one of the teams will still win?

 

Most of the players in those teams were complete nubs.

As usual you go super negative and don’t read the thread any further.

[Capra76]

1 hour ago, Yedwy said:

Well in all honesty that is true for any ship not just CVs, and pretty much any PvP game in general...

Not really, with the surface ships there's give and take, CA wrecks DD and then takes a devastating strike from a BB who then straight lines into torpedoes from the DD, meanwhile CV sits at the back and attacks whatever he likes, spot the difference?

 

Have a look at the survival rates if you doubt me.

[Yedwy]

12 minutes ago, Capra76 said:

Not really, with the surface ships there's give and take, CA wrecks DD and then takes a devastating strike from a BB who then straight lines into torpedoes from the DD, meanwhile CV sits at the back and attacks whatever he likes, spot the difference?

 

Have a look at the survival rates if you doubt me.

Nope, not convinced, dont know about you but I have fun blasting people, not when they blast me, balance is another thing altogether but getting devstriked aint fun no matter how it happens, only dealing them out...

[Capra76]

9 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

Nope, not convinced, dont know about you but I have fun blasting people, not when they blast me, balance is another thing altogether but getting devstriked aint fun no matter how it happens, only dealing them out...

 

It's a trade, we put up with taking damage from surface ships because we have the opportunity to damage them, with CV it's all one way, we take the damage but get nothing back in return.

[FerrowTheFox]

Vor 4 Minuten, Yedwy sagte:

Nope, not convinced, dont know about you but I have fun blasting people, not when they blast me, balance is another thing altogether but getting devstriked aint fun no matter how it happens, only dealing them out... 

Well, at least for me, I've had plenty of fun being sunk at the hands of a good player with whom I duked out 1vs1 fights. I mean one HAS to lose, but it's when both of you are about equally skilled and keep on fighting until one makes a mistake, that's one of the coolest things in game imo. And I've made many of my contact list friends that way, when we both tipped our hats and said "gg, good fight, let's div up sometime!" after the game.

 

It is when one side has absolutely no chance for a fair fight that their fun is taken away. And CVs stick out like a sore thumb in that regard, because of their inherent range, speed and spotting advantages. They are always in control of an engagement and can dictate the terms. Against any other ship, even if you are at a severe disadvantage, you can run or get behind cover and set up an ambush. or reposition to get a good citadel hit, etc.

 

And yes, I will agree suddenly getting blapped by random long range salvos or torpedo dev strikes can be frustrating in that regard as you couldn't put up a good fight, but even then I often think: "Well, shouldn't have broadsided against that BB", "Should've expected torps from there". I simply got outplayed. But having laughable AA is not getting outplayed. Not being able to run or hide is not getting outplayed. It's just frustrating. At least that's my 2ct on that :)

[Yedwy]

2 hours ago, FerrowTheFox said:

Well, at least for me, I've had plenty of fun being sunk at the hands of a good player with whom I duked out 1vs1 fights. I mean one HAS to lose, but it's when both of you are about equally skilled and keep on fighting until one makes a mistake, that's one of the coolest things in game imo. And I've made many of my contact list friends that way, when we both tipped our hats and said "gg, good fight, let's div up sometime!" after the game.

 

2 hours ago, Capra76 said:

 

It's a trade, we put up with taking damage from surface ships because we have the opportunity to damage them, with CV it's all one way, we take the damage but get nothing back in return.

I understand what you say mates and agree OFC but still giving out damage is more fun then getting damaged... ^^