Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
19MhD95

Smolensk Have to force me to Delete the Game

168 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[OHFK]
Beta Tester
637 posts
18,294 battles
On 9/2/2019 at 11:28 PM, Major_Damage225 said:

OK this Smolensk stuff is lol, and has to stop.....oh..no no dont stop it....''lightbulb''..........WG gib Kitakami nao..asap!!! :cap_horn:

Noone is gonna even notice her added ingame with Smolly taking all the attention.......just add Kitty for a 24 hour period is all i ask.

:cap_money::cap_rambo::cap_money:

:Smile_trollface:

Probably the most immature posts ive seen in awhile. I mean most of the posts ive seen you make are not constructive or useful, Just for your post count right?

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[W-L]
Players
1,738 posts
15,513 battles
1 minute ago, WynnZeroOne said:

Good news is, even the worst of players can get one, eventually.

 

Thus, despite being OP in good hands, she'll present as awful overall... because potatoes.

Not purposely being enigmatic, but please define " Potatoes " 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOFTC]
Players
7,658 posts
13,680 battles
10 hours ago, Animalul2012 said:

What annoys me the most is that this ship has a 30mm deck and side plating? why does a light cruiser get the same armor as the supposed brawling cruiser hindenburg or zao and henry?

It should have had 25 mm but thanks to the 30mm you can get overpens and ricochets all day long on this ship or you should have gave it minotaur citadel!

For some nation the armor is not imporant for the definition of CL/CA. Best example Mogami CL and Mogami CA. Only the Main guns changed, because those make the defintion, the armor is the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,274 posts
16,879 battles
On 9/2/2019 at 11:37 PM, 19MhD95 said:


+300K dmg with EZ any kid can doo that, this ship broken, the only choice when this ship in the game is only Delete the game and forget it for ever,  but we all love the game but this Thing is make as hate this game

 

Please show us 10 replays from you scoring 300+K games in this ship, since it so easy and any kidd can do it.

 

My guess is that you cant.

 

One of the replays are from Flamu who is one of the better players on pretty much all servers, how many crap games do you think he had in the Smolensk before he managed to get this one 300K one? How many Flamu lever of players do you think own Smolensk? I see Smolensk being bottom 3 in post battle results every other game.

 

Strong ship? Yes! Broken? Maybe. Your statement above? Hardly!

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,017 battles
4 minutes ago, Miragetank90 said:

Just a reminder that :etc_swear:ing annoying isn't the same as OP. 

 

Most people dont seem to get the difference... they get farmed "fast" by a Smolensk, so they think its OP. I think, Conqueror is equally annoying to play against, maybe more so, because you can hardly punish one if it knows what its doing. Luckily, most dont :cap_tea:

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLITZ]
Players
3,005 posts
14,957 battles
11 hours ago, 19MhD95 said:

+300K dmg with EZ any kid can doo that

Then show us.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,017 battles
9 hours ago, mtm78 said:

PRobably not, to much effort, and if he did he likely only looked at the dmg counter and didn't try to analyze the game itself. 

 

Yep, i think the same thing. people see 300k+ damage games popping up (half or more of them even losses) and people think its OP. We could swap the Smolensk in the first Video with a Stalingrad (or even a BB), and it would have disposed of the enemies even faster, resulting in less damage but in a more comfortable win.

Roon broadside? Easy kill.

Shima not being spotted because your own shima was stupid? Just Radar it!

Lion/Yamato often Broadside, which doesnt mean much if you are a Smolensk (he might even have used AP right there), but something with bigger guns would have citadelled them.

It was such a close game precisely because it took so long to get rid of those BBs.

 

9 hours ago, mtm78 said:

This scares me.

 

Yeah... im not looking forward to the IFHE rework :Smile_sceptic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,017 battles
10 minutes ago, Europizza said:

I didn't think i'd get a second use out of this one but here were are...

 

Game have to force me to delete the Smolensk.. :fish_haloween:

 

tenor.gif?itemid=7676808

 

Smolensk has 30mm plating so GK will Bounce!!

Smolensk has smoke, you cant even shoot it !!!1111

 

Spoiler

:Smile_trollface::Smile_trollface::Smile_trollface:

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ORM]
Players
142 posts
3,886 battles
4 hours ago, piet11111 said:

Seems the smolensk also threatens ships tier 7 and below making it essential to flee the game entirely.

 oh come on, don't you know the OP is forced to play tier X to maintain his credibility as someone who knows when it's time to delete ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KHIF]
Players
3,687 posts
15,377 battles

Smolensk is not more cancer than a 3 Harugumo in div focusing you or a CV that would only have eyes for on you.

 

And with the Smolenks only 1 ship to aim or to dodge not 3. Worcester is the same (without smoke). And wait some weeks and you will see less Smolenks than these days. It's new, it's bright ... after some devast lots of smolenks will stay in port I think ...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles
1 hour ago, WynnZeroOne said:

Good news is, even the worst of players can get one, eventually.

 

Thus, despite being OP in good hands, she'll present as awful overall it will just take a lot longer... because potatoes will take a lot longer to get it

 

I've added something to your post above, I hope you don't mind. WG will wait for quite some time before doing anything, as they said they are aware of the current distribution of players who are playing the ship and don't want to overly nerf a ship which they expect to perform well for the above reason alone. 

 

Now how much you think it's marketing talk to keep an overpowered ship in the game because Russian Bias, or if you accept the argument ( or are somewhere in the middle ) is up to the beholder. 

 

20 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

 

Yep, i think the same thing. people see 300k+ damage games popping up (half or more of them even losses) and people think its OP. We could swap the Smolensk in the first Video with a Stalingrad (or even a BB), and it would have disposed of the enemies even faster, resulting in less damage but in a more comfortable win.

Roon broadside? Easy kill.

Shima not being spotted because your own shima was stupid? Just Radar it!

Lion/Yamato often Broadside, which doesnt mean much if you are a Smolensk (he might even have used AP right there), but something with bigger guns would have citadelled them.

It was such a close game precisely because it took so long to get rid of those BBs.

 

 

Yeah... im not looking forward to the IFHE rework :Smile_sceptic:

 

I was looking at my per ship best dmg and most of them I can remember exactly what happened. Shima with enemy team full of straight line oblivious battleships even when I've already killed their allies just one reload before, cruiser games where the enemy just let me farm them without even trying to disengage or persuade me to stop shooting them with some nice BB ap. 

 

Yes I am aware that certain CC's will have those games much more often then I do, but I blame that more on them judging minimap better as me and being in the right spot more often as I can pull off. The most skill difference in this game is not in shooting, even when there are some special cases here and there, but in tactical awareness. That's also the main thing which attracted me to the game compared to tanks for instance. In all games there is something you can do, even when bottom tier in a +2 MM.

 

And yeah well I used to have a lot more faith in WG for making a fun and engaging game, but that was when they still were pretty sure submarines wouldn't fit in the gameplay :Smile_trollface: 

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DD537]
Players
1,403 posts
20,506 battles
1 hour ago, Europizza said:

I didn't think i'd get a second use out of this one but here were are...

 

Game have to force me to delete the Smolensk.. :fish_haloween:

 

 

 

Mate, you forgot to blacken his name in the pop-up header :Smile_honoring:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,636 posts
9 minutes ago, Episparh said:

Mate, you forgot to blacken his name in the pop-up header :Smile_honoring:

Well he was actually pretty good just unlucky I caught him broadside. TY, fixed it :Smile_honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DD537]
Players
1,403 posts
20,506 battles
Just now, Europizza said:

Well he was actually pretty good just unlucky I caught him broadside.

That's usually how they end... One mistake or sneaky radar == Devastating strike and a fency looking explosion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RDE-]
Players
496 posts
40,858 battles

this must be op too as hes  got alot of damage...  the boats only as good as the ppl using it and even then it depends who they're playing against, just chill :)

Screenshot_429.png

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,140 battles
2 hours ago, Merlin851526 said:

You keep showing this picture as if it's incontrovertible proof that this ship isn't OP. All it is is proof of the exception rather than the norm.

Read the text I quoted in my above post.

Hint: I highlighted the interesting part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
474 posts
8,076 battles
13 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Read the text I quoted in my above post.

Hint: I highlighted the interesting part.

Must be a language thing. It's the second time you posted that picture here and in the Smolinsk thread and both instances you intimate or downplay the current impact the smolinsk has. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,140 battles
2 minutes ago, Merlin851526 said:

Must be a language thing. It's the second time you posted that picture here and in the Smolinsk thread and both instances you intimate or downplay the current impact the smolinsk has. 

Just read it.... :fish_palm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
474 posts
8,076 battles
1 minute ago, ColonelPete said:

Just read it.... :fish_palm:

Yeah! advice you could well follow yourself. Right one more time. The op is quitting because he feels the smolinsk is overpowered. You post the picture here showing the smolinsk bottom of the opposing team therefore intimating that it isn't overpowered. You make the very same point in a different thread. What am I missing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XBIER]
Players
113 posts
20,990 battles
12 hours ago, GarrusBrutus said:

But... The spreadsheet... 

 

A spreadsheet is nice but this ship is recent brought into the game so the numbers can only go up from the Smolensk when players have more skills on their captains and when they playing more games with this ship. When ships are able to start between 30 and 40 fires in a game than there is something wrong with a ship IMO.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×