Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Update 0.8.7: French Destroyers – Part 2

96 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[DD537]
Players
1,403 posts
20,506 battles
22 minutes ago, wot_2016_gunner said:

I only have one question, will the Reworked consumables come with this update?

@The_EURL_Guy can clarify that. unknown.thumb.png.fabf35f3da86e5d39f907ad1746dea66.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FUFR]
Players
200 posts

 

WG dont give a [edited] about what the players say and have been diskussed in the dedicated thread.

 

Link to dedicated thread:

 

 

[edited] WG for being so ignorant   :cap_viking:   :cap_viking:   :cap_viking:

 

 

 

 

Edited due to rule violation. Please follow the forum rules.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DD537]
Players
1,403 posts
20,506 battles
2 hours ago, gnist0s said:

 

WG dont give a [edited] about what the players say and have been diskussed in the dedicated thread.

 

 

[edited] You WG for being so ignorant   :cap_viking:   :cap_viking:   :cap_viking:

You should be happy that they removed ship buffs. 

 

Now RB is optional, not mandatory. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[INTRO]
[INTRO]
Players
1,518 posts
28,855 battles
2 minutes ago, Last_Rites said:

Where is Friesland?

This might be a hint....

1644882743_2019-08-19(5).thumb.png.7150d0c7d1fa988f935a8c5c9a68df15.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
209 posts
8,622 battles
2 minutes ago, Hanse77SWE said:

This might be a hint....

1644882743_2019-08-19(5).thumb.png.7150d0c7d1fa988f935a8c5c9a68df15.png

Not a confirmation though is it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,046 posts
28 minutes ago, Episparh said:

@The_EURL_Guy can clarify that. 

Spoiler

unknown.thumb.png.fabf35f3da86e5d39f907ad1746dea66.png

 

 

I still don't understand how everyone having the same consumables is somehow balancing the initial NTC concept. There never was any logic behind that argument.

And now they use that illogical argument again to remove a feature many of us actually wanted to see?

@Episparh Do you have a link to that post?

 

@Crysantos @MrConway @Tanatoy

I know you are at Gamescom currently but once you come back, this really needs an explanation. Your company currently seems so far detached from the community that keeps it alive I'd call it a joke if it were not so sad.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[INTRO]
[INTRO]
Players
1,518 posts
28,855 battles
2 minutes ago, Last_Rites said:

Not a confirmation though is it.

No, but it's the best WG can do right now it seems. Keep your pants on.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
209 posts
8,622 battles
1 minute ago, Hanse77SWE said:

No, but it's the best WG can do right now it seems. Keep your pants on.

It was tested alongside the much needed T10 version of a flint and the now overpriced somers, don't see why it should not be released with this patch. Ergo the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TALOS]
Players
316 posts
8,272 battles

As we say in Greece....

 

Στου κουφου την πορτα οσο θελεις βροντα…   On deaf man's door knock knock for as long as you can!!!! (he will not listen)

 

Have fun with this "new feature"....

Ohio here I come...   :Smile-_tongue::Smile-_tongue::Smile-_tongue:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1_MAN]
Beta Tester
78 posts

Can someone explain to me the new chat update, will i be able now to switch off the chat [what people are writing], but see the ping commands ? As now when i switch off the chat, it doesnt show anything. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOTEL]
Players
1 post
3,861 battles

So you are nerfing DFAA to a point it makes your AA worse. What are you doing anymore WG? If you can't balance CV, you should consider removing them from a game. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DD537]
Players
1,403 posts
20,506 battles
35 minutes ago, Egoleter said:

@Episparh Do you have a link to that post?

No, I got this screenshot from KoTS discord. That's why I said that @The_EURL_Guy can clarify it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, Administrator
5,290 posts
4,478 battles
1 hour ago, Egoleter said:

 

I still don't understand how everyone having the same consumables is somehow balancing the initial NTC concept. There never was any logic behind that argument.

And now they use that illogical argument again to remove a feature many of us actually wanted to see?

@Episparh Do you have a link to that post?

 

@Crysantos @MrConway @Tanatoy

I know you are at Gamescom currently but once you come back, this really needs an explanation. Your company currently seems so far detached from the community that keeps it alive I'd call it a joke if it were not so sad.

Hi,

 

The answer by EarlGrey is simply put and probably explain better why we don't have the free consumables with the Research Bureau.

 

As the Colbert so far won't be as much as a game changer than the NTC buffs on the ships could have been, we prefer to not put this feature in, and rather focus on  providing several missions to help with the grind in XP and credits.

 

Remember that Colbert is the perfect definition of a "glass-canon". It can be a really good ship in the hands of an experienced captain (the kind of captain for with the Research Bureau is made), but she almost have no armor. Still, it's a really fun ship to play with, but you can't make more than 2 mistakes in a single game with her ^^ 

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,046 posts
43 minutes ago, Tanatoy said:

Hi,

 

The answer by EarlGrey is simply put and probably explain better why we don't have the free consumables with the Research Bureau.

 

As the Colbert so far won't be as much as a game changer than the NTC buffs on the ships could have been, we prefer to not put this feature in, and rather focus on the providing several missions to help with the grind in XP and credits.

 

Remember that Colbert is the perfect definition of a "glass-canon". It can be a really good ship in the hands of an experienced captain (the kind of captain for with the Research Bureau is made), but she almost have no armor. Still, it's a really fun ship to play with, but you can't make more than 2 mistakes in a single game with her ^^ 

 

I need a confused smiley. Because that's how I feel right now. It still doesn't make any sense.

 

They never were a balancing factor to the NTC buffs. If everyone had them then the buffed ships would have them too. Still a clear advantage for the buffed ship.

1 + 1 = 2

As simple as this math equation was the balance equation. While everyone was a 1 if everyone had the same consumables, the ones with the buffs (another 1) would have been a 2.

You could argue that those without the premium consumables are zeros. That's why we welcomed the change to everyone having the same consumable. It would have actually created balance. 1 = 1

And now you torped it all again.

 

Even if I look at the argument of the economic burden that you made in the first concept post about it, which didn't change at all, it makes no sense. The economic burden for the players using the RB is still there. As large as ever.

 

So I'm sorry to tell you that I'm still missing any logic from your reply. The Colbert wasn't even a topic I asked about.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG]
WG Staff, Administrator
5,290 posts
4,478 battles

I'll note the confused smiley suggestion for the next feature of the forum ^^.

 

The Colbert is, I believe, necessary in the answer, has it's the '"now",  the buff ships were the "past". 

 

Has the free consumables were meant to lower the gap between new and veterans players in the context of the NTC system with direct combat buff. As the system has been completely redesigned, this change was put on hold, as it doesn't fit the concept, as this gap, that could have been created by those combat buff won't be here.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[P7S]
Players
452 posts
56 minutes ago, Blinztrin said:

So you are nerfing DFAA to a point it makes your AA worse. What are you doing anymore WG? If you can't balance CV, you should consider removing them from a game. 

 

 

Nerfing? Has anything changed vs. the test server? Because there AA was ridicolously powerful. To the point that you will likely stop seing CVs in game now at all...

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JR-IT]
[JR-IT]
Players
255 posts
21,696 battles

Please Stop releasing early acces  ships "by chance" That is totally unfair! I am doing stuff for 4 (anykind what can drop a ship) even container, maybe reciving none, maybe all... How would you explain this fairness if someone gets 4 tech tree ships (counting all the credits, XP, commander retraining xp, time spent), and someone none, doing exactly the same mission?

Also doing this Research Bureau  thingy's main goal to introduce players to the lower tiers, what was removed by the early access mid-high tier ships...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×