Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Nocturnal_Scream

WG Statement pls | Changes to Adrenalin Rush and Torpedo Bomber heal

57 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles

@MrConway A few Weeks back, when the AA was changed in the state it is right now, I mentioned that Adrenalin Rush in its current state and the Torpedo Bomber heal (especially AR though) are in very rough, if not UNPLAYABLE spot right now for CVs. You acknowledged that and told me, that WG is aware of this issue. Nothing has been done so far and with the PTS notes for 0.8.7 out, I'm wondering whether you forgot about these two skills. Link to your statement is right here: 
quote:
"We know that these two skills might need to be changed, we're watching data and will update you on upcoming changes when decisions have been made."
https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/120142-cvs-unplayable-demand-refund/?do=findComment&comment=3057994

 

So can someone from @WG tell us whether there are future plans to change these skills or whether wargaming just tried to calm down people with not following up afterwards. I look forward to the AA  changes in 0.8.7, but to little has been done to slow, and thats not only my oppionion, thats the oppinion of many players. This includes all Top Tier CV players as well, which all has stopped playing CVs as it is right now, since the balance changes seem to be still in alpha. This frustrates me as i bought the premium CVs as well and the current state of AA made the Saipan in an uptier match the most fruistrating single ship in the entire game to play :) but thats a tale for another story. BOTTOM LINE:

Is there anything going to happen towards Adrenaline Rush and the Torpedo Heal, or has this been forgotten.

PS: thx for the support so far, make sure this thread gets some attention so it stays on top and WG reacts to it :)

regards
Noc

  • Cool 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles

I would like a statement though, because just calming down people without actually following up is...well... I save my words, but the people now what I'm about to say

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles

well, wg knows about it but ye... its just like they told us when they realeased the premium cvs and told us that no more major balance changes are coming :D

 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles
1 minute ago, peoplescavalry said:

I have every premium CV but only the Enterprise gets a look in these days.

ye pretty much only the enterprise performance good in uptiered matches right now. Even kaga will have some issues with planes because they are absolute paper in t10. But saipan certainly suffered the most with basicly no reservers and 2 minute + regen time. And I played all premium CVs extensively up to the highest skill level. Also Zeppelin AP Bombers are still utterly useless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MA-GE]
Beta Tester
298 posts
12,792 battles

How long have you been playing this game?

 

It will take the devs and subsequently CM's to do/say anything about this, as usual knee jerk "balanzing" decisions with no fore thought for knock on effects is the WG way. They're playing a sort of "whack a mole" with problems, hit the one the community screams about the most whilst causing several more problems down the line.

 

TB.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DIOR]
Players
651 posts
63 battles
Vor 1 Minute, peoplescavalry sagte:

I have every premium CV but only the Enterprise gets a look in these days.

8.7 will be the tombstone for cv gameplay. There will be no need for changes as Noone will play this crap. Aa goes from godmode into titan mode if used correctly. That's [edited]. Aa was to strong in 8.6 already and it was no fun game experience but on top of that they allow folks to do 10k burst dmg (undogeable) and make any cv player cry. Just dodge I guess. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles
2 minutes ago, T3ddyBear said:

How long have you been playing this game?

 

It will take the devs and subsequently CM's to do/say anything about this, as usual knee jerk "balanzing" decisions with no fore thought for knock on effects is the WG way. They're playing a sort of "whack a mole" with problems, hit the one the community screams about the most whilst causing several more problems down the line.

 

TB.

Yup, and the CV rework is the prime example of WG doing just that. Basicly let us alpha test the balance changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CAIN]
Players
5,207 posts
25,733 battles

CVs don't need AR at all, it was stupid to give them that skill in the first place.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles
1 minute ago, Jethro_Grey said:

CVs don't need AR at all, it was stupid to give them that skill in the first place.

You can argue about that for sure, I dont want to start a rant here whether cvs are balanced or not, this is not that point of this thread. The fact is, that this skill is broken right now for cvs, and the torpedo bomber heal is about the same. I want to know what WG plans for those two skills. Removing is certainly one option but that is WG to decide. I just want to be sure that his is not forgotten by WG

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DIOR]
Players
651 posts
63 battles
Vor 9 Minuten, Nocturnal_Scream sagte:

You can argue about that for sure, I dont want to start a rant here whether cvs are balanced or not, this is not that point of this thread. The fact is, that this skill is broken right now for cvs, and the torpedo bomber heal is about the same. I want to know what WG plans for those two skills. Removing is certainly one option but that is WG to decide. I just want to be sure that his is not forgotten by WG

It won't be forgotten. But I think someone stated in the forums I think it was a mod... That the heal is fine..... He said it still works to heal flak burst and to heal against fighter planes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,187 battles
48 minutes ago, Jethro_Grey said:

CVs don't need AR at all, it was stupid to give them that skill in the first place.

No it wasn't stupid and it wasn't a significant speed buff. It was useful to run away from heavy AA. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
3 hours ago, Nocturnal_Scream said:

I would like a statement though, because just calming down people without actually following up is...well... I save my words, but the people now what I'm about to say

You mean standard Wargaming PR work?:cap_tea:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,844 posts
14,993 battles
6 hours ago, Nocturnal_Scream said:

WG Statement pls | Changes to Adrenalin Rush and Torpedo Bomber heal

Nerfs will continue until CV player moral increases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
1 hour ago, Nocturnal_Scream said:

thats a straightdown buff to the cvs, not just "intersting"

Buff in terms on relative nerf to Sector, not so much when it comes to stacking auras (again)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
86 posts
3,641 battles

the most important thing they are changing is that the planes which succesfully attack will return alive and not die like flies :) but who Am i to know what those changes do to cvs, im just a pleb lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles

Official stance as answered by S_O on reddit is that both are fine and you should just deal with it. Since S_O is an actual developer his word kinda trumps Conway's.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HU-SD]
Players
2,655 posts
14,214 battles
15 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

Official stance as answered by S_O on reddit is that both are fine and you should just deal with it. Since S_O is an actual developer his word kinda trumps Conway's.

I'm missing multiple "/s" 's in that statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×