Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Milan_G_

freeXP ships -- some news?

111 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[O-S-W]
Players
609 posts
18,605 battles

some new ships  rumours? :) 

 

alaska is not good for me, for that gigantic 1 mil freeXP. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LADA]
Players
493 posts
7,728 battles

Friesland definitely confirmed from WG as FXP - so if you're after that then start saving. I couldn't imagine it being more than 1 mil FXP - hopefully less because it's a DD?

 

Siegfried is in a similar vein to the Azuma, Alaska, Krondstadt - so it's *possible* that it'll be available for the same currency at around the 1 mil FXP mark. No confirmation on that front at all - it might be a coal ship like the Jean Bart. I personally hope it isn't because it's not like we don't have enough things to sink Coal into as it is. 

 

Those are the only candidates I can think of in the pipeline. The others are either for Steel (Somers) or Coal (Smolensk). I'd really like some mid-tier stuff for FXP like the Nelson - much more accessible and in many ways nicer MM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
5,526 posts
22,760 battles

Following logic Freisland should be 500-750k we shall see though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
858 posts
11,959 battles

I'm hoarding everything until there is some indication of Thunderer's currency/cost.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,773 posts
8,662 battles
11 minutes ago, MacArthur92 said:

Alaska is ok though her HE is... Trollish. 

 

Usually you can use AP tho. Had one game so far where i got completely locked out of using AP... that sucks, but always remember, Alaska has improved AP angles :Smile_medal:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
7,206 posts
33,727 battles
10 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

 

Usually you can use AP tho. Had one game so far where i got completely locked out of using AP... that sucks, but always remember, Alaska has improved AP angles :Smile_medal:

Yep. But against DD sometimes you get 3 pens for 1710 dmg.... Gosh. Her AP is amazing, once I shot a Roon from 18km and got triple citadel with few pens 35k dmg.... :Smile_ohmy:

That's why I said it's ok .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
952 posts
15,159 battles

Siegfried is most likely going to be, since her counterparts Kronshtad, Alaska and Azuma were all free exp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NED]
Players
2,015 posts
7,718 battles

I would expect the Siegfried to show up during gamescom they always like to release something german then.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,433 posts
17,640 battles
28 minutes ago, DanSilverwing said:

I'm hoarding everything until there is some indication of Thunderer's currency/cost.

This

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
5,526 posts
22,760 battles
2 hours ago, DanSilverwing said:

I'm hoarding everything until there is some indication of Thunderer's currency/cost.

Wait, why not simply use 457 on conq?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BABBY]
Beta Tester
1,591 posts

I'd like some more cheaper lower tier FXP ships like Nelson.

Tone has been languishing in the game files for 3-4 years now.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
7,206 posts
33,727 battles
21 minutes ago, StringWitch said:

I'd like some more cheaper lower tier FXP ships like Nelson.

Tone has been languishing in the game files for 3-4 years now.

I agree. Yahagi maybe? That would be a cheap nice T5. Like 180k free exp

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BABBY]
Beta Tester
1,591 posts
1 minute ago, MacArthur92 said:

I agree. Yahagi maybe? That would be a cheap nice T5. Like 180k free exp

 

That would be wonderful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
7,206 posts
33,727 battles
5 minutes ago, Karasu_Hidesuke said:

What I'd like to see is something on tier 9, like a DD, preferably Japanese. :Smile_smile:

T10 Hayate? Idk, they're going to introduce Friesland....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-S-W]
Players
609 posts
18,605 battles

ok friesland

 

and we know cca

 

how many credits will earn each battle.?  ( like how much more like standart premium ships, or...?..)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-S-W]
Players
609 posts
18,605 battles

and.. may be is alaska much better

 

because  dd without torps... like another khabarovsk, but totaly torp less:)))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,430 posts
245 battles

I wouldn't mind seeing more tier 6 or lower premiums, kinda bored of higher tier gameplay and i find lower tiers much more fun too be honest (and no it's not always easier either i usually play tier 5-9).

 

Maybe more free exp ships as well (would actually get me to save free exp half the time) but below tier 7 or at tier7 plus maybe more tier 7 premiums.

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NED]
Players
2,015 posts
7,718 battles

i too would like some lower tier free-xp/coal ships especially if they play a bit different from the regular tech tree ships like how the Scharnhorst is a different playstyle compared to the Gneisenau.

@Crysantos @MrConway  What is your opinion on this ?

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BOBS2]
[BOBS2]
Players
529 posts
16,241 battles
3 hours ago, Yedwy said:

Wait, why not simply use 457 on conq?

 

Personally I'm one of the "nobody" that does, but Thunderer has some changes and improvements:

  • Weak short-range AA, rather than zero.
  • Faster turret traverse.
  • Rudder shift speed equal to Conqueror with legendary module, without needing to give up the concealment module for that.
  • Normal fuse AP, rather than short.
  • Warspite/Hood dispersion formula.
  • Defensive AA Consumable.

So at the moment part of me is wanting them to release Thunderer "now, now, now!" so I can see how much difference the differences actually make and it's one less thing to wonder about. Conversely part of me is hoping the testers and supertesters and CCs stay stubborn about "nobody uses those guns" and Wargaming appease them with more buffs. Though given they nerfed Siegfried when people were recommending buffs the stubbornness could backfire.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MORIA]
Players
7,206 posts
33,727 battles
14 hours ago, Milan_G_ said:

ok friesland

 

and we know cca

 

how many credits will earn each battle.?  ( like how much more like standart premium ships, or...?..)

Will earn as much as every T9 premium. If you got any. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG-EU]
WG Staff
3,282 posts
13,808 battles
13 hours ago, piet11111 said:

i too would like some lower tier free-xp/coal ships especially if they play a bit different from the regular tech tree ships like how the Scharnhorst is a different playstyle compared to the Gneisenau.

@Crysantos @MrConway  What is your opinion on this ?

 

 

Thanks for the feedback, mate. We'll pass it along but the next freeXP ship planned is the Friesland, which is on Tier IX at the current stage - which has been a request for a long time on community channels to get a freeXP DD.

 

Greetings, Crysantos

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×