Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Henning_15

Norway WW2 Cruiser Norge (May not work )

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[VION]
Players
30 posts
2,167 battles

HNoMS Norge was a coastal defence ship of the Eidsvold-class in the Royal Norwegian Navy. Built by Armstrong Whitworth at Newcastle on Tyne, she was torpedoed and sunk by German destroyers in Narvik harbour on 9 April 1940.

 

PEREKET.thumb.png.ae5c8f993fdd87eaa448bc706860d035.png

 

She was Built as part of the general rearmament in the time leading up to the events in 1905, Norge remained, along with her sister-ship Eidsvold, the backbone of the Royal Norwegian Navy for just over 40 years. Norge and Eidsvold were the largest vessels in the Royal Norwegian Navy, displacing 4,233 tons and crewed by 270 men. Both vessels were considered to be quite powerful for their time, with two 21 cm (8.26 inch) guns as their main armament. They were armoured to withstand battle with ships of a similar size, with 6 inches (15.24 cm) of Krupp cementedarmour in the belt and 9 inches (22.86 cm) of the same armour on the two gun turrets.

 

Tier III Premium Cruiser Norge

__________________________________________

SURVIVABILITY

 

Hitpoints: 19 050

 

__________________________________________

ARTILLERY

 

6 × 1  15 cm (5.90 inch) guns None Historical

2 x 1  15 cm  (5.90 inch) guns None Historical

 

 2 × 1  21 cm (8.26 inch) guns Historical

 

Reload TIme: 8.5 s

 

180 Turn Time: 18.0 s

 

Maximum Dispersion: 108

 

Maximum HE Shell Damage: 1300

 

Chance Of HE Shells Causing A Fire On Target: 5.0 %

 

HE Shell Armor Penetration Capacity: 18 mm

 

Maximum AP Shell Damage: 2400

 

Main Battery Firing Range: 10.5

 

SECONDARY ARMAMENT

 

6 × 1  15 cm (5.90 inch) guns Historical

6 × 1  7.6 cm (3 inch) guns Historical

 

Reload Time: 3.0 s

 

Firing Range: 5.0 km

 

Maximum HE Shell Damage: 1100

 

Chance Of HE Shells Causing A Fire On Target: 4.0 %

 

HE Shell Armor Penetration Capacity: 14 mm

 

___________________________________________

AA DEFENCE

 

2 × 76 mm anti-aircraft guns

 

2 × 20 mm Oerlikon guns

 

2 × 12.7 mm Colt anti-aircraft machine guns

 

4 × 7.92 mm Colt anti-aircraft machine guns

 

Mid range AA guns

 

AA Reinforcement: 25 %

 

Sector Reinforcement time: 10 s

 

Sector Reinforcement shift time: 10 s

____________________________________________

MANEUVERABILITY

 

Maximum Speed: 17.2 knots

 

Turning Circle Radius: 500 m

 

Rudder Shift Time: 8.1

____________________________________________

CONCEALMENT

 

Detectability Range By Sea: 10.2 km

 

Detectability Range By Air: 4.3 km 

 

Assured Detectability Range: 2.0 km

 

Detectability After Firing Main Guns in Smoke: 4.6 km

____________________________________________

ARMOR LAYOUT

 

Deck: 50 mm

 

Armor Belt: 152mm

 

Conning Tower: 229 mm

 

____________________________________________

 

 

 

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,684 posts
8,738 battles

No one cares about these inferior river navies and no need to spam forums with a million useless threads about it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
9,704 posts
6,864 battles

 

Hmm, did you change the armament in the description? I see 10 x 15cm now instead of 2 x 21cm? Is that historical?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VION]
Players
30 posts
2,167 battles
7 hours ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said:

No one cares about these inferior river navies and no need to spam forums with a million useless threads about it

Why so angry? its just a exemple dude I dont care if they never get added I only show this if this could work in the game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,048 posts
245 battles

I like the design, Heaviliy armoured but slow, with badish AA, also interesting turret layout.

 

I hope wargaming does consider these.

 

@Crysantos Sorry if your busy, i just want to know if any of Henning_15's ships would be viable? and potential candidates for the pan euro tech tree?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
7,597 posts
13,811 battles
4 hours ago, CptBarney said:

I like the design, Heaviliy armoured but slow, with badish AA, also interesting turret layout.

 

I hope wargaming does consider these.

 

@Crysantos Sorry if your busy, i just want to know if any of Henning_15's ships would be viable? and potential candidates for the pan euro tech tree?

 

If they are, they'll be tier 2-3 material.

So basicly not worth it for T-10WG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,048 posts
245 battles
9 hours ago, Zemeritt said:

 

If they are, they'll be tier 2-3 material.

So basicly not worth it for T-10WG

Yeah, i meant that intentionaly anyways, if i saw those at tier 10 i would laugh.

 

*slides next to zemeritt* i mean...you wouldn't mind having a go at 'balans' with these at tier 10 would you? :Smile_trollface:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×