Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Mydgard

Ranked stars - My idea

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[T-F-K]
Players
233 posts
14,943 battles

Well I think it should be a balance and motivation in winner and loser team too.

 

Winner team:

- Worst XP earner lose 1 star

Loser team:

- Best XP earner win 1 star

- 2nd XP earner don't lose 1 star 

 

 

  • Bad 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KLUNJ]
Players
2,866 posts
7 minutes ago, Mydgard said:

Well I think it should be a balance and motivation in winner and loser team too.

 

Winner team:

- Worst XP earner lose 1 star

Loser team:

- Best XP earner win 1 star

- 2nd XP earner don't lose 1 star 

 

 

Mental...so you make it possible to get to Rank 1 without winning a battle??? :Smile_facepalm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2PTS]
Players
372 posts
53,692 battles

no i like the current system is fun can make a priest toxic ahhahahhaha

image.thumb.png.4222b52c550da5d87663ebc91a0d48a6.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[S_W]
Players
396 posts
30,365 battles

Winner Team: Last place dont get a star

Losing Team: 1st and 2nd place dont lose a star

 

The balance of stars will be the same like now.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RDE-]
Players
448 posts
35,766 battles

not sure about the stars, but we should have another irrevocable at lvl5..

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-F-K]
Players
233 posts
14,943 battles
10 minutes ago, N00Boo7 said:

Winner Team: Last place dont get a star

Losing Team: 1st and 2nd place dont lose a star

 

The balance of stars will be the same like now.

It's also good. 

 

Well I should be R1 long ago if loser 2nd should keep his star. I was 2nd at least 60x in loser team. So I do my best, but many times not I am the best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-AP-]
Players
3,438 posts
9,416 battles

No, it will only make damage farming even more lucrative than it already is. Even less people will actually be trying to win with such a system.

 

My idea would be to keep the current system, but base the "save a star" on an obligatory vote at the end of a battle.

 

Example: My team loses a battle, when they get back to port, they get a popup with all 7 players in their team, they have to click on one of them(not themselves) before being able to enter a new ranked battle. The player with the most votes will save a star. Hopefully the 20km+ camping conqueror wont get any votes, people should instead vote for helpful people who played the objective.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,687 posts
14,854 battles
37 minutes ago, Mydgard said:

Well I think it should be a balance and motivation in winner and loser team too.

 

Winner team:

- Worst XP earner lose 1 star

Loser team:

- Best XP earner win 1 star

- 2nd XP earner don't lose 1 star 

 

 

We have this thread every ranked. It’s called stupid every time. Because it is. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-F-K]
Players
233 posts
14,943 battles
8 minutes ago, Bear_Necessities said:

We have this thread every ranked. It’s called stupid every time. Because it is. 

I think need more generosity and balance for players in loser team who try to do everything for victory. I mean first two XP earners let safe their stars somehow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-F-K]
Players
233 posts
14,943 battles
41 minutes ago, bushwacker001 said:

Mental...so you make it possible to get to Rank 1 without winning a battle??? :Smile_facepalm:

Mental... Many times lose top XP earner do more serious performance like half of winner team.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KLUNJ]
Players
2,866 posts
3 minutes ago, Mydgard said:

Mental... Many times lose top XP earner do more serious performance like half of winner team.

But you still lost....why should you get a winners star?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-F-K]
Players
233 posts
14,943 battles
11 minutes ago, bushwacker001 said:

But you still lost....why should you get a winners star?

I have 53.5% WR with T10s after ~1400 random battles and yes now in this ranked season I don't reach 50%... Why my performance much worse in ranked?! Good question. I was 2nd XP at least 60x in loser team, I am at R4 with ~430 games. In previous season I reached R1 with 139 battles and 60% WR. Yes I became frustrated. Idk why so low my WR, but in most battles I really try to do everything for victory, but it's very not enough.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×