Jump to content
Flandre Bug Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 1 battles to post in this section.
The_EURL_Guy

Dry Dock: Kremlin

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
3,242 posts

What more does this bring than "letting your game idle for 5 minutes in portview", without frying your CPU? 

 

It would be more interesting if you'd show how you come up with your contraptions when there are no specific plans for said ships or only rough guidelines and spec-sheets, and show it how you did it (per ship). That would bring some actual info. We all know your modelling team delivers top-notch work, but this series gives nothing of added value.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
11 posts

''We recreate these ships accurately, according to their blueprints". This is beyond delusional, if you would just say, "Hey, we made some fake cr*p to please our overwhelming main Russian playerbase no one would give about it, but don't tell straight up lies and try to make people believe in this fantasy of a mass murdering dictator. It wasn't possible for the Soviets to ever build these and almost all their designs are incomplete and stolen ideas from other nations and adapted over the years... bragging about the non existing Russian navy from the 1920's to early 1970's and claiming it to be the best designs and ships the world has ever seen and better designed than any other country, even though the ships of those other countries were actually realistically designed, build, perfected, battle proven and actually had the experience  to do this... Using the word historically correct doesn't fit with the USSR Navy...

  • Cool 9
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,449 posts
17,237 battles

Fantastic craftsmanship from the modelling team - who always do a great job! :Smile_honoring:

Why, the ship looks exatly like it did in real life! .....err......wait......what do you mean : "Only Blueprints"?

 

Way too many paper ships in this game for my taste. YMMV of course.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,456 posts
9,251 battles

Video imo serves too little purpose. Other videos at least have something "educational". This is just "Look at this great model." I can do that in port too.

 

Also, I'm not sure how to feel about recreating ships accurately when Roon is a WG-design and has absolute nonsensical 15 cm secondaries that neither make sense ingame nor would they have IRL.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BOBS2]
[BOBS2]
Players
529 posts
2 hours ago, NoobySkooby said:

That CV in the vid was that an upcoming Russian one or a useless Brit one

 

DeHavilland Sea Hornets and roundels on those and the single-engine planes (that look like Fairey Spearfish), so Royal Navy.

 

A bit disappointed that when I checked the single-engine planes did look like Fairey Spearfish rather than Blackburn Firebrands since adding the latter (which she did carry) to the Indomitable would have been an interesting change; it would have made her a combination of the Graf Zeppelin with fast attack-planes and level-bombers and the Saipan with Tier 10 planes, probably in smaller groups than on Audacious, for torpedo-bombers.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
119 posts
4,381 battles

This hilarious and sad at the same time. Indeed the only positive thing that can be said about this is that the modelling team does do great work. Everything else is a steaming pile of (.) :cap_old:

I dare say that no proper naval enthusiast (not even a Russian) would want to see fantasy ships before actual historical ones.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,532 posts

Seriously why all the fuss over paper ships, all the more to have fun in, were the Conqueror, Montana, GK and now the Georgia, not paper ships, all fun.

 

If you want historical accuracy visit a museum:Smile_teethhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
119 posts
4,381 battles
On 6/19/2019 at 12:56 PM, NoobySkooby said:

Seriously why all the fuss over paper ships, all the more to have fun in, were the Conqueror, Montana, GK and now the Georgia, not paper ships, all fun.

 

If you want historical accuracy visit a museum:Smile_teethhappy:

 

The Point is that they are adding fake/never existed except on paper ships when there are still so many actual ships that people want to see/play :cap_horn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×