Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Hannibalurg

Russian Battleship

44 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[-5D-]
Beta Tester
950 posts

What are peoples feelings about the Russian Battleships? Worth spending the time to grind out the lines?

 

Do they arrive this week?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,127 posts
245 battles

I like the peter, but it does take a lot of damage even when angled sometimes, and the dispersion sometimes can be a bit trolly when at close range, doesnt take torps well and secondary range is lacking.

 

but despite that its seems quite solid. Even when against multiple same tier bb’s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles

Sinop is simply brutal, but not a easy ship to make the most out of.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LAFIE]
Beta Tester
7,707 posts
7,856 battles
12 minutes ago, CptBarney said:

Wow, slava just got nuked, r.i.p lol

 

kreml got a sigma buff as well.

That ship (Slava) should just be cancelled, it's a terrible concept.

 

And whoever came up with the idea of a BB that literally rewards camping, fired, out of a cannon, into the sun.

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BHSFL]
[BHSFL]
Players
4,596 posts
29 minutes ago, lafeel said:

Sinop is simply brutal, but not a easy ship to make the most out of.

 

That long bow and mid  section of the ship somehow attracts my AP divebombers....

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
444 posts
5,582 battles

I’ve got the V and VI from boxes and they are ....meh. Don’t feel any inkling to level to the next ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-AP-]
Players
3,503 posts
9,933 battles
52 minutes ago, Hannibalurg said:

What are peoples feelings about the Russian Battleships? Worth spending the time to grind out the lines?

 

Do they arrive this week?

Great interesting ships, except for the current cv dominated meta, which makes the entire concept of pushing brawling battleships redundant and useless.

 

Had they been released a few months ago, they would have made a good addition, but with this meta, they just wont be efficient(talking about the high tiers ones, not low tiers)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,586 battles

Have sinop with some 80-sh k on it and some 600k freexp so i guess i m getting them, soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,978 posts
1 hour ago, gustywinds said:

I’ve got the V and VI from boxes and they are ....meh. Don’t feel any inkling to level to the next ones.

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,194 battles

Played Lenin today and it's pretty good. The only problem for them will be shokaku / Haku / GZ (Enterprise can't citadel them) . 

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,467 posts
22,114 battles

As far as I can see the tier 8+ are the most broken ship line to ever be released into WoWs since Conqueror went live on PSA with Radar.

Armor makes them simply immune to AP and most HE spam with that 60 mm deck (barring - you guessed it : Conqueror!)

Lower tier ones (Sinop and company) are just barely worse than a Gulio Cesare equivalent on their tiers.

Slava is just conceptually :etc_swear:

 

Typical WG

- Rework CVs

- Life now really difficult for close range brawler RU BBs due to CVs and camping meta, since they cant hit anything at range

- buff RU BBs armor to even more obscene levels and add good long-range dispersion (covering their only weakness)

- Release RU BBs and nerf CVs into the ground

- ???

- Profit

 

Anyhow as I've rerolled to CVs exclusively I don't care anymore (Haku AP bombs says Hi!)

Now, the only objective is to make life as miserable as possible for other players untill they either quit the game or reroll CVs themselves.

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,021 posts
11,390 battles
2 hours ago, MacArthur92 said:

Played Lenin today and it's pretty good. The only problem for them will be shokaku / Haku / GZ (Enterprise can't citadel them) . 

 

@El2aZeR 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,194 battles
4 minutes ago, pra3y said:

I meant T9/10 with 60mm deck. Enterprise can't citadel Izumo / Yama / Musashi due to 57mm. At least I tried several times and I couldn't. Didn't have the opportunity to be on Enterprise against Lenin. 2 times tried the Soyuz and couldn't do it. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WCBG]
Beta Tester
2,838 posts
23,907 battles

I have the 4 BBs from missions in the boxes.  I quite like the dispersion at 15km even above that the guns seem to be accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles
8 hours ago, pra3y said:
8 hours ago, MacArthur92 said:

Didn't have the opportunity to be on Enterprise against Lenin. 2 times tried the Soyuz and couldn't do it. 

 

Lenin dies to E's AP DBs so fast it isn't even funny. 4-6 hits aren't a rarity.

Tech tree wise T8 still takes citadels but you have to drop at high altitude. T9/10 are immune.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
13,110 posts
7,885 battles
2 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Lenin dies to E's AP DBs so fast it isn't even funny. 4-6 hits aren't a rarity.

Tech tree wise T8 still takes citadels but you have to drop at high altitude. T9/10 are immune.

 

Dude we all understood by now that Big E is OP AF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
[THESO]
Moderator
4,705 posts
17,888 battles
2 hours ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Lenin dies to E's AP DBs so fast it isn't even funny. 4-6 hits aren't a rarity.

Tech tree wise T8 still takes citadels but you have to drop at high altitude. T9/10 are immune.

I started my shokaku grind last night...

AP bombers on her... that is just rude... plain rude...

and russian BBs... omg they really like to eat those citadels :) I remember a sinop from last night... remember her vaugely..

she dropped out of sight very quickly... :)

 

On the subject,

I've been the part of the tests of RU BBs... I played them a lot...

They are all strong ships.. very strong.. but apart from Kreml.. they really get punished hard.. if you make a boo boo!

 

Kreml on the other hand... DONT YOU DARE TO TOUCH HER!! ehem.. sorry... lost a little bit..

Kreml is fine... ! completely balanced Comrad..

 

WIP!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12,123 posts
62,194 battles
2 hours ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Lenin dies to E's AP DBs so fast it isn't even funny. 4-6 hits aren't a rarity.

Tech tree wise T8 still takes citadels but you have to drop at high altitude. T9/10 are immune.

Ty for answer. I didn't have Lenin against, I know the T8 takes cits having 40mm deck, Lenin has 45mm so wasn't sure.

@Excavatus in fact Haku can take down the Lenin full hp from not complete squad (8-9 planes) . 8 citadels and he's done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,664 battles
16 hours ago, Hannibalurg said:

What are peoples feelings about the Russian Battleships?

FWIW the T7 is quite worthwhile in Narai; I got all four from boxes, and have only really tried the T6-7 in Ops so far.

 

I prefer to play ships that really existed when they're available, so I tend towards other options, but they've been fun so far - I approve of them being apparently optimised for closer ranges (provided the average player realises that they are, and resists the urge to hide on the borders).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×