Jump to content
Server restart - 20/06/2019 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Sir_Rudolfvd

T10 USN CA premium in the making?

10 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
5,436 posts
8,137 battles

And Salem fits the bill just fine, in not beating "super cruisers" in survivability due to lol heal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
788 posts
12,070 battles
41 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

There was no super Alaska...

We all know WG has 'Sekret dacuments' and no problem making paper ships, so its pretty hard to say for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,022 posts
6,146 battles

Nothing has been confirmed, so don't expect anything. But in one Q&A we got this from S_O.

CA-2d.PNG.4546e278a84d8f89b59800e38b570f1f.thumb.png.7305c506d61b89ab42c22bc42d5171ed.png

 

CA2-D is basically a 4x3 305 mm gun design, so Mini-Montana. Assuming the ship keeps in Alaska's tradition, it'd actually be quite promising, given:

  • Alaska is very well-balanced premium that has clear strengths, weaknesses, is comfortable to play at T9 and not redefining any meta.
  • CA2-D would have a clear distinction from any other T10 supercruiser as well as Des Moines, making none of the others obsolete, while potentially contributing something useful.

Thus, even without putting too much trust into vague statements by WG employees, one can at least say that CA2-D has a chance of appearing at some point due to being a premium that would require not too much effort on WG's behalf to get right, given you could really just take the Alaska concept and replicate it at T10 with an added gun turret and (maybe) minor buffs (improving 28 mm upper belt to 30 mm, more AA, T10 radar duration) without creating a monstrosity or some Azuma-style debacle of what to do with that turd.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TSCC]
Players
1,581 posts
18,750 battles

s511-06.jpg

 

Proposed Heavy Cruiser - CA2-D

 

38,700 tons standard displacement

twelve 12"/50 guns,

secondary battery of sixteen 5"/38 guns

speed of 33.5 knots

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4 posts
On 5/13/2019 at 11:33 AM, fumtu said:

s511-06.jpg

 

Proposed Heavy Cruiser - CA2-D

 

38,700 tons standard displacement

twelve 12"/50 guns,

secondary battery of sixteen 5"/38 guns

speed of 33.5 knots

looks a bit like a iowa hull?

 

this would be such a great ship! :cap_money:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
[NWP]
Players
928 posts
7,450 battles

What would it be called? Hawaii? Does it follow CA or BB naming conventions?

 

Looks great by the way, I'd be all over that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KURLA]
Players
890 posts
17,460 battles
On 5/17/2019 at 1:24 PM, Mr_Tayto said:

Does it follow CA or BB naming conventions?

Chances are it would follow the same convention as the Alaskas and be named after a US-territory. (Alaska and Hawaii weren't states yet in WW2)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TSCC]
Players
1,581 posts
18,750 battles
On 5/17/2019 at 1:24 PM, Mr_Tayto said:

What would it be called? Hawaii? Does it follow CA or BB naming conventions?

 

 CB were named by territories not states. Any of four names for canceled Alaska Class is option: Hawaii, PhilippinesPuerto Rico or Samoa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×