[OLEUM] Pinco047 Players 98 posts 20,382 battles Report post #1 Posted April 24, 2019 Hi guys,espcially WG guys.Just watched video announcement regarding the patch.Saw than ships are going live for testers,including IJN Yoshino T10 ship.An Azuma with torps. I want to know,why did You release a ship like T9 Azuma.It was expensive(money or free XP) and even in T5 game this ship would be trash. I just hope WG will buff the armor as I wont ever take Azuma instead of Kronhstadt or Alaska.Azuma def. needs love. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CptBarney Players 8,127 posts 245 battles Report post #2 Posted April 24, 2019 Indeed but they nerfed heavily, you might as well get its bigger sister yoshi. Explains azuma's azur lane characters chest size doe 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #3 Posted April 24, 2019 So you can pay twice for the same toy Isn't capitalism glorious? 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] DFens_666 Players 13,162 posts 11,029 battles Report post #4 Posted April 24, 2019 eh... You have much more damage in your Azuma compared to Kronshtadt/Alaska. Even if you have only 5 battles in it (which can still lower your average damage), it still wouldnt make much sense in saying, that the others are so much better. Yes, Azuma has worse Armor than the other 2, but it seems its able to deal more damage. If you buff armor, then you have to nerf damage output Also, there are infos around about Azuma. It was pretty clear, that its weakpoint is the armor/Citadel. I probably wont get it because of that reason. I rather have Alaska with nice AP. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #5 Posted April 24, 2019 18 minutes ago, Pinco047 said: Hi guys,espcially WG guys.Just watched video announcement regarding the patch.Saw than ships are going live for testers,including IJN Yoshino T10 ship.An Azuma with torps. I want to know,why did You release a ship like T9 Azuma.It was expensive(money or free XP) and even in T5 game this ship would be trash. If you think that, it does not matter how strong the ship is, she will never work for you. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BODEM] FukushuNL Players 1,235 posts 8,476 battles Report post #6 Posted April 24, 2019 1 hour ago, DFens_666 said: eh... You have much more damage in your Azuma compared to Kronshtadt/Alaska. Even if you have only 5 battles in it (which can still lower your average damage), it still wouldnt make much sense in saying, that the others are so much better. Yes, Azuma has worse Armor than the other 2, but it seems its able to deal more damage. If you buff armor, then you have to nerf damage output Also, there are infos around about Azuma. It was pretty clear, that its weakpoint is the armor/Citadel. I probably wont get it because of that reason. I rather have Alaska with nice AP. Nah, you got it the other way around. Apart from it's potential dmg, Azuma got nothing. No armor, no mobility, no tools. If you take Alaska, she got a bit less potential dmg, but she got the tools and she got the armor (dunno where she stands in the mobility hierarchy as all BC are not that manouverable. Alaska, Kron and Stalin don't need anime girls to sell her. They are just good ships. Thank G they got flaws. Edit: OP, would have bought Azuma as I am fiercely anti-radar and wouldn't want to use such a filthy skill against others, as such I'm not buying the other BC as they carry gaydar. So I would have bought T9 Azuma for FXP and T10 Yoshino for coal, but then Azuma came and WG balanced her as a harbor queen. I'm not buying harbor queens for 1 million FXP. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[R3B3L] HystericalAccuracy Players 1,505 posts 40,428 battles Report post #7 Posted April 24, 2019 37 minutes ago, Pinco047 said: Azuma.It was expensive(money or free XP) and even in T5 game this ship would be trash. Wow, really that bad? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #8 Posted April 24, 2019 18 minutes ago, drmajga said: Wow, really that bad? Well, raised citadel of 178mm isn't going to protect against any BB grade munitions, regardless of tier 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DD537] Episparh Players 1,403 posts 20,619 battles Report post #9 Posted April 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Pinco047 said: You release a ship like T9 Azuma.It was expensive(money or free XP) and even in T5 game this ship would be trash. You watch too much Jingles especially when he plays vs Rita in training room... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OLEUM] Pinco047 Players 98 posts 20,382 battles Report post #10 Posted April 24, 2019 Nothing to do with youtubers.I played that ship and agains that ship.So I know how she performs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #11 Posted April 25, 2019 7 hours ago, FukushuNL said: Alaska, Kron and Stalin don't need anime girls to sell her. They are just good ships. Thank G they got flaws. I'd take an Alaska shipgirl any day if the design is well-made. Azuma, the captain is free, but will go on Ibuki, because I am not investing into a ship with even less armour. Am saving up coal for Yoshino though. But yeah, making a ship with a citadel that was designed to work with 30 mm and then taking away the 30 mm plating, I still think it was kinda silly. Even without needing it to be Alaska levels of tanky, having one of the worst armour schemes after Neptune/Mino is pretty terrible. 8 hours ago, Pinco047 said: It was expensive(money or free XP) and even in T5 game this ship would be trash. At T5, if top tier, Azuma would bounce BB ammo and overmatch every cruiser and BB, like a BB. It'd match Kongou in hp and beat her in speed. 9 guns with short reload and much better accuracy. For T9, Azuma isn't getting me excited, but T5 is a tad bit low. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DD537] Episparh Players 1,403 posts 20,619 battles Report post #12 Posted April 25, 2019 7 hours ago, Pinco047 said: Nothing to do with youtubers.I played that ship and agains that ship.So I know how she performs. Then you certainly do something wrong as this ship should not be in range at which t5 can hurt her. She is a long range "glass canon" which should be played in a flank. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BODEM] FukushuNL Players 1,235 posts 8,476 battles Report post #13 Posted April 25, 2019 3 hours ago, Cagliostro_chan said: I'd take an Alaska shipgirl any day if the design is well-made. Azuma, the captain is free, but will go on Ibuki, because I am not investing into a ship with even less armour. Am saving up coal for Yoshino though. But yeah, making a ship with a citadel that was designed to work with 30 mm and then taking away the 30 mm plating, I still think it was kinda silly. Even without needing it to be Alaska levels of tanky, having one of the worst armour schemes after Neptune/Mino is pretty terrible. At T5, if top tier, Azuma would bounce BB ammo and overmatch every cruiser and BB, like a BB. It'd match Kongou in hp and beat her in speed. 9 guns with short reload and much better accuracy. For T9, Azuma isn't getting me excited, but T5 is a tad bit low. O, I'm not doubting those that are fan of the Azur Lane collab wouldn't want Alaska as shipgirl and I don't judge. As a matter of fact, Aurora in my Okt. Revo. and Hipper in my Yorck have brilliant voice overs. But like you mentioned, they even made the Azuma captain obtainable for free now that the namesake ship "is so well received". Coincidense? I don't think so ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLITZ] WeGreedy Players 3,005 posts 15,010 battles Report post #14 Posted April 25, 2019 14 hours ago, Pinco047 said: even in T5 game this ship would be trash. Sorry, but by that statement you clearly show that you have no clue. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BONI] MoveZig Players 1,622 posts 20,823 battles Report post #15 Posted April 25, 2019 12 hours ago, Pinco047 said: even in T5 game this ship would be trash. You're the type of gamer that leaves review scores of 1/10 over a single gripe, aren't you? The ship could use some kind of buff but it would wipe the floor with any t5. Damn, have some sense of proportionality please. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OLEUM] Pinco047 Players 98 posts 20,382 battles Report post #16 Posted April 25, 2019 1 hour ago, B0Tato said: Sorry, but by that statement you clearly show that you have no clue. Oh yeah,teach me! Check the armor layout Einstein before you post anything stupid.Learn the math... Another thing, judge me once you get that ship! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OLEUM] Pinco047 Players 98 posts 20,382 battles Report post #17 Posted April 25, 2019 Guys,I did some testing against T5 BBs,I can delete Azuma with T5 anytime. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #18 Posted April 25, 2019 17 minutes ago, Pinco047 said: Guys,I did some testing against T5 BBs,I can delete Azuma with T5 anytime. And Umikaze can flood Yamato to death. So? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PEZ] Yedwy Players 11,301 posts 39,586 battles Report post #19 Posted April 25, 2019 49 minutes ago, Pinco047 said: Guys,I did some testing against T5 BBs,I can delete Azuma with T5 anytime. A training room bot is hardly a measure of anything Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OCTO] Zen71_sniper [OCTO] Players 1,268 posts 36,636 battles Report post #20 Posted April 25, 2019 Frankly, it is not a bad ship. It can't carry, true - but it is excellent as a support ship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #21 Posted April 25, 2019 55 minutes ago, Pinco047 said: Guys,I did some testing against T5 BBs,I can delete Azuma with T5 anytime. Deleting broadside ships is not the benchmark... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLITZ] WeGreedy Players 3,005 posts 15,010 battles Report post #22 Posted April 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Pinco047 said: Oh yeah,teach me! Check the armor layout Einstein before you post anything stupid.Learn the math... What math? 25 * 14.3 = 357.5? 357.5 > 356? 19 * 14.3 = 271.7? 271.7 < 305? Or to stay at your level: 9 > 5? Just because you checked the armour layout it doesn't mean you have to post anything stupid, like you actually did. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #23 Posted April 25, 2019 31 minutes ago, Yedwy said: A training room bot is hardly a measure of anything You can't get an Azuma bot, I think, as it's no regular tech tree ship. 1 hour ago, Pinco047 said: Guys,I did some testing against T5 BBs,I can delete Azuma with T5 anytime. Go take your Azuma and play it vs T5. Any T5. Even GC. If you have any idea what you are doing, Azuma wipes the floor with them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLITZ] WeGreedy Players 3,005 posts 15,010 battles Report post #24 Posted April 25, 2019 9 minutes ago, Cagliostro_chan said: You can't get an Azuma bot, I think, as it's no regular tech tree ship. You're right, so I guess he got deleted by a T5 bot. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miessa3 Beta Tester 1,650 posts 8,204 battles Report post #25 Posted April 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Panocek said: And Umikaze can flood Yamato to death. So? Well not like before the flooding "buff" though.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
