For CV users only please. Do you find a 2v2 CV matchmaker fun to play?

[SR_FRIOL]

For CV users only please. Do you find a 2v2 CV matchmaker fun to play?

[Uglesett]

Do CVs even care about other CVs after the rework? 

[Egoleter]

2 minutes ago, Uglesett said:

Do CVs even care about other CVs after the rework? 

Not much. Only when no other good target is left.

 

At best I'd place a few fighters in front of an attacking squad or over an area I want protected for a few seconds.

[CptBarney]

No i dont due to the lack of anti-cv support i can provide my team and/or lack of team support (besides spotting and the usual) that my team can greatly benefit from.

 

i've said it before, give cv's more team based planes and mechanics like dropping smoke, hydro bouys, maybe oil slicks to slow down ships (just an idea calm yourself). or even flares to provide some spotting or to highlight a particular area. Maybe gas or fumes to reduce the effectiveness of a ship for awhile (although nothing like the rate arty does it)

[xXx_Blogis_xXx]

nop , cuz always my 2nd cv with 40% wr and always boting

[El2aZeR]

No.

Sick and tired of the dumb 30% s that lose you the match by default.

[Xevious_Red]

Not a fan of 2v2.

 

-1 more CV means 1 less "target"

-Teams are far more static/blob up due to two sets of planes. Static is dull, blobs are frustrating for everyone

-Reduced rewards from spotting

-Two CV parked next to each other are a complete pain to attack with planes even late game

-Good chance I get a useless CV on my team - when its just me I only have to worry about 1 cv being useless, and can directly influence that

-A small part of me feels bad for the unlucky target if both CV decided to focus it, as it will have bombs and torps rain on it.

[FukushuNL]

4 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

No.

Sick and tired of the dumb 30% s that lose you the match by default.

I don't understand, honest. Care to elaborate? 30% what?

 

To the OP: what @Uglesett said. You don't really care what other CVs are in the game, as you can't really do anything against their actions.

[DDMafiaAssociateMember]

I dislike 2v2 CV. Everyone just blobs, which isn't fun for them or the CVs.

[El2aZeR]

9 minutes ago, FukushuNL said:

30% what?

 

30% WR.

[FukushuNL]

8 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

30% WR.

Ok, so what has that to do with the OP's question for other CV captains about how they like the 2 CV  games specifically? 

[El2aZeR]

9 minutes ago, FukushuNL said:

Ok, so what has that to do with the OP's question for other CV captains about how they like the 2 CV  games specifically? 

 

- I play CV

- 30% WR  also plays CV and is on my team

- if both enemy CVs are at least halfway decent it is an almost guaranteed loss unless the majority of the enemy team is horrendously stupid as well or my team is exceptionally amazing

 

Do you get it now?

[FukushuNL]

5 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

- I play CV

- 30% WR  teammate also plays CV and is on my team

- if both enemy CVs are at least halfway decent it is an almost guaranteed loss unless the majority of the enemy team is horrendously stupid as well

 

Do you get it now?

So you are just tired of the 30% wr CVs, period. 

[El2aZeR]

2 minutes ago, FukushuNL said:

So you are just tired of the 30% wr CVs, period. 

 

Generally yes, however since the topic is about 2vs2 CV matches I mean getting a ed CV teammate as a CV specifically.

Why you feel the need to contest that is beyond me.

[JaiFoh]

if it was Two level tier CV's then yes i am ok with it
One up and One Down Tiered CV that is a No

[jss78]

I like them in principle. It's interesting when there's a friendly CV to do a bit of coordination with.

 

Being the target of said coordination may not necessarily be fun. It can become a bit much especially when the CV's are top tier and/or the players know what they're doing.

 

I hope they can balance CV's such that the 2-vs-2 CV games can be kept as part of the gameplay diversity.

[Culiacan_Mexico]

58 minutes ago, xXx_Blogis_xXx said:

nop , cuz always my 2nd cv with 40% wr and always boting

 

53 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

No.

Sick and tired of the dumb 30% s that lose you the match by default.

Nonsense, everyone knows the skill gap was removed with the elimination of RTS CVs! 

 

That was one of there main rational for the change in the first place.

[Xevious_Red]

1 minute ago, Culiacan_Mexico said:

 

Nonsense, everyone knows the skill gap was removed with the elimination of RTS CVs! 

 

That was one of there main rational for the change in the first place.

Well the better player can no longer prevent the worse player from achieving anything.

Now the worse player can achieve nothing all by themselves.

[Namuras]

Don't care... it happens. Isn't all the entertaining for all involved. 

 

Also as Sub_Octavian explained: 2 CVs are going to stay, since MM will apparently not cope all that well and increase the numbers of dumps for CV (and the unlucky 3-4 ships that get matched)

[Beastofwar]

I am 100 % against it as i feel almost all CV nerfs were slapped on to reduce the effects of 2 or even more CV per side.

 

CV aircraft were never game wrecking, but a sky full of aircraft of multiple CV are game wrecking to other players. As for myself i do not want a wrecked game for other players in other classes, not in the least because this is the cause for nerfs coming that wreck my game as well. As a player of these other classes i don't want a sky full or aircraft either.

 

And the only simple solution always was 1 CV per match.....no sky full of aircraft, no sure DD herassment/destruction by aircraft in all caps, no nerfs nessesary at all.

 

 

 

 

[eliastion]

Since it's "limited to CV players" then I'll only reply for my CV experience: yes. The challenges are different, the experience is different, it's a bit different overall but about as fun as 1v1.

 

Problem is - it's only when playing a CV. And even for them it's "about as fun as otherwise". Cruisers don't care too much, BBs... well, this I can't reply as I don't think I've played a BB after the rework (it's my least played class). But then there are DDs. And while it's hardly as unplayable as some claim, DDs most definitely don't appreciate facing 2 CVs at the same time.

 

So, overall... CVs do have fun. But they don't have more fun. Which means that it's not worth the DD suffering.

[destroying_everyone]

guys normally i am playing co-op battle and whan CV got reworked i cant see battles that there are even 1 CV in enemy team i think admins should slove this... what abt u?!

[hgbn_dk]

27 minutes ago, destroying_everyone said:

guys normally i am playing co-op battle and whan CV got reworked i cant see battles that there are even 1 CV in enemy team i think admins should slove this... what abt u?!

Because there is no CV in coop besides the human player... They haven't programmed the bot CV's yet

[1MajorKoenig]

2 hours ago, Alelos said:

For CV users only please. Do you find a 2v2 CV matchmaker fun to play?

 

Happy to post an unpopular opinion: yes 

[loppantorkel]

Yes

- I always get paired with a 70% that makes me win

 

(to my defence, I played the first 6 Furious games in stock mode)