[A77] Luke6_31 Beta Tester 55 posts 8,645 battles Report post #1 Posted March 20, 2019 Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks 41 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 5,207 posts 25,733 battles Report post #2 Posted March 20, 2019 Agreed, it‘s annoying. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BHSFL] Beastofwar [BHSFL] Players 4,596 posts Report post #3 Posted March 20, 2019 Agreed. As a CV player i hate this too. I even think almost all CV nerfs would not have been nessesary if not multiple CV would have been in a match saturating the skies with aircraft. I think it will end when the sky supply box sales end though......then it is not nessesary to shorten CV queue lenghts anymore by doing this. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] DFens_666 Players 13,162 posts 11,029 battles Report post #4 Posted March 20, 2019 Maybe should make a vote then WG sees what the community wants... Guess they wouldnt care anyway, S_O will tell us how we are wrong and whats the reasoning to allow 2 CVs per side 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NOCIT] EgyptOverseer Players 650 posts 6,924 battles Report post #5 Posted March 20, 2019 One year later, after a rework, and my opinion is the same. https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/98881-matchmaking-double-cv/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[P0RT] Admiral_H_Nelson Players 3,938 posts 23,206 battles Report post #6 Posted March 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, Luke6_31 said: Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks While I believe that you are probably correct, this goes against Wargaming's stated objective of getting CVs played more. Didn't they propose that you might have THREE CVs per side at one time. We are no further forward. The Rework has failed IMHO. Wargaming should swallow their pride and go back and rework RTS carriers with the aid of skilled players. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DREAD] 1MajorKoenig Players 13,110 posts 7,885 battles Report post #7 Posted March 20, 2019 31 minutes ago, Luke6_31 said: Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks Nope. Keep it. 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #8 Posted March 20, 2019 Agreed. I'm sick and tired of losing by default just because my CV teammate is a complete and I have to compensate for two enemy CVs instead of just one. 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] eliastion Players 4,795 posts 12,260 battles Report post #9 Posted March 20, 2019 18 minutes ago, Admiral_H_Nelson said: While I believe that you are probably correct, this goes against Wargaming's stated objective of getting CVs played more. Didn't they propose that you might have THREE CVs per side at one time. Actually, they claimed that the "max three" option was there to accomodate the inevitable high tide of CVs post-rework. Thing is, however, the high tide has clearly passed. We wouldn't have any problem with CVs waiting too long even if a hard 1/team limit was brought back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LUXX] thisismalacoda Players 595 posts Report post #10 Posted March 20, 2019 Absolutely no; keep it. If a class is balanced, why would two ships of the balanced class be problematic? 4 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WGP2W] LemonadeWarriorITA [WGP2W] Beta Tester 1,669 posts 8,186 battles Report post #11 Posted March 20, 2019 Having one in a match is just as terrible... I hope they find a way for more interaction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BS4] SeaWolf7 Players 1,818 posts 10,056 battles Report post #12 Posted March 20, 2019 21 minutes ago, thisismalacoda said: Absolutely no; keep it. If a class is balanced, why would two ships of the balanced class be problematic? WTF? One good cv player can turn the tide of a battle quite sufficiently... So Hell no! 2 CV games DD gameplay is utterly pointless atm, perma spotted and focused to oblivion in most games + game cant cope graphically when it gets really hectic with 2 cv's ... 1 cv per game is quite sufficient IMO for balance..... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BS4] SeaWolf7 Players 1,818 posts 10,056 battles Report post #13 Posted March 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Luke6_31 said: Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks As @DFens_666 said, Op Can you do a poll so we can perhaps see a clear show of hands . Cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BHSFL] Beastofwar [BHSFL] Players 4,596 posts Report post #14 Posted March 20, 2019 27 minutes ago, thisismalacoda said: Absolutely no; keep it. If a class is balanced, why would two ships of the balanced class be problematic? Too many eyes in the sky....this is cause to be hit by the nerf bat, what no one really wants.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LUXX] thisismalacoda Players 595 posts Report post #15 Posted March 20, 2019 Vor 6 Minuten, SeaWolf7 sagte: WTF? One good cv player can turn the tide of a battle quite sufficiently... So Hell no! 2 CV games DD gameplay is utterly pointless atm, perma spotted and focused to oblivion in most games + game cant cope graphically when it gets really hectic with 2 cv's ... 1 cv per game is quite sufficient IMO for balance..... Google 'material conditional as a truth function'. Also please be aware that I interact with meme-posters once; kind regards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TF57] martin035 Players 103 posts 11,874 battles Report post #16 Posted March 20, 2019 MY My Nicholas might disagree with you, 47k of bonus XP 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SOKRN] BlackFish__ Players 182 posts 15,694 battles Report post #17 Posted March 20, 2019 I concur with OP. Even one CV is too much but still much better than two per side. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EUR] lossi_2018 Players 3,122 posts Report post #18 Posted March 20, 2019 2 hours ago, Luke6_31 said: Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks I agree Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] ClappingLollies Players 1,953 posts Report post #19 Posted March 20, 2019 Its not fun for CV players, and its not fun for surface ships. Just get rid of it WG. No point Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CROTZ] AirSupremacy Beta Tester 1,209 posts 12,485 battles Report post #20 Posted March 20, 2019 I found the 3v3 CV matches the most awesome, sadly that happened only on day 1 for me. 32-64 players in random matches would be a great addition :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skurfa Beta Tester 809 posts Report post #21 Posted March 20, 2019 I would just wish there would be more CV vs. CV action.... like actually using figthers for what they were designed to, namely kill other aircraft. If figthers had that option, I wouldn't even mind them buffing the damage for carriers again. The entire CV game is broken now, before they at least were using time fighting each other as well, and figthers were a deterrent.... now a days they're just flying about damaging or scouting, and they can do so without even noticing the other team has a CV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BONUS] Hedgehog1963 [BONUS] Beta Tester 3,211 posts 14,951 battles Report post #22 Posted March 20, 2019 Yes. One carrier is sufficient. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BONUS] Yamato942 Players 323 posts 20,034 battles Report post #23 Posted March 20, 2019 I agree with you all, two cv is too much, if two tier10s even worse but you do know that if we only have one cv per metch a lot of match will contain cv, which mean almost no match will be without cv, i dont have problem with that but some of you may have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HAMAR] Puffin_ Players 737 posts Report post #24 Posted March 21, 2019 Destroys the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sgtmarple Players 202 posts 1,024 battles Report post #25 Posted March 21, 2019 Vor 16 Stunden, SeaWolf7 sagte: WTF? One good cv player can turn the tide of a battle quite sufficiently... So Hell no! 2 CV games DD gameplay is utterly pointless atm, perma spotted and focused to oblivion in most games + game cant cope graphically when it gets really hectic with 2 cv's ... 1 cv per game is quite sufficient IMO for balance..... I had games with up to 5 DDs...that is so much for BBs btw. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
