NO MORE TWO CV GAMES

[Luke6_31]

Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it.

 

Thanks

[Jethro_Grey]

Agreed, it‘s annoying. 

 

 

[Beastofwar]

Agreed. As a CV player i hate this too.  I even think almost all CV nerfs would not have been nessesary if not multiple CV would have been in a match saturating the skies with aircraft.

 

I think it will end when the sky supply box sales end though......then it is not nessesary to shorten CV queue lenghts anymore by doing this.

[DFens_666]

Maybe should make a vote then WG sees what the community wants...

Guess they wouldnt care anyway, S_O will tell us how we are wrong and whats the reasoning to allow 2 CVs per side

[EgyptOverseer]

One year later, after a rework, and my opinion is the same.

 

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/98881-matchmaking-double-cv/

[Admiral_H_Nelson]

26 minutes ago, Luke6_31 said:

Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it.

 

Thanks

While I believe that you are probably correct, this goes against Wargaming's stated objective of getting CVs played more.

Didn't they propose that you might have THREE CVs per side at one time.

 

We are no further forward. The Rework has failed IMHO. Wargaming should swallow their pride and go back and rework RTS carriers with the aid of skilled players.

[1MajorKoenig]

31 minutes ago, Luke6_31 said:

Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it.

 

Thanks

 

Nope. Keep it.

[El2aZeR]

Agreed. I'm sick and tired of losing by default just because my CV teammate is a complete  and I have to compensate for two enemy CVs instead of just one.

[eliastion]

18 minutes ago, Admiral_H_Nelson said:

While I believe that you are probably correct, this goes against Wargaming's stated objective of getting CVs played more.

Didn't they propose that you might have THREE CVs per side at one time.

Actually, they claimed that the "max three" option was there to accomodate the inevitable high tide of CVs post-rework.

Thing is, however, the high tide has clearly passed. We wouldn't have any problem with CVs waiting too long even if a hard 1/team limit was brought back.

[thisismalacoda]

Absolutely no; keep it. If a class is balanced, why would two ships of the balanced class be problematic?

[LemonadeWarriorITA]

Having one in a match is just as terrible... I hope they find a way for more interaction.

[SeaWolf7]

21 minutes ago, thisismalacoda said:

Absolutely no; keep it. If a class is balanced, why would two ships of the balanced class be problematic?

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? One good cv player can turn the tide of a battle quite sufficiently... So Hell no! 2 CV games DD gameplay is utterly pointless atm, perma spotted and focused to oblivion in most games + game cant cope graphically when it gets really hectic with 2 cv's ...

1 cv per game is quite sufficient IMO for balance.....

 

 

 

[SeaWolf7]

1 hour ago, Luke6_31 said:

Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it.

 

Thanks

As @DFens_666 said, Op Can you do a poll so we can perhaps see a clear show of hands . Cheers.

[Beastofwar]

27 minutes ago, thisismalacoda said:

Absolutely no; keep it. If a class is balanced, why would two ships of the balanced class be problematic?

 

Too many eyes in the sky....this is cause to be hit by the nerf bat, what no one really wants....

[thisismalacoda]

Vor 6 Minuten, SeaWolf7 sagte:

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? One good cv player can turn the tide of a battle quite sufficiently... So Hell no! 2 CV games DD gameplay is utterly pointless atm, perma spotted and focused to oblivion in most games + game cant cope graphically when it gets really hectic with 2 cv's ...

1 cv per game is quite sufficient IMO for balance.....

 

 

 

Google 'material conditional as a truth function'.

Also please be aware that I interact with meme-posters once; kind regards.

[martin035]

MY

 

My Nicholas might disagree with you, 47k of bonus XP 

[BlackFish__]

I concur with OP. Even one CV is too much but still much better than two per side.

[lossi_2018]

2 hours ago, Luke6_31 said:

Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it.

 

Thanks

I agree

[ClappingLollies]

Its not fun for CV players, and its not fun for surface ships. Just get rid of it WG. No point

[AirSupremacy]

I found the 3v3 CV matches the most awesome, sadly that happened only on day 1 for me.

32-64 players in random matches would be a great addition :)

[Skurfa]

I would just wish there would be more CV vs. CV action.... like actually using figthers for what they were designed to, namely kill other aircraft.

 

If figthers had that option, I wouldn't even mind them buffing the damage for carriers again.

 

The entire CV game is broken now, before they at least were using time fighting each other as well, and figthers were a deterrent.... now a days they're just flying about damaging or scouting, and they can do so without even noticing the other team has a CV.

[Hedgehog1963]

Yes.  One  carrier is sufficient.

 

[Yamato942]

I agree with you all, two cv is too much, if two tier10s even worse but you do know that if we only have one cv per metch a lot of match will contain cv, which mean almost no match will be without cv, i dont have problem with that but some of you may have.

[Puffin_]

Destroys the game

[sgtmarple]

Vor 16 Stunden, SeaWolf7 sagte:

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? One good cv player can turn the tide of a battle quite sufficiently... So Hell no! 2 CV games DD gameplay is utterly pointless atm, perma spotted and focused to oblivion in most games + game cant cope graphically when it gets really hectic with 2 cv's ...

1 cv per game is quite sufficient IMO for balance.....

 

 

 

I had games with up to 5 DDs...that is so much for BBs btw.