[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,292 battles Report post #1 Posted March 19, 2019 https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/uss-georgia-ebeca0bf61c34c7d8641493ed59d3a44 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SOG-] You_Overextended Players 330 posts 8,853 battles Report post #2 Posted March 19, 2019 Looks like USN is going to get its own Gneisenau. :P 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
therealVanquisher Players 145 posts 9,883 battles Report post #3 Posted March 19, 2019 Is it this: Hit points – 74100. Plating - 32 mm.Main battery - 3x2 457 mm. Firing range - 21.0 km.Maximum HE shell damage – 6450. Chance to cause fire – 43%. Maximum AP shell damage - 15750.Reload time - 30.0 s. 180 degree turn time - 45.0 s. Maximum dispersion - 270 м.HE initial velocity - 800 m/s. AP initial velocity - 732 m/s. Sigma – 2.00.Secondary Armament:10x2 127.0 mm, range - 6.0 km.Maximum HE shell damage – 1800. Chance to cause fire – 5%. HE initial velocity - 792 m/s AA defense:40x1 20.0 mm.10x2 127.0 mm.16x4 40.0 mm.AA defense short-range: continuous damage per second - 652, hit probability - 68 %, action zone 0.1-1.5 km;AA defense mid-range: number of explosions in a salvo - 11, damage within an explosion - 980, continuous damage per second - 564, hit probability - 73 %, action zone 1.5-3.5 km;AA defense long-range: number of explosions in a salvo - 8, damage within an explosion - 1540, continuous damage per second - 260, hit probability - 73 %, action zone 3.5-5.8 km;AA sector reinforcement - 25 %, sector reinforcement and reinforcement shift time - 12 s. Maximum speed - 33 kt. Turning circle radius - 890 m. Rudder shift time – 16.5 s. Surface detectability – 16.9 km. Air detectability – 14.1 km. Detectability after firing main guns in smoke – 18.0 km. Available consumables:1 slot - Damage Control Party2 slot - Repair Party3 slot - Fighter/Spotting Aircraft ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WGP2W] LemonadeWarriorITA [WGP2W] Beta Tester 1,669 posts 8,186 battles Report post #4 Posted March 19, 2019 Those barrels look almost longer than the nose of Russian battleships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] Blixies Beta Tester, Players 2,160 posts 6,904 battles Report post #5 Posted March 19, 2019 3 hours ago, mlgomez said: Looks like USN is going to get its own Gneisenau. :P Except the gun size is humongous on this one. If this is tier 7, it's gonna be overpen city. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KAKE] Uglesett Players 2,804 posts 6,795 battles Report post #6 Posted March 19, 2019 6 minutes ago, Blixies said: Except the gun size is humongous on this one. If this is tier 7, it's gonna be overpen city. They're 457s, and it's T9. Basically, imagine if the Gneisenau moved to America and got fat. 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ONE2] RAHJAILARI Players 3,160 posts 31,670 battles Report post #7 Posted March 19, 2019 No no, @_V_e_N_o_M_my friend. You've got this all wrong. it' not that the guns are long, it's just that the ship is too short, that's all. But Hmmm... 457mm at tier ??? I wonder.... 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] Blixies Beta Tester, Players 2,160 posts 6,904 battles Report post #8 Posted March 19, 2019 Just now, Uglesett said: They're 457s, and it's T9. Basically, imagine if the Gneisenau moved to America and got fat. 6 guns at tier 9? Whew lad, they better reload fast. They reload 30 seconds. I guess, they will be super accurate then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flavio1997 ∞ Alpha Tester 1,006 posts 11,990 battles Report post #9 Posted March 19, 2019 48 minutes ago, Blixies said: 6 guns at tier 9? Whew lad, they better reload fast. They reload 30 seconds. I guess, they will be super accurate then? the problem is that they wont Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,292 battles Report post #10 Posted March 19, 2019 Is this a us design or purely a wg creation?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HOO] Fat_Maniac [HOO] Players 2,337 posts 4,238 battles Report post #11 Posted March 19, 2019 10 minutes ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said: Is this a us design or purely a wg creation?? Well she certainly is not BB-15 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,292 battles Report post #12 Posted March 19, 2019 7 minutes ago, Fat_Maniac said: Well she certainly is not BB-15 See this is the area that disturbs me most, the possibility that WG creates their own ships from real life inspirations but NOT actually based on any real plans. I know RU BBs are not all entirely based on real designs some parts of their design are pure fantasy I know it. The shio design quality is much lower than blureprint or realife counterparts. Will this culture be the doom of wows when WG start inventing their own ships to fill gaps in a techline..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ONE2] RAHJAILARI Players 3,160 posts 31,670 battles Report post #13 Posted March 19, 2019 1 hour ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said: Is this a us design or purely a wg creation?? Well, there were certainly studies made on equipping the projected Montana with 18" guns and also quite a few earlier studies were made prior to that including one for using 18" dual-mount gun turrets. So my guess is that WG made this up based on the assumption that USN would have probably converted one (or utilized identical newly-built hull) or some Iowa-class BB into an 6*18" gun BB first and that Georgia's specs are based on that assumption, which sounds reasonable, after all this is exactly how Gneisenau was planned to be upgunned from 280mm to 381 and the same principle was considered for the IJN's "Super Yamato" A-150 design as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CptBarney Players 8,127 posts 245 battles Report post #14 Posted March 19, 2019 21 minutes ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said: See this is the area that disturbs me most, the possibility that WG creates their own ships from real life inspirations but NOT actually based on any real plans. I know RU BBs are not all entirely based on real designs some parts of their design are pure fantasy I know it. The shio design quality is much lower than blureprint or realife counterparts. Will this culture be the doom of wows when WG start inventing their own ships to fill gaps in a techline..... I seriously doubt since wargaming will screw up in someother way. Either way i prefer ships to be balanced and could careless whether they are fictional or not and they can simply use existing ships as bench marks of what to and not to do when making brand new ships. For design again they can take bits from other ships change them around innovate them then slap them on to new ships. In game design fun>balance>everything else. At least thats what i've been taught so far. Also they can make the models less poly intense and so gives our pc's more time calculate other things. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #15 Posted March 19, 2019 The main guns are decent, it has a bit better long/mid range accuracy than other US 406mm guns battleships The ship has excellent secondaries accuracy but lacks secondaries range. It can melt nearby DDs without help from manual secondary skill The rear turret has a small dead angle where it cannot depress to shoot close target... Yes, it is a T9 Gneisenau Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DK-CP] NothingButTheRain Players 6,338 posts 14,259 battles Report post #16 Posted March 19, 2019 4 hours ago, CptBarney said: I seriously doubt since wargaming will screw up in someother way. Either way i prefer ships to be balanced and could careless whether they are fictional or not and they can simply use existing ships as bench marks of what to and not to do when making brand new ships. For design again they can take bits from other ships change them around innovate them then slap them on to new ships. In game design fun>balance>everything else. At least thats what i've been taught so far. Also they can make the models less poly intense and so gives our pc's more time calculate other things. I do prefer paper ships over completely made up ships tho. To me it has to be at least kinda plausible. But I agree, THE main thing is that it's supposed to be fun (and plz no P2W, Wargaming ) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-FF-] elblancogringo Players 1,207 posts 7,342 battles Report post #17 Posted March 19, 2019 4 hours ago, Darth_Glorious said: Yes, it is a T9 Gneisenau Where are my torps?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #18 Posted March 19, 2019 They're 457mm guns (18in). Fun fact, 50 caliber long 457mm gun will be noticably longer than a 50 caliber 406mm gun, as the caliber is the number of times you can divide the barrel length by the diameter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,292 battles Report post #19 Posted March 19, 2019 Someone pointed out the distance between the the two middle secondary turrets is big, kinda of a blindspot... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #20 Posted March 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said: Someone pointed out the distance between the the two middle secondary turrets is big, kinda of a blindspot... Good spot for aiming reference too, as it looks right over the machinery spaces. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[N_R_A] Hopeless_Guppy Players 3,753 posts Report post #21 Posted March 19, 2019 Should we be worried about the sale of tier 9 ships? Not even WoT's has gone that far. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,292 battles Report post #22 Posted March 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, lafeel said: Good spot for aiming reference too, as it looks right over the machinery spaces. More like CV sweepspot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CptBarney Players 8,127 posts 245 battles Report post #23 Posted March 19, 2019 30 minutes ago, NothingButTheRain said: I do prefer paper ships over completely made up ships tho. To me it has to be at least kinda plausible. But I agree, THE main thing is that it's supposed to be fun (and plz no P2W, Wargaming ) True i see your point i do like historical ships, just that if gaps need filling they shouldn’t be afraid to use made up designs (should of worded my post better xD). And yeah no P2W its one of the few games i play consistently. hmm i wonder if those french battlecruisers will ever see light? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LAFIE] lafeel Beta Tester 7,707 posts 7,856 battles Report post #24 Posted March 19, 2019 1 minute ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said: More like CV sweepspot I don't know, sure looks like a perfect spot to land my ap shells on. Or rather just below that exact same spot. ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,292 battles Report post #25 Posted March 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, CptBarney said: hmm i wonder if those french battlecruisers will ever see light? hmmmm? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites