Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Excavatus

Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

8,620 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts
1 minute ago, gabberworld said:

 

i may say this other way as well. i give you 100 euros and then you give me 100 euro back, how much euros you have now?

 

i give you 200 euros and you give me back 100 euros, how much you have now?

100....which is 50% of 200....not 60 or literally any other number.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
1 minute ago, SV_Kompresor said:

100....which is 50% of 200....not 60 or literally any other number.

 

yes of course its 50% but if you have own 300 euros at pocket to you lose that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts
5 minutes ago, gabberworld said:

 

yes of course its 50% but if you have own 300 euros at pocket to you lose that?

I literally have no idea what you are talking about right now. Your example has no connection to this whatsoever. What does your example have to do with averages exactly?

 

Let's take my wr as an example. If I were to try and maintain it, I need to win around 1.55 battles for every loss. That is a simple fact. If I win more than this my wr rises, if I win less than this my wr falls. And what a surprise, 1 victory per 1 loss is in fact less than 1.55 victories for every loss.

 

7 minutes ago, arquata2019 said:

@gabberworld and @SV_Kompresor doing basic math be like

Not like I have anything better to do.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
19 minutes ago, SV_Kompresor said:

I literally have no idea what you are talking about right now.

 

 

i not even read what others started talk about that winrate :cap_haloween: i just continue talk whatever comes to my mind. LOL

 

you know there is allot different recommendations in this thread and its like year or two old now and none off those used yet

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts
9 hours ago, gabberworld said:

 

i may say this other way as well. i give you 100 euros and then you give me 100 euro back, how much euros you have now?

 

i give you 200 euros and you give me back 100 euros, how much you have now?

Epic trolling or sad intelligence. Your pick

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
8 hours ago, GoneFishingAgain said:

WG's idea of good balanced mm

image.thumb.png.17179e9ed90afe2ce9559944972a7e35.png

 

i been thinking about that some time now, maybe its purpose for make it fun to everyone or they test how good nerves players had, who knows, it can be easily that other team players had exactly same battles before you had, we not know that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
4 hours ago, 159Hunter said:

Epic trolling or sad intelligence. Your pick

 

some people claim here that when i give you 100 euros and then you give me 100 euros back and then you have 50% off that what i give but really its 0%

 

also some claim in here if you had own 300 euros in pocked you will lose at that some % after you give me back 100 euros

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
1 hour ago, gabberworld said:

 

some people claim here that when i give you 100 euros and then you give me 100 euros back and then you have 50% off that what i give but really its 0%

 

also some claim in here if you had own 300 euros in pocked you will lose at that some % after you give me back 100 euros

 

Thats because playing more games is like increasing the 100 euros :fish_palm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,374 posts
11,735 battles
2 hours ago, gabberworld said:

some people claim here that when i give you 100 euros and then you give me 100 euros back and then you have 50% off that what i give but really its 0%

 

also some claim in here if you had own 300 euros in pocked you will lose at that some % after you give me back 100 euros 

 

wow.. in this case, for once its really in place: you need to go to your parents or teacher and ask them to teach you percentage. Not an insult, not a flame, just the hard truth. I gave you a perfect example, which you just refuse to read/answer/understand. Dont be ignorant, dont give yourself up. Its never too late to get educated.

 

You can start here: http://www.math.com/students/calculators/source/3percent.htm

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
8 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

wow.. in this case, for once its really in place: you need to go to your parents or teacher and ask them to teach you percentage. Not an insult, not a flame, just the hard truth. I gave you a perfect example, which you just refuse to read/answer/understand. Dont be ignorant, dont give yourself up. Its never too late to get educated.

 

You can start here: http://www.math.com/students/calculators/source/3percent.htm

 

 

 

win and lose  can be calculated different way

 

i have 3706 victories and 3646 Defeats at Random

 

what leads me that i actually win as profit the 60 battles

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[INCAP]
Players
395 posts
62,810 battles

wins - losses  hmmmmmmm  16402-14972 = 1430 wins profit thats why iam a billioner in credits lolsimage.thumb.png.5d1bc8ef562a71d492cb5a62e90f113c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
1 hour ago, surfer_gr said:

wins - losses  hmmmmmmm  16402-14972 = 1430 wins profit thats why iam a billioner in credits lolsimage.thumb.png.5d1bc8ef562a71d492cb5a62e90f113c.png

 

can i have some of your credit :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
220 posts
8,336 battles

THe MM right now is really crap, i rather wait longer to play with people at same lv with me than than playing with player who is worse than bot. 

 

I just finished a game with a DD player like this, who running around and do nothing, mean while the enemie's dd is spotting us, I just want to play with someone who know what to do in game, not these people and afk

 players. 

 

The report system is really a joke too, i don't know what WG can do with report they get from player 

image.png.14e3c29cecf700ebb12157f3f812384c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
[TTT]
Players
1,711 posts
34,942 battles
On 11/13/2020 at 5:21 PM, ForlornSailor said:

 

Thats true. Has been like that ever since they eased the T8 mm. IMO its much worse to face T9s as a T7 then playing against T10 when beeing a T8 ship tho.

I dont feel like playing T7 anymore, eventhough it used to be my favourite Tier.

Yesterday was really bad for me as well, just couldn't realize if these were actual people and not bots.  Pommern sailed straight into the enemy without using hydro to spot a dd that was just 3km from him allowing that survive on barely 1k hp... You can guess the rest.

On another match that miraculously we won we had 3 full hp Vermonts chasing a daring while my division of 3 (tier 9s) with just another extra ship were holding off 3/4 of the enemy fleet on the other side of the map.  When asked for help Vermonts replied that they were trying really hard and I got reported without using any bad language at all...  (These were just 2 of the many horrible experiences I had)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LSCA]
Players
2,104 posts
16,946 battles
38 minutes ago, tsounts said:

Yesterday was really bad for me as well, just couldn't realize if these were actual people and not bots.  Pommern sailed straight into the enemy without using hydro to spot a dd that was just 3km from him allowing that survive on barely 1k hp... You can guess the rest.

On another match that miraculously we won we had 3 full hp Vermonts chasing a daring while my division of 3 (tier 9s) with just another extra ship were holding off 3/4 of the enemy fleet on the other side of the map.  When asked for help Vermonts replied that they were trying really hard and I got reported without using any bad language at all...  (These were just 2 of the many horrible experiences I had)

 

i notice one day when i played at tier 5 that bots have some intelligence, basically what they todo is when you puch then they puch with you as team, and when you camp then they todo that as well

 

it feels like sometimes its better play with bots than those clueless users

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
[TTT]
Players
1,711 posts
34,942 battles
1 hour ago, gabberworld said:

 

i notice one day when i played at tier 5 that bots have some intelligence, basically what they todo is when you puch then they puch with you as team, and when you camp then they todo that as well

 

it feels like sometimes its better play with bots than those clueless users

Yeah, you'd expect people with 15k-20k battles at least have some on clue on how to play but when you see in the end that their winrates are 41-46%....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FJAKA]
Players
457 posts
15,659 battles

Tier 10 battles these days. 13 min. mark, all DDs dead. No CVs, except one Moskva, no radars. Big sad.

 

dd.jpg.748496fd9dac3ca823beb4b778392801.jpg

 

Now let's wait for some DD mains to open up threads labelled ''BbS dO yOuR dAmN JoB''.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
220 posts
8,336 battles
Il y a 7 minutes, DFens_666 a dit :

 

Easy: Enemies have more battles played

giphy.gif

well done captain =)))

in average you see it well balanced but when you look at battles played, the enemie team have more battles with same average wr  wich mean they are more consistent, the game gave my team bunch of new captain. Maybe they are smurf but it is not balance 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×