Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Excavatus

Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

8,620 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,177 battles
8 minutes ago, hardkur911 said:

just get better .... i can troll on forums , let me knew where i can apply , u get payed for that right ?

See, when you play well, it improves your chances to win greatly. Good job :cap_like:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST0RM]
Players
96 posts
15,411 battles
10 minutes ago, SexyBikiniGirl said:

Perfect tip. I applied that to "the Pete" immediately.

he bring nothing to these conversation its just annoying after a while , he defend these matchmaking like it was his child and play 13 games per week for some reason

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST0RM]
Players
96 posts
15,411 battles
1 minute ago, SexyBikiniGirl said:

The battle type does not have enough players in queue yet to balance anything...

and yet when game start there is 24 players that could be put in these 2 teams with some logic and balance no ?

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
402 posts
27,265 battles
1 minute ago, SexyBikiniGirl said:

The battle type does not have enough players in queue yet to balance anything...

There are options beyond just balancing both teams by wr, it takes some creativity, something WG lacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CSADD]
Players
172 posts
Just now, hardkur911 said:

and yet when game start there is 24 players that could be put in these 2 teams with some logic and balance no ?

Probably not. Their WR and number of battles played per account and per ship does not seem to make it possible for these amount of players in the queue.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CSADD]
Players
172 posts
1 minute ago, Captaindanz said:

There are options beyond just balancing both teams by wr, it takes some creativity, something WG lacks.

Well, has WG ever been transparent about MM? Probably not because it would void any future copyright claims on their patent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,177 battles
16 minutes ago, hardkur911 said:

he bring nothing to these conversation its just annoying after a while , he defend these matchmaking like it was his child and play 13 games per week for some reason

You are mistaken, once again. I play more than that.

I average 21 random battles per week this year + another 8 clan battles per week.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
402 posts
27,265 battles
9 minutes ago, SexyBikiniGirl said:

Well, has WG ever been transparent about MM? Probably not because it would void any future copyright claims on their patent.

They did, they had an excuse as well, by saying randoms are not competitive and that's where it ended, by saying that they didn't wanted to fix ranked MM either, and that's why we got this big thread here, so everyone can raise all of theirs concerns while WG will keep counting the money.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
83 posts
8,063 battles

Translation:Defeat!

150k dmg with t5 tech tree ship,result is defeat.

Also i have a chat ban due to insults,what a comedy:)) Im insulting them,because they deserve it.

IMG_9297.JPG

IMG_9298.JPG

  • Cool 3
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts
4 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

See, when you play well, it improves your chances to win greatly. Good job :cap_like:

You're slacking Pete. All names are blacked out, so how can you be sure it was his own result?

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST0RM]
Players
96 posts
15,411 battles

it look like that when u play between 4-6 at night when all lemmings sleep . and u must not tottaly suck , and be sober .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
83 posts
8,063 battles

How about separating above and below %50 win rated players in matches?That would be rewarding for good players and push bad players to use their brain more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
4 minutes ago, zekai7498 said:

How about separating above and below %50 win rated players in matches?That would be rewarding for good players and push bad players to use their brain more.

 

And you couldnt figure out what happens, if below 50% players only play amongst each other? (same with above 50% ofc).

Should they still only win 40% of the time, or would they actually be drawn to 50% :cap_hmm:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,374 posts
11,735 battles
9 minutes ago, zekai7498 said:

How about separating above and below %50 win rated players in matches?That would be rewarding for good players and push bad players to use their brain more.

 

How would that make ((them)) use their brain more tho?

By that logic, you just have to catch all the braindeads in reallife, lock them up in one facility and after one year, you unlock the door again and a million Einsteins run out.

 

Might sound harsh but in all honesty: you can only learn something, if you see the possibilites. A parallel universe-gameserver with only 40% would be heaven of HE-Spamming Yamatos, which would be concidered the god level play. Among the blind, the one-eyes is king etc.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
83 posts
8,063 battles
2 dakika önce, DFens_666 dedi:

 

And you couldnt figure out what happens, if below 50% players only play amongst each other? (same with above 50% ofc).

Should they still only win 40% of the time, or would they actually be drawn to 50% :cap_hmm:

Yes,but this equalyzes itself,bad ones cant win consistently so cant climb %50.Good ones cant lose always i believe.

But there is something another,no one can blame mm anymore.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHEFT]
Players
13,162 posts
11,029 battles
2 minutes ago, zekai7498 said:

Yes,but this equalyzes itself,bad ones cant win consistently so cant climb %50.Good ones cant lose always i believe.

 

10 players, each has 40% with 10 games played, so 4wins and 6 losses.

Now we let them play ONLY amongst each other for 10 more games. Lets assume, everyone wins 5 games and loses 5 games.

They have now 20 games played, 9 wins and 11 losses. Whats the new WR? 9w out of 20 games is 45% WR... So everyone starts with 40%, and everyone now has 45% WR. Eventually, they would all have 50%, some sooner some later, since they ofc wouldnt equally win 50%, some would win a bit more, and get to 50% WR faster than others.

Same happens to >50% WR players ofc, and at some point, the system defeated itself because everyone has 50% WR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
83 posts
8,063 battles
8 dakika önce, DFens_666 dedi:

 

10 players, each has 40% with 10 games played, so 4wins and 6 losses.

Now we let them play ONLY amongst each other for 10 more games. Lets assume, everyone wins 5 games and loses 5 games.

They have now 20 games played, 9 wins and 11 losses. Whats the new WR? 9w out of 20 games is 45% WR... So everyone starts with 40%, and everyone now has 45% WR. Eventually, they would all have 50%, some sooner some later, since they ofc wouldnt equally win 50%, some would win a bit more, and get to 50% WR faster than others.

Same happens to >50% WR players ofc, and at some point, the system defeated itself because everyone has 50% WR.

True,this is cold math of course.But,this separates best of the best and worst of the worst in the end anyway,prevents one sided matches,gives a message to players 

''who shines,wins''

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
83 posts
8,063 battles
4 saat önce, buttonF1 dedi:

its very hard to win this days no matter what i do...
5 in row always 2-3 afk 

Same goes for me,all lost but 2 try hard games.I wanna find these idiots and hit their emty heads with brick.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×