Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
achim1968

Nice tin hat and conspiracy theories

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[DGT]
Players
15 posts
7,930 battles

Besides publicated data there are some nice conspiracy ideas...

  1. The reason for landslide losses is that good winrate players are drawn by lots to beginners?
  2. The probability for super containers is dependent on your last game rankings?
  3. Spawn location is dependent on your "skill"?
  4. Matchmaking is dependent on winrate, number of games, personal rating, premium?
  5. Matchmaking is dependend on the winrate of your division partners?
  6. Divisions get worse matchmaking?
  7. With full AA build there are less CVs?
  8. Dispersion is better if you're not moving?
  9. Spotter planes increases accuracy tremendously?
  10. Dispersion is dependent on winrate, number of games, personal rating, premium?
     

What kind of theories have you heard?

Do you think some of them are plausible or which ones are nonsens?

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[YARRR]
Beta Tester
8,204 posts
14,454 battles

"Better CV player on enemy team = instant loss" or the other way around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[4_0_4]
Players
4,815 posts
10,976 battles

Always wrong decision considering Def-AA or Hydro

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
15,931 posts
11,179 battles
56 minutes ago, achim1968 said:

Do you think some of them are plausible...

None.

And it is called tinfoil hat...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC-DK]
Players
2,408 posts
24,407 battles

Can I open up a tinfoil hat shop here?? Seems to be a good spot.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLITZ]
Players
2,193 posts
9,396 battles

I'll take you to the tinfoil shop...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BOATY]
[BOATY]
Players
664 posts
9,658 battles

@achim1968 although I know that this theories are ridiculous, almost all of them matching my recent experience (recent... last 6 months)

:Smile_unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,432 posts
9,427 battles

"Matchmaking is influenced by your recent battle results."

 

Oh wait, WG actually mentions that in the patent on their matchmaking system. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOXIC]
[TOXIC]
Players
4,358 posts
11,268 battles
1 hour ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

"Matchmaking is influenced by your recent battle results."

 

Oh wait, WG actually mentions that in the patent on their matchmaking system. 

And it can be clearly shown that none of the options described in that patent are actually used. Try again. 

Or, in fact, you should probably start by actually reading that patent. All the people I've seen invoking it so far as "proof" of MM manipulation seem to have not only mixed up "holding a patent" with "having implemented the contents" - they have no idea what the contents actually are.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,432 posts
9,427 battles
4 hours ago, eliastion said:

And it can be clearly shown that none of the options described in that patent are actually used. Try again. 

 

Show me that none of them are used.

Now you have to deliver boi. 

 

Quote

Or, in fact, you should probably start by actually reading that patent. All the people I've seen invoking it so far as "proof" of MM manipulation seem to have not only mixed up "holding a patent" with "having implemented the contents" - they have no idea what the contents actually are.

 

 

Check my post there.

Why do you think I said they "mention" it ? :Smile_facepalm:

Try again. :Smile_smile:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
153 posts
8,719 battles

If paying money would improve your chances in any meaningfull way I would be 70% WR player.

 

I know it would be not fair, but :cap_money: and give me +5% WR, Thank you.

 

Actually it will be a point in game that will indicate it is on the brim of extinction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
504 posts

Hmm, I got the Baltimore a few days ago I was ridiculously bad in it and then was top tier a few times. I’m OK now so bottom tier again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
15,931 posts
11,179 battles

If Battle Tier was influenced by Winrating,  then our deep red players would be top Tier very often.

When you now take a look at the players who complain about being bottom Tier, you very often find these deep red players.

 

This is contradicting the patent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOXIC]
[TOXIC]
Players
4,358 posts
11,268 battles
1 hour ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Show me that none of them are used.

Now you have to deliver boi.  

(...)

Check my post there.

Why do you think I said they "mention" it ? :Smile_facepalm:

Try again. :Smile_smile:

Quote them for me, please (the ones you believe are used, I'm tired of digging through them all at every occasion). I've debunked them recently in one of the threads of some conspiracy moro... enthusiast that was kind enough to keep the link to the patent in his signature (without ever reading the contents, it would seem) and I can do that again but I don't really feel like digging through the patent again just because another person bringing up "the patent" and "mm manipulation" popped up.

Although I'll at least acknowledge that you're not dumb enough to mistake the contents of the patent for something assigning better or worse teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BS4]
Players
881 posts
5,495 battles

38bx6zc.gif ??

 

12 hours ago, achim1968 said:

 

  1. With full AA build there are less CVs?

U2JAoUg.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
42 posts
97 battles

Hello guys, 

 

This thread has been locked due to non constructive content.

 

Thank you for your understanding. :Smile_glasses:

 

Have a nice Wednesday! :Smile_bajan2:

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 2
  • Angry 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×