Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
___V_E_N_O_M___

USS Wichita on sale in the SEA server, My wallet stays closed though

28 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[TIPC]
Players
252 posts
10,697 battles
Just now, Yedwy said:

I think it was concealment?

Yeah 8,6 km whit everything.

Whit similar range radar on top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TEA]
Players
954 posts
4,253 battles
2 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

I think it was concealment?

Yeh it says has same concealment as the Edinburgh.

 

Perhaps WG will charge a premium for a Nerf-Free version: Wichita £35 and Wichita NF £55 :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,133 posts
9,962 battles

So it's not for steel? I guess that means HMS Soon was Neustrashimy. Probably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PUPSI]
Players
6,594 posts
Vor 6 Minuten, ___V_E_N_O_M___ sagte:

Perhaps WG will charge a premium for a Nerf-Free version:

no premium should be "nerf-free"...

 

but still no Wichita at the EU shop :Smile_sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
504 posts
2 minutes ago, MoveZig said:

So it's not for steel? I guess that means HMS Soon was Neustrashimy. Probably.

No the that ship was the tier ten Azuma.

it disappeared when Azuma was announced for freeXP and it’s sister for coal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TEA]
Players
954 posts
4,253 battles
Just now, Klopirat said:

no premium should be "nerf-free"...

 

but still no Wichita at the EU shop :Smile_sad:

Dont buy their stuff, they dont deserve our money

  • Cool 6
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
504 posts
14 minutes ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said:

Yeh it says has same concealment as the Edinburgh.

 

Perhaps WG will charge a premium for a Nerf-Free version: Wichita £35 and Wichita NF £55 :Smile_trollface:

Don’t believe the Wiki, it also says it lacks SHS but the premium shop page says it has them.

 

EDIT: hmm not SHS by name but implied:

 

flat-trajectory ballistics and effective ricochet angles of her AP shells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BGBRD]
Players
319 posts
9,566 battles

Another generic US cruiser with a gimmick of some sort... Why do we have to care?

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
3,391 posts
12,027 battles
22 minutes ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said:

Dont buy their stuff, they dont deserve our money

Indeed. WGs attitude towards us, their customers, their plans and their decisions, have firmly turned this whale's wallet closed for the time.

Besides, no matter how nice the ship is, WG will soon create a precedent in allowing them to nerf it to the ground for reasons.

 

PS: I really wanted the Wichita.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
504 posts
3 minutes ago, Aragathor said:

Indeed. WGs attitude towards us, their customers, their plans and their decisions, have firmly turned this whale's wallet closed for the time.

Besides, no matter how nice the ship is, WG will soon create a precedent in allowing them to nerf it to the ground for reasons.

 

PS: I really wanted the Wichita.

I feel exactly the same, spent hundreds last year but I’m less keen to now.

it would be interesting if Wargaming saw lower sale numbers since it’s GC announcement.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
[NWP]
Players
8,241 posts
11,737 battles
34 minutes ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said:

Dont buy their stuff, they dont deserve our money

 

9 minutes ago, Aragathor said:

Indeed. WGs attitude towards us, their customers, their plans and their decisions, have firmly turned this whale's wallet closed for the time.

Besides, no matter how nice the ship is, WG will soon create a precedent in allowing them to nerf it to the ground for reasons.

 

PS: I really wanted the Wichita.

Since WG think it's OK to use their paying customers to test their CV rework then surely they should be paying us as play testers? 

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
1,307 posts
14,657 battles

If they nerfed concealment its pretty much pointless? I mean t8 us ca that is nearly identical to balti you can have for free (many even have that free permacamo for it that was given away this summer) and in current mm that nearly guarantees t10 match...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
3,391 posts
12,027 battles
5 minutes ago, Yedwy said:

If they nerfed concealment its pretty much pointless? I mean t8 us ca that is nearly identical to balti you can have for free (many even have that free permacamo for it that was given away this summer) and in current mm that nearly guarantees t10 match...

Plus Baltimore has Super Heavy Shells, which the Wichita lacks.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
1,307 posts
14,657 battles

In conclusion if i even want to play a t8 us ca and get chased by 5 t10s whole match im better off in the balti... Check

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MIRKO]
Players
405 posts
4,040 battles

Another T8 premium with guaranteed T10 MM, worse than it's tech tree counterpart, with no assurance it won't get "balanced" even more in the future.

 

Since I strongly disagree with the current state of the game and with how WG treats it's customers, I will gladly vote with my wallet.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SHAD]
Players
504 posts
1 minute ago, StalkerSoC said:

Could have made a nice T7 replacing Indy... Now it's a worst Baltimore.

One day they will buff the Indy.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EUR]
Players
97 posts

 

3 hours ago, ___V_E_N_O_M___ said:

 

Honestly until a week ago I was keen to buy it. BUT since WG as announced the RETIER of Giulio Cesare I will NOT.

Why to risk that in a year WG  decides to nerf it?? 

Sorry until the Giulio Cesare issue will not be clarified I will keep my wallet closed!! 

this lack of consideration for customer must END!

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×