[BRITS] fallenkezef [BRITS] Players 1,788 posts 1,954 battles Report post #1 Posted February 8, 2019 Let us move on with some non-CV wishlisting of what you want to see ingame going forward. Royal Sovereign class (Royal Oak as a premium?): Same 8x 15inch guns as Warspite/QE but better secondaries (12x 6inch to the Warspite's 8) but less range as the class could not elevate guns as high as the QE class. Slower than QE and with poor aa defences. Basicly a gimicky T6 British brawler. Renown class: 6x 15inch guns, poor armour but fast. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-TPF-] invicta2012 Players 6,382 posts 26,855 battles Report post #2 Posted February 8, 2019 Honestly? These ships have come up a lot. Good luck with working out where they go. The main problem is 15 inch guns - which would be a nightmare if let loose at Tier V - and armour/speed which makes the ships unsuitable for being uptiered. Personally I think you could get Renown, post 1930s refit, up to Tier VII, but Repulse doesn't really fit anywhere very well. As for the Royal Sovereign class.... they'd always be second fiddle to the QEs. The Queen Elizabeth class was the last time the RN had the money and the political support to build what it wanted without compromise. Fantastic ships. As a Brit and a fan of the RN, then, I want them to stop mucking around with CVs and give me Exeter, now, pls thank you v much. Then the County Class CAs, Dido and Arethusa CLs. And then... Battlecruisers. And especially HMS Tiger. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] Verblonde Players 9,787 posts 20,656 battles Report post #3 Posted February 8, 2019 (Assuming CVs get sorted out such that everything is as playable as before, at least). More Commonwealth ships and/or make the captains interchangeable with the RN ones; a full tech tree would be nice (well, cruisers and DDs anyway). The missing River Plate ships. RN Battlecruisers. HMS Cavalier. Dido class. Italian tech tree! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] eliastion Players 4,795 posts 12,260 battles Report post #4 Posted February 8, 2019 ORP Orzeł as a premium submarine (if they ever appear in the game) and Jan Grudziński as a Polish/pan-European special commander with improved Last Stand and Andrenaline Rush skills Or at least some more anime girl captains that don't need to be bought for real money Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KOKOS] DanSilverwing Players 1,193 posts 19,517 battles Report post #5 Posted February 8, 2019 I refer my honourable friend to the answer I gave last time: "World of Warships: Age of Sail edition. If they can model Submarines they can model a weather gauge". 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Humorpalanta ∞ Players 2,025 posts 13,785 battles Report post #6 Posted February 8, 2019 32 minutes ago, Verblonde said: ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Dildo class. ... Then: Oh, nvm. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[XTREM] Miragetank90 Players 2,626 posts 18,702 battles Report post #7 Posted February 8, 2019 Off the top of my head, the real list is much longer: Renown-class Italian tech tree Sovetsky Soyuz-class(Soon it seems. Great!) Midway with jets again Shinano as an alternate tier 10 CV Tillman-class More operations. Especially from the Axis side. I'm thinking things like Operation Cerberus. Submarines at some point Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[XTREM] Miragetank90 Players 2,626 posts 18,702 battles Report post #8 Posted February 8, 2019 21 minutes ago, eliastion said: Or at least some more anime girl captains that don't need to be bought for real money Yes! More crossover material. Want. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-TPF-] invicta2012 Players 6,382 posts 26,855 battles Report post #9 Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Miragetank90 said: Midway with jets again Tillman-class Sure, as long as we can have Viraat with Sea Harriers. And the Tillmans? Don't give them bad ideas. Did you see the Russian version? Gavrilov battleship - Russian projekt (1914 year, 16x406/45, 24x152/55, 30 knots) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[XTREM] Miragetank90 Players 2,626 posts 18,702 battles Report post #10 Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, invicta2012 said: Sure, as long as we can have Viraat with Sea Harriers. And the Tillmans? Don't give them bad ideas. Did you see the Russian version? Gavrilov battleship - Russian projekt (1914 year, 16x406/45, 24x152/55, 30 knots) Or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Incomparable Literally Incomparable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CR33D] fumtu [CR33D] Players 3,842 posts 38,979 battles Report post #11 Posted February 8, 2019 CL Dido Class of course. Which one doesn't really matter USS Honolulu or USS Savannah (more Brooklyns please) DDs HMS Cavalier HMS Gurkha (L class with 2x4 4inch) USS Laffey (Allan M Sumner Class) USS Sterett (Benham Class) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[COMFY] ImperialAdmiral [COMFY] Players 1,649 posts 9,828 battles Report post #12 Posted February 8, 2019 First Italian line Italian OTO Leghorn Battlecruiser as a premium RN heavy cruiser line Soviet premium CV because why not Oh and definitely hybrid ships like Tone and Ise Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[XTREM] Miragetank90 Players 2,626 posts 18,702 battles Report post #13 Posted February 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, ImperialAdmiral said: Oh and definitely hybrid ships like Tone and Ise Yes. Almost forgot. We need these unique ships in game. My collection is crying. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[S-E] FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor Players 3,532 posts 29,234 battles Report post #14 Posted February 8, 2019 Vor 1 Stunde, fallenkezef sagte: (Royal Oak as a premium?): Only if you get a yuge bonus for sinking her with a submarine. By and large, I very much agree with Flambass though that we don't need any new ships for quite some time, and that it is much more important (after the CV mess is resolved) to improve the GUI, and develop a much more ergonomical and less laggy port interface, and decent replay controls. Those should be the priorities. Frankly I can't understand why the replay improvements haven't long since been prioritized since replay videos on Youtube are a major marketing tool and it costs WG absolutely nothing. There are lots of people out there lining up to literally spin crap into gold for WG, for nothing, but WG refuses to give them decent tools. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BHSFL] Beastofwar [BHSFL] Players 4,596 posts Report post #15 Posted February 8, 2019 Land based bombers ofcourse. To do this to the enemy fleet. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HMSR] Major_Damage225 Beta Tester 2,875 posts 7,295 battles Report post #16 Posted February 8, 2019 Good lists of ships, to that i'll add just one atm. SMS Blücher (mini nassau CA) 55 minutes ago, invicta2012 said: Gavrilov battleship - Russian projekt (1914 year, 16x406/45, 24x152/55, 30 knots) You ment this one? Yee, i see it working as a T6 premium Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Culiacan_Mexico Players 2,844 posts 14,993 battles Report post #17 Posted February 8, 2019 U796 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] Verblonde Players 9,787 posts 20,656 battles Report post #18 Posted February 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Humorpalanta said: Then: Oh, nvm. Godsdammit - I had to go back and check I hadn't typed a Freudian slip...! Git! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] Verblonde Players 9,787 posts 20,656 battles Report post #19 Posted February 8, 2019 BTW has anyone mentioned Seydlitz, and/or other German battlecruisers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Seydlitz 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BBMM] BLUB__BLUB [BBMM] Players 8,818 posts 17,199 battles Report post #20 Posted February 8, 2019 2 hours ago, invicta2012 said: Honestly? These ships have come up a lot. Good luck with working out where they go. The main problem is 15 inch guns - which would be a nightmare if let loose at Tier V - and armour/speed which makes the ships unsuitable for being uptiered. Personally I think you could get Renown, post 1930s refit, up to Tier VII, but Repulse doesn't really fit anywhere very well. Why would it be a nightmare - they put West Virginia in T6... But could work well, just have them 'the old way' and load the guns with less powder charge. Hey presto there's less speed, so less pen at distance, at your service. They'll still uptier well to T6 too. Quote As for the Royal Sovereign class.... they'd always be second fiddle to the QEs. The Queen Elizabeth class was the last time the RN had the money and the political support to build what it wanted without compromise. Fantastic ships. Main thing they could not adapt them/refit them between WW1-WW2 was because they were built differently (read: cheaper). Quote As a Brit and a fan of the RN, then, I want them to stop mucking around with CVs and give me Exeter, now, pls thank you v much. Then the County Class CAs, Dido and Arethusa CLs. And then... Battlecruisers. And especially HMS Tiger. Gimme Ark Royal with Swordfishes dammit! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[GEUS] TeaAndTorps Players 820 posts 2,680 battles Report post #21 Posted February 8, 2019 34 minutes ago, Verblonde said: BTW has anyone mentioned Seydlitz, and/or other German battlecruisers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Seydlitz Good shout!l Along with British battlecruisers obvs. Dido class, naturally. (Just finished re-reading HMS Ulysses, so quite enthused about that. Bonus points if you actually manage to sink a Hipper-class cruiser in one) Italian tech tree Pan-Europeans: Java, Stord But yeah, as mentioned above... I kinda wouldn't mind if they spent some time focused on greatly improving the UI, and maybe even getting us some new maps, over producing lots and lots of new ships.. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[GEUS] TeaAndTorps Players 820 posts 2,680 battles Report post #22 Posted February 8, 2019 11 minutes ago, BLUB__BLUB said: Gimme Ark Royal with Swordfishes dammit! And please with Swordfish dropping torpedoes, not this weird fantasy level-bomber version on Hermes. Normally I spend too much time worrying about historical accuracy in my day job to be too too bothered about it in an online game, but some things should be sacred 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pametrada Players 709 posts 5,022 battles Report post #23 Posted February 9, 2019 4 hours ago, fallenkezef said: Let us move on with some non-CV wishlisting of what you want to see ingame going forward. Non-CV wishlisting eh ? Non CVs are actually on my wishlist - I 'd like to see a gunnery-only game mode. No radars either, or submarines ( if and when they appear ). Include short range Whitehead torpedoes , with the Diana's bow tube made functional, more persistent funnel smoke that may obscure your view, and other embellishments I have yet to think of. Back to basics, in other words. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] Mr_Tayto Players 1,099 posts 10,119 battles Report post #24 Posted February 9, 2019 7 hours ago, Verblonde said: (Assuming CVs get sorted out such that everything is as playable as before, at least). More Commonwealth ships and/or make the captains interchangeable with the RN ones; a full tech tree would be nice (well, cruisers and DDs anyway). The missing River Plate ships. RN Battlecruisers. HMS Cavalier. Dido class. Italian tech tree! Are you me? Agree wholeheartedly with everything you wrote. Personally I can't wait for Italian cruisers, the prems we have are underappreciated. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-MM] _Dunc_ Weekend Tester 350 posts 11,822 battles Report post #25 Posted February 9, 2019 Dunc's Wishlist 1 - replace Port GUI with something designed and optimized in the last decade 2 - 10 - repeat #1 11 - more missions, campaigns, and stuff 12 - ships that actually made it off the drawing board... We're lurching into WoT nonsense stuff at the moment, as WG do their usual content at all costs thing. We don't need new tech trees for everything, sub branches that lead nowhere are fine; we'll still grind/FXP them... 13 - 20 - see #1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites