Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
TheRonson

The game is ruined

8 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
195 posts

 

What has changed? normally 2 squadrons of Torpedo bombers hovering near the Minotaur at a range of 2.5 - 3K wouldn't stand a chance, it would be cannon fodder,  probably kill 8 out of 10 without fail,   but sometimes all 10.

Today with the Mino Broadside on to the 2 squadrons,  guns blazing ..... and nothing!     Zero kills, then the aircraft all disappear at 3k distance.  Is this part of the new CV changes to the game.  Aircraft coming in and out of view at 3k, and now impossible to shoot down?  Also as the strike aircraft are launching at the immediate start of the game so resulting in zero spotting now for DD's?  Is this WG idea of an improvement.

 

  • Cool 5
  • Boring 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,292 posts
9,526 battles

Well maybe we need 101, 102, 103 or 1,000... unless people create these threads WG will not listen...every member of this forum has the right to create his/her thread to voice their displeasure or appreciation unless we are now being policed.. Single threads with multiple replies can be ignored.. single threads from individual forum members are much harder to ignore.

  • Cool 5
  • Boring 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MIAU]
[MIAU]
Players
3,213 posts
41 minutes ago, Migantium_Mashum said:

Well maybe we need 101, 102, 103 or 1,000... unless people create these threads WG will not listen...every member of this forum has the right to create his/her thread to voice their displeasure or appreciation unless we are now being policed.. Single threads with multiple replies can be ignored.. single threads from individual forum members are much harder to ignore.

Spam is not a suitable way to voice critzism. Spam is just noise.

Making compelling arguments instead of trying to shout down the rest of the community might be harder but it is much more rewarding.

  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
5,900 posts
7,187 battles
2 minutes ago, Egoleter said:

Spam is not a suitable way to voice critzism. Spam is just noise.

Making compelling arguments instead of trying to shout down the rest of the community might be harder but it is much more rewarding.

 

IN this case, the threadstarter is obviously unfamiliar in how CVs work these days. He complains, planes are vanishing at 3km - which makes perfect sense when the CV just pushed F-button to recall the strike.

And no, he is not obliged to learn abusing mechanics from the CV rework. The amount of CV complain threads within the last week is HUGE, no sane person can be asked to read through all of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
8,460 posts
11,307 battles
7 minutes ago, DFens_666 said:

[...] no sane person can be asked to read through all of that.

You say that as if sanity was a preferable state of mind.

 

I politely disagree.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WJDE]
Beta Tester
555 posts
8,741 battles
18 minutes ago, Egoleter said:

Making compelling arguments

Again: those were made before the rework and during testing. Wargaming doesn't and will not listen.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×