[UPD 11/2] Update 0.8.0.2 Hotfix

[L_L_I_B]

Poor that the free captain skills and ships module changes have been removed when the meta is still very new, not properly understood and regular changes are still being introduced.

[DuneDreamer]

Why do you type so much? WG never listens to their player base. They only pretend to do so. It's all about justifying developer hours and giving the impression of a very dedicated dev support so they play with nerfs, buffs and hotfixes.

In the meantime, you never know if you should buy a particular ship or any ship at all as you may end up with something very different (due to constant changes) in two months time.

[DuneDreamer]

On 2/9/2019 at 11:32 AM, m3c0 said:

Nice job Wargaming, you really managed to mess up completely the CVs. With the so called 0.8.0.1 "hotfix" you totally killed the carriers.

Strange. I thought they said their idea was to introduce the carriers to the game. :)

[Infiriel]

6.02.2019 o 19:01, Infiriel napisał:

I guess you need to hotfix the hotfix page

Well...
Nailed it...

[DuneDreamer]

On 2/6/2019 at 8:01 PM, Infiriel said:

I guess you need to hotfix the hotfix page

Never hotfix a hotfix. It will lead to yet more hotfixes. REVERT!

[DuneDreamer]

[Lacomble1942]

On ‎2‎/‎6‎/‎2019 at 6:20 PM, The_EURL_Guy said:

We're already making changes based on your feedback. Read about the changes coming in 0.8.0.1.

Read it on the portal

So AA back as it was and less Tier 10's when you Battle with your Tier 8's.  And no ban when you leave a battle with only 2 Tier 8's in a Team.  Well the day thats fixed i win the Powerbal lottery

[InfinityIncarnate]

On 2/6/2019 at 6:20 PM, The_EURL_Guy said:

We're already making changes based on your feedback. Read about the changes coming in 0.8.0.1.

Read it on the portal

You're not making the most needed crucial change based on our feedback - Revert to the old carrier build and work improving that!

[rising_uk]

Hi, you want to balance something balance the AA on the Okt. Rev as it just puts up a wall of flak that you can't dodge in the no matter what type of plane you fly. I don't mind you nerfing the CV's in the name of 'balance' but at TIV it's very annoying that my whole squadron gets wiped out in two passes without being able to land a hit or very rarely land one against one ship.

p.s.

Although I think this idea of 'balancing' the game and all will be well is a pipe-dream, as what you've gone and done is nerf the meta so badly that I think this game is now beyond saving in comparison to the fairly enjoyable tactical game you spent years building, many of the ships can't do the functions they were designed for, the maps are pretty much pointless as are the objectives. I wish you luck trying to make this a great game again but I seriously have my doubts and definitely won't be giving you a penny again.

p.p.s

Might as well add the Texas to the list of again unapproachable AA in a T4 carrier.

[DarkPhariah]

wg can always just revert to 0.70 and make musashi and missouri available for everyone .. then all problems solved :)

 

cheers!

[Luke6_31]

Good luck WG. I think this Hotfix will rebalance the CV v AA meta a tiny bit. However, I am quite intrigued by iChaseGaming suggestion of making long range AA user controlled. I believe the issue would be that in a fire fight devoting time to using AA might be a touch difficult but if it could also be rigged with an auto-activation system similar to the one we currently have it might just work. Generally very happy with the work and effort WG are putting in to get this right and I wish them all the best with it.

[cpt_sparrow_jack]

hotfix better your broken UI the game is unplayable 

[MurderousKitten]

after the last [edited]up " fix " i am actually interested if they will screw something up even more or they have actually done something of value :D

[Burky79]

6 minutes ago, MurderousKitten said:

after the last [edited]up " fix " i am actually interested if they will screw something up even more or they have actually done something of value :D

hope that they fix before 0.9.9.9.9 :D
problem is that they f*  up version 0.8, because they ignore all given feedback and they are unable admit that they went the wrong way and trying to fix nearly unfixable

[DuneDreamer]

9 minutes ago, Burky79 said:

problem is that they f*  up version 0.8, because they ignore all given feedback and they are unable admit that they went the wrong way and trying to fix nearly unfixable 

That's true. The problem with admitting it is that there are too many developer hours (lots of money) spend on 0.8, which is a huge responsibility.

[Verblonde]

3 hours ago, Zalama said:

"To allow you to adapt your Commanders and ships to the new carrier gameplay as comfortably as possible, from February 8 to February 11, you’ll be able to retrain your Commanders, redistribute their skill points and demount modernizations for free. This event includes all Commanders and ships, regardless of specialization or class."

 

Today is Feb 11 but retraining is not anymore available!  If it never was supposed to include Feb 11 then it should been February 8 to February 10.

FWIW this is just the usual thing that WG do (it happens on WOT too) - end dates are technically correct because things like this finish with server resets, and those happen in the wee hours of the morning.

 

So, for most people, if a mission (say) ends on December 16th, the last day you'll be able to do said mission is realistically the 15th - unless you want to stay up until some ungodsly hour of the morning.

 

To repeat: this is nothing new, and (annoying as it is) I can't see WG changing it. This, incidentally, was why I put the PSA thing up on the gameplay section of the forum yesterday - someone always forgets.

[Bagstabber]

omfg.. im selling my cv... not even worth the game any more

[rising_uk]

Your update also appears to have lost 1,938 games from my in-game battle statistics?

[HentaiSquirrel]

4 hours ago, DuneDreamer said:

Never hotfix a hotfix. It will lead to yet more hotfixes. REVERT!

;-D

[wilkatis_LV]

5 hours ago, Adm_Ballsey said:

from February 8 to February 11

4 hours ago, Zalama said:

from February 8 to February 11

February 11th 6 AM CET

 

Your selective reading is noone elses fault

[BackfirePL]

My personal observation - Atago (the great premium ship in general) is unplayable after rework. Just easy to keep spotted, easy to get owned by rockets. 

[DuneDreamer]

11 minutes ago, BackfirePL said:

My personal observation - Atago (the great premium ship in general) is unplayable after revork. Just easy to keep spotted, easy to get owned by rockets. 

I hope I can exchange that one too for doubloons as I did with Saipan. I no longer play it. :)

[BackfirePL]

2 minutes ago, DuneDreamer said:

I hope I can exchange that one too for doubloons as I did with Saipan. I no longer play it. :)

Will be great, but I don't think WG give u or me that option, cause... new CVs "working as intendend".

[DarkPhariah]

lol

I have not seen this many complaints since the ruining of Ogame or Diablo3 ...

 

and what exactly am I supposed to do with my life now.. go outside? find a girl? man...

[GaiusHun]

This is a fantastic new and new nerf for cv players. Would you like to ask a simple question when the elite cv captain's award is canceled? Because the last two levels will slowly be unfulfilled. Would it be easier to delete cv development? Is this a real goal?
Have you repaired a bug in which cv is attacking a page and there is no damage? Corrected 0 dmg attack circles when a full bond is lost due to 0 damage attack?
Do you have any realistic and reasonable idea that your opponent's team will remain in a closed bond? because then the cv player can go out as well, since he can't play anything outside the discovery ?! Do you plan to compensate cv players for lost averages?